Suppr超能文献

神经疗法与物理疗法对慢性下腰痛疗效的比较。

Comparison of efficacy of neural therapy and physical therapy in chronic low back pain.

作者信息

Atalay Nilgun Simsir, Sahin Fusun, Atalay Ali, Akkaya Nuray

机构信息

Pamukkale University Medical School, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Denizli, Turkey.

出版信息

Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med. 2013 Apr 12;10(3):431-5. doi: 10.4314/ajtcam.v10i3.8. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the effects of neural therapy, and physical therapy on level of pain, disability, quality of life, and psychological status in patients with chronic low back pain. Patients admitted to the physical therapy and rehabilitation outpatient clinic with the complaint of low back pain of at least 3 months duration. Group 1 (n=27), physical therapy (PT, hotpack, ultrasound, TENS 15 sessions), group 2 (n=33), neural therapy (NT, 1:1 mixture of 20 mg/mL Lidocaine HCl (Jetokain simplex®) and saline for 5 sessions. For pain, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), for disability Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), for quality-of-life Nottingham-Health-Profile (NHP), for depression, and anxiety, Hospital Anxiety-Depression Scale (HADS) were used before and after the treatment. Mean age was 47.3±11.32 years, symptom time was 13.78±11.98 months. There were no differences for demographic variables between groups. Significant improvements were detected for VAS, RMDQ, NHP-Pain, NHP-Physical activity, HADS for both of two groups after treatment. In addition to these findings, significant improvements were found for NHP-Energy, NHP-Social isolation in NT group. The differences of pre- and post-treatment values of parameters were evaluated for each group. Although there were no differences for VAS, NHP-sleep, NHP-Emotional reaction, HADS between groups, RMDQ, NHP-Pain, NHP-Physical activity, NHP-Social isolation were higher in NT than PT before treatment, the improvements for these parameters were better in NT than PT. In conclusion both of NT and PT are effective on pain, function, quality of life, anxiety, and depression in patients with chronic low back pain.

摘要

这项前瞻性研究的目的是评估神经疗法和物理疗法对慢性下腰痛患者的疼痛程度、功能障碍、生活质量和心理状态的影响。因下腰痛至少持续3个月而入住理疗与康复门诊的患者参与了研究。第1组(n = 27)接受物理疗法(PT,热敷、超声、经皮电刺激神经疗法,共15次),第2组(n = 33)接受神经疗法(NT,20 mg/mL盐酸利多卡因(Jetokain simplex®)与生理盐水1:1混合液,共5次)。治疗前后分别使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估疼痛程度,使用罗兰·莫里斯功能障碍问卷(RMDQ)评估功能障碍,使用诺丁汉健康量表(NHP)评估生活质量,使用医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)评估抑郁和焦虑情况。平均年龄为47.3±11.32岁,症状持续时间为13.78±11.98个月。两组间人口统计学变量无差异。治疗后两组的VAS、RMDQ、NHP-疼痛、NHP-身体活动、HADS均有显著改善。除此之外,NT组的NHP-精力、NHP-社会隔离方面也有显著改善。对每组参数治疗前后的值进行差异评估。尽管两组间VAS、NHP-睡眠、NHP-情绪反应、HADS无差异,但治疗前NT组RMDQ、NHP-疼痛、NHP-身体活动、NHP-社会隔离高于PT组,这些参数在NT组的改善情况优于PT组。总之,NT和PT对慢性下腰痛患者的疼痛、功能、生活质量、焦虑和抑郁均有效。

相似文献

1
Comparison of efficacy of neural therapy and physical therapy in chronic low back pain.神经疗法与物理疗法对慢性下腰痛疗效的比较。
Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med. 2013 Apr 12;10(3):431-5. doi: 10.4314/ajtcam.v10i3.8. eCollection 2013.
7
Psychic predictors of outcomes of physical therapy.物理治疗结果的心理预测因素。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(1):71-7. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2012-00352.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Effective physical treatment for chronic low back pain.慢性下腰痛的有效物理治疗。
Orthop Clin North Am. 2004 Jan;35(1):57-64. doi: 10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00088-9.
5

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验