• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不失真的翻译:跨越语言的神经反应。

Not lost in translation: neural responses shared across languages.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, USA.

出版信息

J Neurosci. 2012 Oct 31;32(44):15277-83. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1800-12.2012.

DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1800-12.2012
PMID:23115166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3525075/
Abstract

How similar are the brains of listeners who hear the same content expressed in different languages? We directly compared the fMRI response time courses of English speakers and Russian speakers who listened to a real-life Russian narrative and its English translation. In the translation, we tried to preserve the content of the narrative while reducing the structural similarities across languages. The story evoked similar brain responses, invariant to the structural changes across languages, beginning just outside early auditory areas and extending through temporal, parietal, and frontal cerebral cortices. The similarity of responses across languages was nearly equal to the similarity of responses within each language group. The present results demonstrate that the human brain processes real-life information in a manner that is largely insensitive to the language in which that information is conveyed. The methods introduced here can potentially be used to quantify the transmission of meaning across cultural and linguistic boundaries.

摘要

听众在听到以不同语言表达的相同内容时,他们的大脑有多么相似?我们直接比较了英语使用者和俄语使用者的 fMRI 反应时程,他们分别听到了一段真实的俄语叙述及其英译本。在翻译中,我们尝试在保留叙述内容的同时减少语言之间的结构相似性。故事引发了相似的大脑反应,与语言之间的结构变化无关,这些反应始于早期听觉区域之外,并延伸至颞叶、顶叶和额叶大脑皮层。跨语言的反应相似性几乎与每种语言组内的反应相似性相等。本研究结果表明,人类大脑以一种在很大程度上不受信息传达语言影响的方式处理真实信息。这里介绍的方法可以潜在地用于量化跨文化和语言边界的意义传递。

相似文献

1
Not lost in translation: neural responses shared across languages.不失真的翻译:跨越语言的神经反应。
J Neurosci. 2012 Oct 31;32(44):15277-83. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1800-12.2012.
2
Language in context: emergent features of word, sentence, and narrative comprehension.语境中的语言:单词、句子和叙事理解的新兴特征。
Neuroimage. 2005 Apr 15;25(3):1002-15. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.013.
3
Domain-General Brain Regions Do Not Track Linguistic Input as Closely as Language-Selective Regions.非语言特异性脑区对语言输入的追踪不如语言特异性脑区紧密。
J Neurosci. 2017 Oct 11;37(41):9999-10011. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3642-16.2017. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
4
Decoding the neural representation of story meanings across languages.跨语言解码故事意义的神经表示。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Dec;38(12):6096-6106. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23814. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
5
Native and non-native reading of sentences: an fMRI experiment.句子的母语阅读与非母语阅读:一项功能磁共振成像实验。
Neuroimage. 2006 May 15;31(1):354-65. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.047. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
6
Selective and invariant neural responses to spoken and written narratives.对口语和书面叙述的选择性和不变的神经反应。
J Neurosci. 2013 Oct 2;33(40):15978-88. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1580-13.2013.
7
Expectancy constraints in degraded speech modulate the language comprehension network.在退化语音中,期望约束调节语言理解网络。
Cereb Cortex. 2010 Mar;20(3):633-40. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp128. Epub 2009 Jun 26.
8
Effect of syntactic similarity on cortical activation during second language processing: a comparison of English and Japanese among native Korean trilinguals.句法相似性对第二语言加工过程中皮层激活的影响:以韩语母语的三语者为例比较英语和日语
Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Mar;28(3):194-204. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20269.
9
Interpretation-mediated changes in neural activity during language comprehension.在语言理解过程中,中介解释引起的神经活动变化。
Neuroimage. 2011 Apr 1;55(3):1314-23. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
10
Bilingual brain organization: a functional magnetic resonance adaptation study.双语大脑组织:一项功能磁共振适应研究。
Neuroimage. 2006 May 15;31(1):366-75. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.012. Epub 2006 Feb 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergence of a temporal processing gradient from naturalistic inputs and network connectivity.从自然主义输入和网络连接中出现时间处理梯度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul 15;122(28):e2420105122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2420105122. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
2
Shared disbelief and shared belief: Belief and disbelief as drivers of interpersonal neural synchronization during narrative processing.共同的怀疑与共同的信念:叙事加工过程中,信念与怀疑作为人际神经同步的驱动因素
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jun 10;122(23):e2422396122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2422396122. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
3
A unified acoustic-to-speech-to-language embedding space captures the neural basis of natural language processing in everyday conversations.一个统一的声学-语音-语言嵌入空间捕捉了日常对话中自然语言处理的神经基础。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 May;9(5):1041-1055. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02105-9. Epub 2025 Mar 7.
4
A core set of neural states underlying naturalistic memory reactivation in the posterior medial cortex.后内侧皮质中自然主义记忆重新激活背后的一组核心神经状态。
bioRxiv. 2025 Feb 6:2024.12.11.627957. doi: 10.1101/2024.12.11.627957.
5
The Complex Role Played by the Default Mode Network during Sexual Stimulation: A Cluster-Based fMRI Meta-Analysis.默认模式网络在性刺激过程中所起的复杂作用:基于聚类的功能磁共振成像荟萃分析
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 5;14(7):570. doi: 10.3390/bs14070570.
6
How does the "default mode" network contribute to semantic cognition?“默认模式”网络如何促进语义认知?
Brain Lang. 2024 May;252:105405. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2024.105405. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
7
Functional characterization of the language network of polyglots and hyperpolyglots with precision fMRI.利用精确 fMRI 技术对多语者和超语者语言网络的功能特征进行研究。
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Mar 1;34(3). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae049.
8
Attention-Driven Modulation of Auditory Cortex Activity during Selective Listening in a Multispeaker Setting.多说话人环境下选择性倾听时听觉皮层活动的注意驱动调制。
J Neurosci. 2024 Apr 10;44(15):e1157232023. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1157-23.2023.
9
Driving and suppressing the human language network using large language models.使用大型语言模型驱动和抑制人类语言网络。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Mar;8(3):544-561. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01783-7. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
10
A normative model of brain responses to social scenarios reflects the maturity of children and adolescents' social-emotional abilities.一种规范性的大脑对社会场景反应模型反映了儿童和青少年社会情感能力的成熟度。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023 Nov 15;18(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsad062.

