Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University London, United Kingdom.
PLoS Med. 2013 Oct;10(10):e1001522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001522. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
David McCoy and colleagues critique the dominance of "lives saved" models of assessing the impact of health programs, using The Global Fund as a case study. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
大卫·麦考伊(David McCoy)及其同事对以全球基金(The Global Fund)为例评估卫生规划影响的“拯救生命”模型的主导地位提出批评。请在文章后面查看编辑总结。