Suppr超能文献

红景天提取物预防急性高原病:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉试验

Rhodiola crenulata extract for prevention of acute mountain sickness: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial.

作者信息

Chiu Te-Fa, Chen Lisa Li-Chuan, Su Deng-Huang, Lo Hsiang-Yun, Chen Chung-Hsien, Wang Shih-Hao, Chen Wei-Lung

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Wu-Hsing Street, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

BMC Complement Altern Med. 2013 Oct 31;13:298. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-13-298.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rhodiola crenulata (R. crenulata) is widely used to prevent acute mountain sickness in the Himalayan areas and in Tibet, but no scientific studies have previously examined its effectiveness. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study to investigate its efficacy in acute mountain sickness prevention.

METHODS

Healthy adult volunteers were randomized to 2 treatment sequences, receiving either 800 mg R. crenulata extract or placebo daily for 7 days before ascent and 2 days during mountaineering, before crossing over to the alternate treatment after a 3-month wash-out period. Participants ascended rapidly from 250 m to 3421 m on two separate occasions: December 2010 and April 2011. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of acute mountain sickness, as defined by a Lake Louise score ≥ 3, with headache and at least one of the symptoms of nausea or vomiting, fatigue, dizziness, or difficulty sleeping.

RESULTS

One hundred and two participants completed the trial. There were no demographic differences between individuals taking Rhodiola-placebo and those taking placebo-Rhodiola. No significant differences in the incidence of acute mountain sickness were found between R. crenulata extract and placebo groups (all 60.8%; adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.69-1.52). The incidence of severe acute mountain sickness in Rhodiola extract vs. placebo groups was 35.3% vs. 29.4% (AOR = 1.42, 95% CI = 0.90-2.25).

CONCLUSIONS

R. crenulata extract was not effective in reducing the incidence or severity of acute mountain sickness as compared to placebo.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01536288.

摘要

背景

红景天在喜马拉雅地区和西藏被广泛用于预防急性高原病,但此前尚无科学研究检验其有效性。我们开展了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的交叉研究,以调查其预防急性高原病的疗效。

方法

健康成年志愿者被随机分为2个治疗序列,在登山前7天及登山期间2天,每天服用800毫克红景天提取物或安慰剂,在3个月的洗脱期后交叉接受另一种治疗。参与者于2010年12月和2011年4月分两次从250米迅速攀升至3421米。主要结局指标为急性高原病的发病率,根据路易斯湖评分≥3定义,伴有头痛以及恶心或呕吐、疲劳、头晕或睡眠困难症状中的至少一种。

结果

102名参与者完成了试验。服用红景天-安慰剂的个体与服用安慰剂-红景天的个体在人口统计学上无差异。红景天提取物组和安慰剂组在急性高原病发病率上无显著差异(均为60.8%;调整优势比(AOR)=1.02,95%置信区间(CI)=0.69-1.52)。红景天提取物组与安慰剂组的严重急性高原病发病率分别为35.3%和29.4%(AOR=1.42,95%CI=0.90-2.25)。

结论

与安慰剂相比,红景天提取物在降低急性高原病的发病率或严重程度方面无效。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01536288。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a751/4228457/6222282bd8b3/1472-6882-13-298-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验