Tarleton Heather P, Smith Lisa V, Zhang Zuo-Feng, Kuo Tony
Department of Health and Human Sciences, Loyola Marymount University, 211 North Hall, One LMU Drive, MS 8160, Los Angeles, CA, 90045-2659, USA,
J Community Health. 2014 Jun;39(3):471-9. doi: 10.1007/s10900-013-9780-z.
Body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) are two common anthropometric measures of obesity in clinical and public health practice. Consensus, however, remains elusive regarding their utility for predicting cardiovascular disease risk in multiethnic populations. We address this gap in the literature by analyzing cross-sectional data from the first round of the Los Angeles County Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011. We characterized the relationships between BMI, WC, waist-to-hip ratios, waist-to-height ratios, and chronic disease extent, as confirmed by the presence of hypertension, diabetes, and/or two or more other chronic conditions as defined by a composite indicator 'comorbidity'. To account for race/ethnicity, age, gender, and cigarette smoking frequency, adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were generated and reported for each of the regression analyses. Whereas being overweight was associated with hypertension alone (aOR 2.10; 95% CI 1.12-3.94), obesity was associated with hypertension (aOR 5.04; 95% CI 2.80-9.06) as well as diabetes (aOR 5.28; 95% CI 2.25-12.3) and comorbidity (aOR 3.69; 95% CI 2.02-6.77). In whites and African-Americans, BMI and WC were positively related to diabetes, hypertension and comorbidity. In Hispanics, BMI and WC were also positively related to diabetes and comorbidity, but only the former measure was associated with hypertension (p < 0.050). In Asians, BMI was not a significant predictor of diabetes, hypertension and/or comorbidity. Collectively, the findings suggest that BMI is not universally informative and waist circumference and its derivatives may represent a viable, more racially/ethnically appropriate alternative for use with selected minority groups.
体重指数(BMI)和腰围(WC)是临床和公共卫生实践中常用的两种肥胖人体测量指标。然而,对于它们在多民族人群中预测心血管疾病风险的效用,目前仍未达成共识。我们通过分析2011年洛杉矶县健康与营养检查调查第一轮的横断面数据,填补了这一文献空白。我们确定了BMI、WC、腰臀比、腰高比与慢性病程度之间的关系,慢性病程度通过高血压、糖尿病和/或由综合指标“合并症”定义的两种或更多其他慢性病的存在来确认。为了考虑种族/族裔、年龄、性别和吸烟频率,我们针对每项回归分析生成并报告了调整后的优势比(aOR)。超重仅与高血压相关(aOR 2.10;95%可信区间1.12 - 3.94),而肥胖与高血压(aOR 5.04;95%可信区间2.80 - 9.06)、糖尿病(aOR 5.28;95%可信区间2.25 - 12.3)以及合并症(aOR 3.69;95%可信区间2.02 - 6.77)相关。在白人和非裔美国人中,BMI和WC与糖尿病、高血压和合并症呈正相关。在西班牙裔中,BMI和WC也与糖尿病和合并症呈正相关,但只有前者与高血压相关(p < 0.050)。在亚洲人中,BMI不是糖尿病、高血压和/或合并症的显著预测指标。总体而言,研究结果表明BMI并非普遍适用,腰围及其衍生指标可能是一种可行的、更适合特定少数群体的种族/族裔替代指标。