Diab A, Hassan M, Boudaoud S, Marque C, Karlsson B
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:4366-9. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610513.
Understanding the direction and quantity of information flowing in a complex system is a fundamental task in signal processing. Several measures have been proposed to detect the quantity of synchronization and the directionality between time series and in physiological data. In this paper we use two methods that are widely used in synchronization and directionality analysis: Nonlinear correlation coefficient (h(2)) and the general synchronization (H). The performances of both methods were tested on four dimensional coupled synthetic nonlinear Rössler models. They were then applied to a single real labor contraction uterine EMG burst with the aim of using them to detect synchronization and to plot the map of direction of information flow between the whole signal channels. The results on synthetic signal show a slight superiority of H over h(2). The results obtained on a single contraction are encouraging for the future use of these tools for resolving the open question of the directionality of uterine contractions and may provide a way of finding their source loci.
理解复杂系统中信息流动的方向和数量是信号处理中的一项基本任务。已经提出了几种方法来检测时间序列之间以及生理数据中的同步数量和方向性。在本文中,我们使用了两种在同步和方向性分析中广泛使用的方法:非线性相关系数(h(2))和广义同步(H)。这两种方法的性能在四维耦合合成非线性罗斯勒模型上进行了测试。然后将它们应用于单个真实的分娩宫缩子宫肌电爆发,目的是用它们来检测同步性,并绘制整个信号通道之间的信息流方向图。合成信号的结果显示H比h(2)略有优势。在单次宫缩上获得的结果对于未来使用这些工具解决子宫收缩方向性这一悬而未决的问题是令人鼓舞的,并且可能提供一种找到其源位置的方法。