a Division of General Internal Medicine , University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco , California , USA.
Subst Abus. 2013;34(4):344-9. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2013.787958.
Evaluations of substance use screening and brief intervention (SBI) curricula typically focus on learner attitudes and knowledge, although effects on clinical skills are of greater interest and utility. Moreover, these curricula often require large amounts of training time and teaching resources. This study examined whether a 3-hour SBI curriculum for internal medicine residents utilizing a team-based learning (TBL) format is effective for SBI skills as measured by a standardized patient (SP) assessment.
A waitlist-controlled design was employed.
Twenty-four postgraduate year 2 (PGY-2) and PGY-3 residents participated in a SP assessment prior to the TBL session (waitlist control group) and 32 participated in a SP assessment after the TBL session (intervention group). The intervention residents demonstrated better brief intervention skills than waitlist control residents, but there were no differences between the groups in screening and assessment skills. Residents receiving the TBL curriculum prior to the SP assessment reported increased confidence in all SBI skills.
Findings indicate that a brief educational intervention can improve brief intervention skills. However, more intensive education may be needed to improve substance use screening and assessment.
评估物质使用筛查和简短干预(SBI)课程通常侧重于学习者的态度和知识,尽管对临床技能的影响更具兴趣和实用价值。此外,这些课程通常需要大量的培训时间和教学资源。本研究考察了一种针对内科住院医师的 3 小时 SBI 课程,该课程采用团队学习(TBL)格式,是否能通过标准化患者(SP)评估有效提高 SBI 技能。
采用等待对照设计。
24 名 PGY-2 和 PGY-3 住院医师在 TBL 课程前进行了 SP 评估(等待对照组),32 名住院医师在 TBL 课程后进行了 SP 评估(干预组)。干预组住院医师的简短干预技能优于等待对照组住院医师,但两组在筛查和评估技能方面没有差异。在进行 SP 评估之前接受 TBL 课程的住院医师报告称,他们对所有 SBI 技能的信心都有所增强。
研究结果表明,简短的教育干预可以提高简短干预技能。然而,可能需要更密集的教育来提高物质使用筛查和评估技能。