• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

酒精激发试验反应可预测未来酒精使用障碍症状:一项为期6年的前瞻性研究。

Alcohol challenge responses predict future alcohol use disorder symptoms: a 6-year prospective study.

作者信息

King Andrea C, McNamara Patrick J, Hasin Deborah S, Cao Dingcai

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience (ACK, PJM), University of Chicago, Chicago Illinois.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience (ACK, PJM), University of Chicago, Chicago Illinois.

出版信息

Biol Psychiatry. 2014 May 15;75(10):798-806. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.08.001
PMID:24094754
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4280017/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Propensity for alcohol misuse may be linked to an individuals' response to alcohol. This study examined the role of alcohol response phenotypes to future drinking problems.

METHODS

One hundred four young heavy social drinkers participated in a within-subject, double-blind, placebo-controlled laboratory alcohol challenge study with 6-year follow-up. Participants were examined for subjective responses before and after receiving an intoxicating dose of alcohol (.8 g/kg) or a placebo beverage, given in random order. Follow-up was conducted in 5 waves over 6 years after the sessions to assess drinking behaviors and alcohol use disorder (AUD) symptoms. Retention was high with 98% (509 of 520) of possible follow-ups completed.

RESULTS

Greater sensitivity to alcohol, in terms of stimulation and rewarding effects (like, want more) and lower sensitivity to alcohol sedation predicted greater number of AUD symptoms through 6 years of follow-up. Cluster analyses revealed that for half the sample, increasing levels of stimulation and liking were predictors of more AUD symptoms with the other half divided between those showing like and want more and want more alone as significant predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings extend previous findings and offer new empirical insights into the propensity for excessive drinking and alcohol problems. Heightened alcohol stimulation and reward sensitivity robustly predicted more alcohol use disorder symptoms over time associated with greater binge-drinking frequency. These drinking problems were maintained and progressed as these participants were entering their third decade of life, a developmental interval when continued alcohol misuse becomes more deviant.

摘要

背景

酒精滥用倾向可能与个体对酒精的反应有关。本研究探讨了酒精反应表型对未来饮酒问题的作用。

方法

104名年轻的重度社交饮酒者参与了一项为期6年随访的受试者内双盲安慰剂对照实验室酒精激发研究。参与者在随机接受致醉剂量的酒精(0.8克/千克)或安慰剂饮料前后接受主观反应检查。在实验结束后的6年里分5波进行随访,以评估饮酒行为和酒精使用障碍(AUD)症状。随访完成率很高,完成了可能随访的98%(520次中的509次)。

结果

在刺激和奖赏效应(喜欢、想要更多)方面对酒精更敏感,以及对酒精镇静作用更不敏感,预测在6年随访期间会出现更多的酒精使用障碍症状。聚类分析显示,对于一半的样本,刺激和喜欢程度的增加是更多酒精使用障碍症状的预测因素,另一半则分为显示喜欢和想要更多以及仅想要更多作为显著预测因素的两组。

结论

这些发现扩展了先前的研究结果,并为过度饮酒倾向和酒精问题提供了新的实证见解。随着时间的推移,酒精刺激和奖赏敏感性增强有力地预测了更多与更高频率暴饮相关的酒精使用障碍症状。随着这些参与者进入第三个十年,即持续酒精滥用变得更加偏离常态的发育阶段,这些饮酒问题持续存在并发展。

相似文献

1
Alcohol challenge responses predict future alcohol use disorder symptoms: a 6-year prospective study.酒精激发试验反应可预测未来酒精使用障碍症状:一项为期6年的前瞻性研究。
Biol Psychiatry. 2014 May 15;75(10):798-806. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
2
Rewarding, stimulant, and sedative alcohol responses and relationship to future binge drinking.奖赏性、刺激性和镇静性酒精反应及其与未来暴饮的关系。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;68(4):389-99. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.26.
3
A Prospective 5-Year Re-examination of Alcohol Response in Heavy Drinkers Progressing in Alcohol Use Disorder.对进展为酒精使用障碍的重度饮酒者酒精反应进行的为期5年的前瞻性重新检查。
Biol Psychiatry. 2016 Mar 15;79(6):489-98. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 May 14.
4
Neural activation during anticipation of monetary gain or loss does not associate with positive subjective response to alcohol in binge drinkers.在期待金钱得失时的神经激活与狂欢性饮酒者对酒精的积极主观反应无关。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Jan 1;218:108432. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108432. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
5
Poor inhibitory control is associated with greater stimulation and less sedation following alcohol.酒精摄入后,抑制控制能力较差与刺激增加和镇静减少有关。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020 Mar;237(3):825-832. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05420-y. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
6
Subjective Responses to Alcohol in the Development and Maintenance of Alcohol Use Disorder.主观对酒精的反应在酒精使用障碍的发展和维持中的作用。
Am J Psychiatry. 2021 Jun;178(6):560-571. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20030247. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
7
Drinking Motives Predict Subjective Effects of Alcohol and Alcohol Wanting and Liking During Laboratory Alcohol Administration: A Mediated Pathway Analysis.饮酒动机预测实验室饮酒过程中酒精的主观效应、对酒精的渴望及喜好:一项中介途径分析
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016 Oct;40(10):2190-2198. doi: 10.1111/acer.13174. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
8
Drinking context, alcohol use, and subjective responses during binge drinking episodes measured by high-resolution ecological momentary assessment (HR-EMA).通过高分辨率生态瞬时评估(HR-EMA)测量的 binge drinking 期间的饮酒情境、饮酒量和主观反应。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2023 Mar;37(2):258-266. doi: 10.1037/adb0000887. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
9
Using Demand Curves to Quantify the Reinforcing Value of Social and Solitary Drinking.使用需求曲线量化社交性和孤独性饮酒的强化价值。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2020 Jul;44(7):1497-1507. doi: 10.1111/acer.14382. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
10
Differences in subjective response to alcohol in heavy- and light-drinking Chinese men versus Caucasian American men.重度和轻度饮酒的中国男性与美国白种男性对酒精主观反应的差异。
Addiction. 2015 Jan;110(1):91-9. doi: 10.1111/add.12737. Epub 2014 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of Alcohol in Groups of Heavy Drinking Young Adults: A Multi-Modal Investigation of Alcohol Responses in a Laboratory Social Setting.重度饮酒青年人群中酒精的影响:在实验室社交环境中对酒精反应的多模式调查。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2025 Jun 7. doi: 10.1177/21677026251333784.
2
Development of an alcohol biosensor non-wear algorithm: laboratory-based machine learning and field-based deployment.酒精生物传感器非佩戴算法的开发:基于实验室的机器学习和基于现场的部署。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 25;15(1):31154. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16640-y.
3
Early life stress modulates behavioral sensitivity to alcohol and promotes escalation of alcohol drinking.

