• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

首次对非细胞因子刺激供体中的新型白细胞分离技术进行比较评估。

First comparative evaluation of a new leukapheresis technology in non-cytokine-stimulated donors.

机构信息

Transfusion Medicine and Haemostaseology Department, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

Vox Sang. 2014 Apr;106(3):248-55. doi: 10.1111/vox.12102. Epub 2013 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1111/vox.12102
PMID:24152115
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Leukapheresis is an important source for mononuclear cells (MNCs) used in adoptive immunotherapies. Differences in the apheresis technology concerning physical conditions during cell separation and the optical detection system can affect the product's cellular content.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a paired analysis, twenty healthy non-cytokine-stimulated donors underwent MNC collection at the Spectra Optia (Terumo BCT, Lakewood, CO, USA) and the COM.TEC (Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany) device. In twelve donors, apheresis was additionally performed with the Amicus (Fenwal Inc., Lake Zurich, IL, USA). Donor response to leukapheresis and product composition was compared.

RESULTS

Mean yields of CD14+ (CD3+) cells were 1·64±0·70x10(9) (2·36±0·96×10(9)) in the Spectra Optia, 1·45±0·50×10(9) (3·03±1·04×10(9)) in the COM.TEC and 1·20±0·37×10(9) (2·80±1·00×10(9)) in the Amicus products, respectively. The Spectra Optia collected significantly more CD14+ monocytes than the Amicus and significantly less CD3+ T cells than the COM.TEC (P=0·002 and P=0·021). Apheresis products of the Spectra Optia showed the significantly lowest red blood cell yields while the Amicus generated products with the significantly lowest platelet contents.

CONCLUSIONS

Leukaphereses with the three devices resulted in almost equal total MNC yields. MNC products of the Spectra Optia and the Amicus could be used in preference for the monocyte enrichment by the Elutra system and the leukapheresis procedures could be also favourably applied in patients with low platelet counts. The COM.TEC is more efficient in monocyte and T-cell collection with the disadvantage of high residual non-target cell content in the products.

摘要

背景与目的

白细胞分离术是过继免疫治疗中使用的单核细胞(MNC)的重要来源。细胞分离过程中的物理条件和光学检测系统的差异会影响产品的细胞含量。

材料与方法

在一项配对分析中,二十名健康的非细胞因子刺激供者在 Spectra Optia(Terumo BCT,Lakewood,CO,USA)和 COM.TEC(Fresenius Kabi,Bad Homburg,Germany)仪器上进行 MNC 采集。在十二名供者中,还用 Amicus(Fenwal Inc.,Lake Zurich,IL,USA)进行了白细胞分离术。比较了供者对白细胞分离术的反应和产品组成。

结果

Spectra Optia 的 CD14+(CD3+)细胞平均产量为 1.64±0.70x10(9)(2.36±0.96×10(9)),COM.TEC 为 1.45±0.50x10(9)(3.03±1.04×10(9)),Amicus 为 1.20±0.37x10(9)(2.80±1.00×10(9))。Spectra Optia 收集的 CD14+单核细胞明显多于 Amicus,而 CD3+T 细胞明显少于 COM.TEC(P=0.002 和 P=0.021)。Spectra Optia 的白细胞分离术产物红细胞产量最低,而 Amicus 生成的血小板含量最低。

结论

三种仪器的白细胞分离术几乎产生了相同的总 MNC 产量。Spectra Optia 和 Amicus 的 MNC 产品可以通过 Elutra 系统优先用于单核细胞富集,并且白细胞分离术也可以在血小板计数低的患者中有利地应用。COM.TEC 在收集单核细胞和 T 细胞方面更有效,但产品中残留的非靶细胞含量较高。

