Suppr超能文献

加利福尼亚州亚裔和白人的结直肠癌筛查:低健康素养和有限的英语水平。

Colorectal cancer screening: low health literacy and limited English proficiency among Asians and Whites in California.

机构信息

a Office of Public Health Studies , University of Hawai'i , Honolulu , Hawai'i , USA.

出版信息

J Health Commun. 2013;18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):242-55. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.825669.

Abstract

The authors examined the relationship between low health literacy (LHL), limited English proficiency (LEP), and meeting current U.S. Preventive Service Task Force colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines for Asians and Whites in California. For 1,478 Asian and 14,410 White respondents 50-75 years of age in the 2007 California Health Interview Survey, the authors examined meeting CRC screening guidelines using multivariable logistic models by LEP and LHL separately and in combination. Analyses were run with the full sample, then separately for Whites and Asians controlling for demographics and insurance. For those with LEP, patient-provider language concordance and CRC screening was examined. Overall, respondents with LEP and LHL were the least likely to meet CRC screening guidelines (36%) followed by LEP-only (45%), LHL-only (51%), and those with neither LHL nor LEP (59%), a hierarchy that remained significant in multivariable models. For Whites, LHL-only was associated with screening, whereas LEP-only and LEP and LHL were significant for Asians. Having a language concordant provider was not significantly associated with CRC screening among those with LEP. Health literacy is associated with CRC screening, but English proficiency is also critical to consider. Asians with both LEP and LHL appear particularly vulnerable to cancer screening disparities.

摘要

作者研究了低健康素养(LHL)、有限的英语水平(LEP)与美国预防服务工作组(U.S. Preventive Service Task Force)当前针对加利福尼亚州亚裔和白人的结直肠癌(CRC)筛查指南之间的关系。在 2007 年加利福尼亚健康访谈调查中,作者对年龄在 50-75 岁的 1478 名亚裔和 14410 名白人受访者进行了研究,分别使用多变量逻辑模型,根据 LEP 和 LHL 单独和组合来检查符合 CRC 筛查指南的情况。在对所有样本进行分析后,作者还分别对白人组和亚裔组进行了分析,同时控制了人口统计学和保险因素。对于那些存在 LEP 的人,作者还检查了医患语言一致性和 CRC 筛查情况。总体而言,存在 LEP 和 LHL 的受访者最不可能符合 CRC 筛查指南(36%),其次是仅存在 LEP(45%)、仅存在 LHL(51%)以及既不存在 LHL 也不存在 LEP(59%),这种层级关系在多变量模型中仍然显著。对于白人而言,仅存在 LHL 与筛查相关,而仅存在 LEP 和 LEP 与 LHL 与亚裔相关。对于那些存在 LEP 的人来说,拥有语言一致的提供者与 CRC 筛查之间没有显著关联。健康素养与 CRC 筛查相关,但英语水平也是需要考虑的关键因素。同时存在 LEP 和 LHL 的亚裔似乎特别容易受到癌症筛查差异的影响。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Patient Safety Event Risk and Language Barriers: A Scoping Review.患者安全事件风险与语言障碍:一项范围综述
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2025 Jun;51(6):438-446. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2025.02.002. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
9
Characteristics of Cancer Hospitals with Written Language Access Policies.具有书面语言无障碍政策的癌症医院的特征。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2023 Apr;25(2):282-290. doi: 10.1007/s10903-022-01399-5. Epub 2022 Sep 22.

本文引用的文献

2
6
Language concordance and patient-physician communication regarding mental health needs.语言一致性与医患沟通的心理健康需求。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Dec;59(12):2356-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03717.x. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
8

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验