本文引用的文献

1
Loss of reliable temporal structure in event-related averaging of naturalistic stimuli.自然刺激事件相关平均中可靠时间结构的丧失。
Neuroimage. 2012 Oct 15;63(1):501-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.008. Epub 2012 Jul 14.
2
Topographic mapping of a hierarchy of temporal receptive windows using a narrated story.使用叙述性故事对时间感受窗口的层次结构进行地形测绘。
J Neurosci. 2011 Feb 23;31(8):2906-15. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3684-10.2011.
3
Speaker-listener neural coupling underlies successful communication.说话者-听者神经耦合是成功交流的基础。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Aug 10;107(32):14425-30. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008662107. Epub 2010 Jul 26.
4
Hierarchical organization of human auditory cortex: evidence from acoustic invariance in the response to intelligible speech.人类听觉皮层的层次组织:来自对可理解语音反应的不变性的证据。
Cereb Cortex. 2010 Oct;20(10):2486-95. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp318. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
5
Temporal envelope of time-compressed speech represented in the human auditory cortex.时间压缩语音在人类听觉皮层中的时间包络表示。
J Neurosci. 2009 Dec 9;29(49):15564-74. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3065-09.2009.
6
Reliability of cortical activity during natural stimulation.自然刺激过程中的皮质活动的可靠性。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Jan;14(1):40-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.10.011. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
7
ENERGY, QUANTA, AND VISION.能量、量子和视觉。
J Gen Physiol. 1942 Jul 20;25(6):819-40. doi: 10.1085/jgp.25.6.819.
8
Sequential processing of lexical, grammatical, and phonological information within Broca's area.布罗卡区内词汇、语法和语音信息的序列处理。
Science. 2009 Oct 16;326(5951):445-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1174481.
9
The primate cortical auditory system and neural representation of conspecific vocalizations.灵长类动物的皮层听觉系统及同种发声的神经表征。
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2009;32:315-46. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135431.
10
fMR-adaptation and the bilingual brain.功能磁共振适应与双语大脑。
Brain Lang. 2009 May-Jun;109(2-3):75-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Jul 16.