本文引用的文献

1
DSM-5 criteria for substance use disorders: recommendations and rationale.DSM-5 物质使用障碍标准:建议和原理。
Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;170(8):834-51. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12060782.
2
The drug effects questionnaire: psychometric support across three drug types.药物效应问卷:三种药物类型的心理测量学支持。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013 May;227(1):177-92. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2954-z. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
3
Bridging Animal and Human Models: Translating From (and to) Animal Genetics.连接动物模型与人类模型:从动物遗传学(及向动物遗传学)进行转化
早年生活应激会调节对酒精的行为敏感性,并促使饮酒量增加。
bioRxiv. 2025 Jun 28:2025.06.27.661986. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.27.661986.
4
Aversion-resistant alcohol seeking in the human laboratory.人类实验室中对厌恶具有抗性的酒精寻求行为
Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2025 Jul 6. doi: 10.1111/acer.70078.
5
Unraveling time-dependent genetic components underlying alcohol response.揭示酒精反应背后的时间依赖性遗传成分。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2025 Jun 21. doi: 10.1038/s41386-025-02147-7.
6
Stressed Avoider rats show blunted sensitivity to alcohol's aversive effects: Potential contributions of the lateral habenula and lateral hypothalamus.应激回避型大鼠对酒精厌恶效应的敏感性降低:外侧缰核和外侧下丘脑的潜在作用。
bioRxiv. 2025 May 28:2025.05.23.655819. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.23.655819.
7
Genetic influences on alcohol sensitivity: A critical review.酒精敏感性的遗传影响:一项批判性综述。
Curr Addict Rep. 2024 Feb;11(1):94-104. doi: 10.1007/s40429-023-00530-2. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
8
Nucleus accumbens functional connectivity changes underlying alcohol expectancies in bipolar disorder and prospective alcohol outcomes: a within-subject randomized placebo-controlled alcohol administration fMRI study.双相情感障碍中酒精预期及预期酒精后果背后的伏隔核功能连接变化:一项受试者内随机安慰剂对照酒精给药功能磁共振成像研究
Front Neurosci. 2025 Apr 9;19:1549295. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1549295. eCollection 2025.
9
Disruptions in Reward-Guided Decision-Making Functions Are Predictive of Greater Oral Oxycodone Self-Administration in Male and Female Rats.奖赏引导决策功能的破坏可预测雄性和雌性大鼠口服羟考酮自我给药量的增加。
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2025 Jan 21;5(3):100450. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100450. eCollection 2025 May.
10
Across the spectrum: Acute alcohol responses in young adults with mild, moderate, and severe alcohol use disorder.全面研究:轻度、中度和重度酒精使用障碍的年轻成年人的急性酒精反应
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2025 Jun 1;271:112629. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112629. Epub 2025 Mar 1.
Alcohol Res. 2012;34(3):325-35.
4
Validation of the brief Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale (B-BAES).双相酒精效应量表(B-BAES)的验证。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013 Mar;37(3):470-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01941.x. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
5
Alternative substance paradigm: effectiveness of beverage blinding and effects on acute alcohol responses.替代物质范式:饮料盲法的效果及其对急性酒精反应的影响。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Oct;20(5):382-9. doi: 10.1037/a0029261. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
6
Alcohol and group formation: a multimodal investigation of the effects of alcohol on emotion and social bonding.酒精与群体形成:酒精对情绪和社会纽带影响的多模态研究。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Aug 1;23(8):869-78. doi: 10.1177/0956797611435134. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
7
Defining risk drinking.定义危险饮酒。
Alcohol Res Health. 2011;34(2):144-56.
8
Subjective responses to alcohol: a paradigm shift may be brewing.主观对酒精的反应:范式转变可能正在酝酿之中。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011 Oct;35(10):1726-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01629.x. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
9
Subjective response to alcohol challenge: a quantitative review.酒精挑战的主观反应:定量综述。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011 Oct;35(10):1759-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01521.x. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
10
Risky single-occasion drinking: bingeing is not bingeing.单次高风险饮酒:狂饮不算是狂饮。
Addiction. 2011 Jun;106(6):1037-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03167.x. Epub 2010 Oct 18.