Suppr超能文献

两种用于检测人类疟疾的巢式PCR方法的比较。

Comparison of two nested PCR methods for the detection of human malaria.

作者信息

Anthony C, Mahmud R, Lau Y L, Syedomar S F, Sri La Sri Ponnampalavanar S

机构信息

Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

Trop Biomed. 2013 Sep;30(3):459-66.

Abstract

Battling malaria will be a persistent struggle without the proper means to diagnose the parasitic infection. However, the inherent limitations of microscopy, the conventional method of diagnosing malaria, affect the accuracy of diagnosis. The present study aimed to compare the accuracy of two different set of primers targeting the small subunit ribosomal RNA (ssRNA) and the dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase linker region (dhfr-ts) in detecting species specific malaria infections by nested PCR. The sensitivity and specificity of nested PCR assay using the two primers were calculated with reference to microscopy as the 'gold standard'. The results show that 18S rRNA primers had 91.9% sensitivity and 100% specificity in detecting human Plasmodium species as opposed to dhfr-ts primers which had 51.4% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The higher sensitivity of 18S rRNA primers suggests that it may be a better diagnostic tool for detecting human malaria.

摘要

如果没有合适的手段来诊断寄生虫感染,抗击疟疾将是一场持久的斗争。然而,传统的疟疾诊断方法——显微镜检查存在固有限制,会影响诊断的准确性。本研究旨在比较针对小亚基核糖体RNA(ssRNA)和二氢叶酸还原酶-胸苷酸合成酶连接区(dhfr-ts)的两组不同引物,通过巢式PCR检测特定种类疟疾感染的准确性。以显微镜检查作为“金标准”,计算使用这两种引物的巢式PCR检测的灵敏度和特异性。结果显示,18S rRNA引物在检测人类疟原虫种类时灵敏度为91.9%,特异性为100%,而dhfr-ts引物的灵敏度为51.4%,特异性为100%。18S rRNA引物较高的灵敏度表明它可能是检测人类疟疾的更好诊断工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验