Columbia University, Department of Sociology, MC9649, 606 W 122nd St., New York, NY 10027, United States.
Soc Sci Res. 2013 Nov;42(6):1519-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
Numerous theories have been put forward for the high and continuing levels of gender segregation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields, but research has not systematically examined the extent to which these theories for the gender gap are consistent with actual trends. Using both administrative data and four separate longitudinal studies sponsored by the U.S. Department of Education's National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), we evaluate several prominent explanations for the persisting gender gap in STEM fields related to mathematics performance and background and general life goals, and find that none of them are empirically satisfactory. Instead, we suggest that the structure of majors and their linkages to professional training and careers may combine with gender differences in educational goals to influence the persisting gender gap in STEM fields. An analysis of gendered career aspirations, course-taking patterns, and pathways to medical and law school supports this explanation.
已经提出了许多理论来解释为什么在科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)领域中存在高度且持续的性别隔离现象,但研究尚未系统地检验这些性别差距理论与实际趋势的一致性程度。本研究使用行政数据和美国教育部国家教育统计中心(NCES)赞助的四项独立纵向研究,评估了与数学表现、背景和一般生活目标相关的几种解释 STEM 领域性别差距持续存在的主要理论,发现没有一种理论在经验上是令人满意的。相反,我们认为专业结构及其与专业培训和职业的联系可能与教育目标中的性别差异相结合,从而影响 STEM 领域的性别差距。对性别化的职业抱负、课程选择模式以及通往医学和法学院的途径的分析支持了这一解释。