Sports Centre, University of Malaya , Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
J Sports Sci Med. 2013 Sep 1;12(3):489-96. eCollection 2013.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of the 11+ and HarmoKnee warm-up programs on performance measures in professional soccer players. Thirty-six male professional soccer players (age: 18.9 ± 1.4 years) were divided into 3 groups, the 11+, HarmoKnee and control group (n = 12 per group). The experimental groups performed the programs 3 times per week for 2 months (24 sessions), whereas the control group only performed their regular soccer training. The performance tests carried out were: 10m speed tests with and without a ball, 20m single sprint, vertical jump, Wall-Volley and Illinois agility tests. The 11+ group demonstrated significant increases from pre-to-post time points in the vertical jump (3.7%), Wall- Volley (5.4%) and Illinois agility tests (1.7%), while the HarmoKnee group showed a significant increase in Wall-Volley test, with a 5.2% increase. The repeated measures analysis revealed differences between the groups (large effect size) in the 11+ and HarmoKnee groups, compared to the control group, in 10m speed tests with and without a ball, 20m single sprint and Illinois agility tests (p < 0.05). Thus 8-weeks performing the 11+ warm-up program can enhance jump height, agility and soccer skill while the HarmoKnee program generally only improves soccer skill in young professional male soccer players. Key PointsThe 11+ improves performance by means of Illinois agility, vertical jump and Wall-Volley tests whereas HarmoKnee improves Wall-Volley test. Incorporating 11+ as a part of the warm-up program by the young teams would be beneficial in agility, leg power and soccer skill respectively.Further modification of both programs may be required to fully realize the players' speed performance potential.Data from this research can be helpful for soccer trainers in choosing programs to enhance performances in young male professional soccer players.
这项研究的目的是检验 11+和 HarmoKnee 热身方案对职业足球运动员表现指标的影响。36 名男性职业足球运动员(年龄:18.9±1.4 岁)分为 3 组,11+组、HarmoKnee 组和对照组(每组 12 人)。实验组每周进行 3 次训练,持续 2 个月(24 次),而对照组只进行常规足球训练。进行的测试包括:10 米速度测试(带球和不带球)、20 米单步冲刺、垂直跳跃、墙式排球和伊利诺伊州敏捷性测试。11+组在垂直跳跃(3.7%)、墙式排球(5.4%)和伊利诺伊州敏捷性测试(1.7%)方面显示出显著的前后时间点增加,而 HarmoKnee 组在墙式排球测试中显示出显著的增加,增加了 5.2%。重复测量分析显示,与对照组相比,11+组和 HarmoKnee 组在 10 米速度测试(带球和不带球)、20 米单步冲刺和伊利诺伊州敏捷性测试中存在差异(大效应量)(p<0.05)。因此,8 周的 11+热身方案可以提高跳跃高度、敏捷性和足球技能,而 HarmoKnee 方案通常仅提高年轻职业男性足球运动员的足球技能。要点:11+通过伊利诺伊州敏捷性、垂直跳跃和墙式排球测试提高表现,而 HarmoKnee 提高墙式排球测试。年轻球队将 11+纳入热身方案的一部分,将分别有益于敏捷性、腿部力量和足球技能。可能需要进一步修改这两个方案,以充分实现球员的速度表现潜力。本研究的数据可为足球教练在选择方案以提高年轻男性职业足球运动员表现方面提供帮助。