相似文献

1
First comparative evaluation of a new leukapheresis technology in non-cytokine-stimulated donors.首次对非细胞因子刺激供体中的新型白细胞分离技术进行比较评估。
Vox Sang. 2014 Apr;106(3):248-55. doi: 10.1111/vox.12102. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
2
Leukapheresis in non-cytokine-stimulated donors with a new apheresis system: first-time collection results and evaluation of subsequent cryopreservation.新型体外分离系统在非细胞因子刺激供者中的应用:首次采集结果及后续冻存评估。
Transfusion. 2013 Apr;53(4):747-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03787.x. Epub 2012 Jul 15.
3
Evolution of MNC and lymphocyte collection settings employing different Spectra Optia Leukapheresis systems.采用不同Spectra Optia白细胞分离系统的跨国公司和淋巴细胞采集设置的演变。
Vox Sang. 2017 Aug;112(6):586-594. doi: 10.1111/vox.12540. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
4
Mononuclear cell variability and recruitment in non-cytokine-stimulated donors after serial 10-liter leukapheresis procedures.连续进行10升白细胞单采程序后,非细胞因子刺激供体中的单核细胞变异性和募集情况。
Transfusion. 2005 Mar;45(3):445-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.04202.x.
5
First comparative analysis concerning the plasma platelet contamination during MNC collection.关于单核细胞采集过程中血浆血小板污染的首次比较分析。
Transfus Apher Sci. 2017 Aug;56(4):535-538. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
6
Evaluation of the Spectra Optia apheresis system for mononuclear cell (MNC) collection in G-CSF mobilized and nonmobilized healthy donors: results of a multicenter study.G-CSF动员和未动员的健康供体中使用Spectra Optia单采系统采集单个核细胞(MNC)的评估:一项多中心研究结果
J Clin Apher. 2014 Oct;29(5):273-80. doi: 10.1002/jca.21319. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
7
Automated CD14+ monocyte collection with the autoMNC program of the COM.TEC cell separator.使用COM.TEC细胞分离器的autoMNC程序自动采集CD14+单核细胞。
Transfusion. 2007 Dec;47(12):2297-304. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01471.x. Epub 2007 Aug 30.
8
Comparison of two mononuclear cell program settings on two apheresis devices intended to collect high yields of CD14+ and CD3+ cells.两种用于采集高产量CD14+和CD3+细胞的单采设备上两种单核细胞程序设置的比较。
Transfusion. 2004 Jul;44(7):1104-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2004.03406.x.
9
Prospective randomized and crossover comparison of two apheresis machines for peripheral blood stem cell collection: a multicenter study.两种血液成分分离机用于外周血干细胞采集的前瞻性随机交叉比较:一项多中心研究。
Transfusion. 2016 Nov;56(11):2839-2847. doi: 10.1111/trf.13777. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
10
Unstimulated leukapheresis in patients and donors: comparison of two apheresis systems.患者和供者的非刺激白细胞单采术:两种单采系统的比较。
Transfusion. 2014 Jun;54(6):1622-9. doi: 10.1111/trf.12506. Epub 2013 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Retrospective comparison of two different cell separators for autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection: Single center experience.两种不同细胞分离机用于自体外周血干细胞采集的回顾性比较:单中心经验
Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2024 Oct-Dec;46(4):335-339. doi: 10.1016/j.htct.2023.02.004. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
2
Get Off on the Right Foot: How to Plan an Efficient Leukocytapheresis to Collect T Cells for CAR T-Cell Manufacturing.迈出正确的第一步:如何规划高效的白细胞去除术以采集用于CAR-T细胞制造的T细胞。
Transfus Med Hemother. 2022 Dec 22;50(2):98-104. doi: 10.1159/000528331. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
A guide to the collection of T-cells by apheresis for ATMP manufacturing-recommendations of the GoCART coalition apheresis working group.
用于高级治疗用医药产品(ATMP)生产的单采法采集T细胞指南——GoCART联盟单采工作组的建议
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2023 Jul;58(7):742-748. doi: 10.1038/s41409-023-01957-x. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
4
Low-Volume Leukapheresis in Non-Cytokine-Stimulated Donors for the Collection of Mononuclear Cells.在非细胞因子刺激供体中进行低容量白细胞分离术以采集单核细胞
Transfus Med Hemother. 2018 Oct;45(5):323-330. doi: 10.1159/000490859. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
5
GMP-production of purified human B lymphocytes for the adoptive transfer in patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.GMP 生产纯化的人 B 淋巴细胞,用于异基因造血干细胞移植后患者的过继转移。
J Transl Med. 2017 Nov 7;15(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12967-017-1330-5.
6
Optimizing peripheral blood stem cells transplantation outcome through amend relapse and graft failure: a review of current literature.通过改善复发和移植物失败来优化外周血干细胞移植结果:当前文献综述
Exp Hematol Oncol. 2017 Aug 9;6:24. doi: 10.1186/s40164-017-0082-5. eCollection 2017.
7
Erythrocyte depletion from bone marrow: performance evaluation after 50 clinical-scale depletions with Spectra Optia BMC.从骨髓中去除红细胞:Spectra Optia BMC 进行 50 次临床规模去除后的性能评估。
J Transl Med. 2017 Aug 11;15(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12967-017-1277-6.
8
Genetic Engineering and Manufacturing of Hematopoietic Stem Cells.造血干细胞的基因工程与制造
Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2017 Mar 18;5:96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.omtm.2017.03.003. eCollection 2017 Jun 16.