Twersky Sylvia E, Jefferson Rebeca, Garcia-Ortiz Lisbet, Williams Erin, Pina Carol
Department of Public Health, The College of New Jersey, Ewing Township, NJ 08618, USA.
R. Barbara Gitenstein Library, The College of New Jersey, Ewing Township, NJ 08618, USA.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 31;12(3):364. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12030364.
A majority of individuals with limited English proficiency (LEP) in the U.S. are foreign-born, creating a complex intersection of language, socio-economic, and policy barriers to healthcare access and achieving good outcomes. Mapping the research literature is key to addressing how LEP intersects with healthcare. This scoping review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines and included PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Sociological Abstracts, EconLit, and Academic Search Premier. Study selection included quantitative studies since 2000 with outcomes specified for adults with LEP residing in the U.S. related to healthcare service access or defined health outcomes, including healthcare costs. A total of 137 articles met the inclusion criteria. Major outcomes included ambulatory care, hospitalization, screening, specific conditions, and general health. Overall, the literature identified differential access to and utilization of healthcare across multiple modalities with poorer outcomes among LEP populations compared with English-proficient populations. Current research includes inconsistent definitions for LEP populations, primarily cross-sectional studies, small sample sizes, and homogeneous language and regional samples. Current regulations and practices are insufficient to address the barriers that LEP individuals face to healthcare access and outcomes. Changes to EMRs and other data collection to consistently include LEP status and more methodologically rigorous studies are needed to address healthcare disparities for LEP individuals.
美国大多数英语水平有限(LEP)的人是外国出生的,这在语言、社会经济和政策方面造成了复杂的障碍,影响了他们获得医疗保健服务并取得良好治疗效果。梳理研究文献是解决LEP与医疗保健如何相互影响这一问题的关键。本综述遵循PRISMA-ScR指南,纳入了PubMed/MEDLINE、CINAHL、社会学文摘数据库、EconLit和学术搜索高级版数据库。研究选择包括自2000年以来的定量研究,其结果针对居住在美国的成年LEP人群,涉及医疗服务获取或明确的健康结果,包括医疗费用。共有137篇文章符合纳入标准。主要结果包括门诊护理、住院治疗、筛查、特定疾病和总体健康状况。总体而言,文献表明,与英语熟练人群相比,LEP人群在多种医疗模式下获得医疗保健服务的机会和利用率存在差异,且治疗效果较差。当前的研究存在对LEP人群定义不一致、主要为横断面研究、样本量小以及语言和地区样本同质化等问题。当前的法规和做法不足以解决LEP个体在获得医疗保健服务及治疗效果方面面临的障碍。需要对电子病历和其他数据收集方式进行改进,以持续纳入LEP状态,并开展更多方法更严谨的研究,以解决LEP个体的医疗保健差距问题。