Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA; Research Imaging Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Jun;22(6):1439-46. doi: 10.1002/oby.20659.
The purpose of this study was to compare the results of the three food-cue paradigms most commonly used for functional neuroimaging studies to determine: i) commonalities and differences in the neural response patterns by paradigm and ii) the relative robustness and reliability of responses to each paradigm.
Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies using standardized stereotactic coordinates to report brain responses to food cues were identified using online databases. Studies were grouped by food-cue modality as: i) tastes (8 studies); ii) odors (8 studies); and, iii) images (11 studies). Activation likelihood estimation was used to identify statistically reliable regional responses within each stimulation paradigm.
Brain response distributions were distinctly different for the three stimulation modalities, corresponding to known differences in location of the respective primary and associative cortices. Visual stimulation induced the most robust and extensive responses. The left anterior insula was the only brain region reliably responding to all three stimulus categories.
These findings suggest visual food-cue paradigm as promising candidate for imaging studies addressing the neural substrate of therapeutic interventions.
本研究旨在比较三种常用于功能神经影像学研究的食物线索范式的结果,以确定:i)各范式的神经反应模式的异同,ii)对每种范式的反应的相对稳健性和可靠性。
使用标准化的立体定向坐标,通过在线数据库确定使用食物线索刺激的功能磁共振成像研究。研究根据食物线索模式进行分组:i)口味(8 项研究);ii)气味(8 项研究);iii)图像(11 项研究)。激活似然估计用于确定每个刺激范式内的统计学上可靠的区域反应。
三种刺激模式的大脑反应分布明显不同,这与各自初级和联合皮质的位置差异相对应。视觉刺激引起的反应最强烈和广泛。左侧前岛叶是唯一对所有三种刺激类别都有反应的脑区。
这些发现表明,视觉食物线索范式有望成为治疗干预神经基础成像研究的候选者。