Global Health Group, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, USA.
Malar J. 2013 Nov 1;12:383. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-383.
Recent progress in malaria control has caused renewed interest in mass drug administration (MDA) as a potential elimination strategy but the evidence base is limited. China has extensive experience with MDA, but it is not well documented.
An ecological study was conducted to describe the use of MDA for the control and elimination of Plasmodium vivax in Jiangsu Province and explore the association between MDA and malaria incidence. Two periods were focused on: 1973 to 1983 when malaria burden was high and MDA administered to highly endemic counties province-wide, and 2000 to 2009, when malaria burden was low and a focal approach was used in two counties. All available data about the strategies implemented, MDA coverage, co-interventions, incidence, and adverse events were collected and described. Joinpoint analysis was used to describe trends in incidence and the relationship between MDA coverage and incidence was explored in negative binomial regression models.
From 1973 to 1983, MDA with pyrimethamine and primaquine was used on a large scale, with up to 30 million people in target counties covered in a peak year (50% of the total population). Joinpoint analyses identified declines in annual incidence, -56.7% (95% CI -75.5 to -23.7%) from 1973-1976 and -12.4% (95% CI -24.7 to 2.0%) from 1976-1983. Population average negative binomial models identified a relationship between higher total population MDA coverage and lower monthly incidence from 1973-1976, IRR 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.00), while co-interventions, rainfall and GDP were not associated. From 2000-2009, incidence in two counties declined (annual change -43.7 to -14.0%) during a time when focal MDA using chloroquine and primaquine was targeted to villages and/or individuals residing near passively detected index cases (median 0.04% of total population). Although safety data were not collected systematically, there were rare reports of serious but non-fatal events.
In Jiangsu Province, China, large-scale MDA was implemented and associated with declines in high P. vivax malaria transmission; a more recent focal approach may have contributed to interruption of transmission. MDA should be considered a potential key strategy for malaria control and elimination.
疟疾控制方面的最新进展使大规模药物治疗(MDA)作为一种潜在的消除策略重新受到关注,但证据基础有限。中国在 MDA 方面有着丰富的经验,但记录不详。
采用生态学研究方法,描述江苏省采用 MDA 控制和消除间日疟的情况,并探讨 MDA 与疟疾发病率之间的关系。重点关注两个时期:1973 年至 1983 年疟疾负担较重,MDA 广泛用于高流行县;2000 年至 2009 年疟疾负担较低,在两个县采用重点方法。收集和描述了关于实施策略、MDA 覆盖率、联合干预、发病率和不良事件的所有可用数据。采用 Joinpoint 分析描述发病率趋势,并在负二项回归模型中探讨 MDA 覆盖率与发病率之间的关系。
1973 年至 1983 年,大规模使用乙氨嘧啶和伯氨喹进行 MDA,高峰年份有多达 3000 万人在目标县接受治疗(占总人口的 50%)。Joinpoint 分析发现,1973 年至 1976 年,年发病率下降 56.7%(95%CI-75.5 至-23.7%),1976 年至 1983 年下降 12.4%(95%CI-24.7 至 2.0%)。人群平均负二项模型表明,1973 年至 1976 年,较高的总人口 MDA 覆盖率与较低的月发病率之间存在关联,IRR 为 0.98(95%CI 0.97 至 1.00),而联合干预、降雨量和 GDP 则没有关联。2000 年至 2009 年,两个县的发病率下降(年变化率-43.7 至-14.0%),在此期间,采用氯喹和伯氨喹的重点 MDA 针对村庄和/或被动检测到的索引病例附近居住的个人(中位数为总人口的 0.04%)。尽管没有系统地收集安全性数据,但有罕见的严重但非致命事件报告。
在中国江苏省,大规模 MDA 的实施与高间日疟传播的下降有关;最近的重点方法可能有助于阻断传播。MDA 应被视为疟疾控制和消除的潜在关键策略。