Hahm Bong-Jin, Jo Booil, Dhabhar Firdaus S, Palesh Oxana, Aldridge-Gerry Arianna, Bajestan Sepideh N, Neri Eric, Nouriani Bita, Spiegel David, Zeitzer Jamie M
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, CA , USA .
Chronobiol Int. 2014 Mar;31(2):214-21. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2013.842575. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
Disruption of circadian rhythms, which frequently occurs during night shift work, may be associated with cancer progression. The effect of chronotype (preference for behaviors such as sleep, work, or exercise to occur at particular times of day, with an associated difference in circadian physiology) and alignment of bedtime (preferred vs. habitual), however, have not yet been studied in the context of cancer progression in women with breast cancer. Chronotype and alignment of actual bedtime with preferred chronotype were examined using the Morningness-Eveningness Scale (MEQ) and sleep-wake log among 85 women with metastatic breast cancer. Their association with disease-free interval (DFI) was retrospectively examined using the Cox proportional hazards model. Median DFI was 81.9 months for women with aligned bedtimes ("going to bed at preferred bedtime") (n = 72), and 46.9 months for women with misaligned bedtimes ("going to bed later or earlier than the preferred bedtime") (n = 13) (log rank p = 0.001). In a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, after controlling for other significant predictors of DFI, including chronotype (morning type/longer DFI; HR = 0.539, 95% CI = 0.320-0.906, p = 0.021), estrogen receptor (ER) status at initial diagnosis (negative/shorter DFI; HR = 2.169, 95% CI = 1.124-4.187, p = 0.028) and level of natural-killer cell count (lower levels/shorter DFI; HR = 1.641, 95% CI = 1.000-2.695, p = 0.050), misaligned bedtimes was associated with shorter DFI, compared to aligned bedtimes (HR = 3.180, 95% CI = 1.327-7.616, p = 0.018). Our data indicate that a misalignment of bedtime on a daily basis, an indication of circadian disruption, is associated with more rapid breast cancer progression as measured by DFI. Considering the limitations of small sample size and study design, a prospective study with a larger sample is necessary to explore their causal relationship and underlying mechanisms.
昼夜节律紊乱在夜班工作期间经常发生,可能与癌症进展有关。然而,在乳腺癌女性患者的癌症进展背景下,尚未研究昼夜类型(对睡眠、工作或锻炼等行为在一天中特定时间发生的偏好,以及昼夜生理的相关差异)和就寝时间的一致性(偏好与习惯)。使用晨型-夜型量表(MEQ)和睡眠-觉醒日志对85例转移性乳腺癌女性患者的昼夜类型以及实际就寝时间与偏好昼夜类型的一致性进行了检查。使用Cox比例风险模型回顾性研究了它们与无病生存期(DFI)的关联。就寝时间一致(“在偏好的就寝时间上床睡觉”)的女性患者(n = 72)的中位DFI为81.9个月,就寝时间不一致(“比偏好的就寝时间晚睡或早睡”)的女性患者(n = 13)的中位DFI为46.9个月(对数秩检验p = 0.001)。在多变量Cox比例风险模型中,在控制了DFI的其他重要预测因素后,包括昼夜类型(晨型/DFI更长;风险比[HR] = 0.539,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.320 - 0.906,p = 0.021)、初始诊断时的雌激素受体(ER)状态(阴性/DFI更短;HR = 2.169,95% CI = 1.124 - 4.187,p = 0.028)和自然杀伤细胞计数水平(较低水平/DFI更短;HR = 1.641,95% CI = 1.000 - 2.695,p = 0.050),与就寝时间一致相比,就寝时间不一致与更短的DFI相关(HR = 3.180,95% CI = 1.327 - 7.616,p = 0.018)。我们的数据表明,日常就寝时间不一致,即昼夜节律紊乱的一个指标,与以DFI衡量的更快的乳腺癌进展相关。考虑到样本量小和研究设计的局限性,有必要进行一项更大样本的前瞻性研究来探索它们的因果关系和潜在机制。