Institute for Sport and Sports Science, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund 44221, Germany.
Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Science, University of Tehran, Kish Island branch, Kish Island 79416, Iran.
J Sport Health Sci. 2023 Mar;12(2):226-235. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2022.05.001. Epub 2022 May 31.
The side effects of the FIFA 11+ program on performance have not been generally reviewed. The objective of this study was to synthesize the literature on the effects of the 11+ on players' performance.
Five online databases (PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Springer, and Google Scholar) were searched (from April 2006 to March 2022) using predefined keywords and sub-keywords. The potential references were primarily recorded through Endnote and imported to Covidence. Out of the 123 references screened by 2 blinded researchers through the software, 59 full texts were assessed for eligibility, 33 of which were ultimately included. The quality of the studies and the risk of bias were then assessed. Study ID, title, place, aim, design, start/end dates, population description, study criteria, statistical analysis, and outcomes were extracted.
Studies were conducted on male and female players aged 10-32 years old. The quality of the studies was moderate to high, and except for unclear bias for blinding outcome assessment, the risk of bias for all domains was low. Long-term application of the 11+ improved most biomechanical measures and physiological responses except for lower extremity stability, ankle evertors time latency, ankle dorsiflexion, and proprioception. Conversely, the 11+ showed acute negative effects on physical performance compared to dynamic warm-ups and non-significant effects on technical abilities.
Mid-to-long-term implementation of the 11+ improved the majority of biomechanical and a couple of physical measures but showed no effects on technical skills. Precaution must be observed for using the 11+ before competitions, as it could acutely decrease physical/technical performance. Given the contradictory nature of the literature, further studies should evaluate the short-to-mid-term effects of the 11+. Further studies are required to address ankle responses to the 11+ intervention.
国际足球联合会 11+ 方案的副作用尚未得到普遍审查。本研究的目的是综合研究 11+ 对运动员表现的影响。
通过预定义的关键词和子关键词,在五个在线数据库(PubMed、Scopus、ScienceDirect、Springer 和 Google Scholar)中进行搜索(从 2006 年 4 月至 2022 年 3 月)。潜在的参考文献主要通过 Endnote 记录,并导入 Covidence。通过软件筛选的 123 篇参考文献中,有 59 篇全文被评估为合格,其中 33 篇最终被纳入。然后评估研究的质量和偏倚风险。提取研究 ID、标题、地点、目的、设计、开始/结束日期、人群描述、研究标准、统计分析和结果。
研究对象为 10-32 岁的男性和女性运动员。研究质量为中等到高度,除了对结果评估的盲法偏倚不明确外,所有领域的偏倚风险都较低。11+ 的长期应用改善了大多数生物力学指标和生理反应,但下肢稳定性、踝关节外翻潜伏期、踝关节背屈和本体感觉除外。相反,与动态热身相比,11+ 在急性时对身体表现有负面影响,对技术能力没有显著影响。
11+ 的中到长期实施改善了大多数生物力学和一些身体指标,但对技术技能没有影响。在比赛前使用 11+ 时必须谨慎,因为它可能会急性降低身体/技术表现。鉴于文献的矛盾性质,应进一步评估 11+ 的短期至中期效果。需要进一步的研究来评估踝关节对 11+ 干预的反应。