• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蜜蜂会有选择地回避困难的选择。

Honey bees selectively avoid difficult choices.

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 19;110(47):19155-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314571110. Epub 2013 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1314571110
PMID:24191024
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3839751/
Abstract

Human decision-making strategies are strongly influenced by an awareness of certainty or uncertainty (a form of metacognition) to increase the chances of making a right choice. Humans seek more information and defer choosing when they realize they have insufficient information to make an accurate decision, but whether animals are aware of uncertainty is currently highly contentious. To explore this issue, we examined how honey bees (Apis mellifera) responded to a visual discrimination task that varied in difficulty between trials. Free-flying bees were rewarded for a correct choice, punished for an incorrect choice, or could avoid choosing by exiting the trial (opting out). Bees opted out more often on difficult trials, and opting out improved their proportion of successful trials. Bees could also transfer the concept of opting out to a novel task. Our data show that bees selectively avoid difficult tasks they lack the information to solve. This finding has been considered as evidence that nonhuman animals can assess the certainty of a predicted outcome, and bees' performance was comparable to that of primates in a similar paradigm. We discuss whether these behavioral results prove bees react to uncertainty or whether associative mechanisms can explain such findings. To better frame metacognition as an issue for neurobiological investigation, we propose a neurobiological hypothesis of uncertainty monitoring based on the known circuitry of the honey bee brain.

摘要

人类的决策策略受到对确定性或不确定性的认知(一种元认知形式)的强烈影响,以增加做出正确选择的机会。当人类意识到自己没有足够的信息来做出准确的决策时,他们会寻求更多的信息并推迟选择,但动物是否意识到不确定性目前仍存在很大争议。为了探讨这个问题,我们研究了蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)如何对视觉辨别任务做出反应,该任务在试验之间存在难度变化。自由飞行的蜜蜂因正确选择而获得奖励,因错误选择而受到惩罚,或者可以通过退出试验(选择退出)来避免选择。蜜蜂在困难的试验中选择退出的次数更多,选择退出可以提高它们成功试验的比例。蜜蜂还可以将选择退出的概念转移到新任务上。我们的数据表明,蜜蜂会选择性地避免他们缺乏信息来解决的困难任务。这一发现被认为是动物可以评估预测结果的确定性的证据,而且蜜蜂在类似的范式中的表现与灵长类动物相当。我们讨论了这些行为结果是否证明蜜蜂对不确定性做出反应,或者联想机制是否可以解释这些发现。为了更好地将元认知作为神经生物学研究的一个问题来阐述,我们提出了一个基于蜜蜂大脑已知回路的不确定性监测的神经生物学假设。

相似文献

1
Honey bees selectively avoid difficult choices.蜜蜂会有选择地回避困难的选择。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 19;110(47):19155-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314571110. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
2
How honey bees make fast and accurate decisions.蜜蜂如何快速准确地做出决策。
Elife. 2023 Jun 27;12:e86176. doi: 10.7554/eLife.86176.
3
Aminergic neuromodulation of associative visual learning in harnessed honey bees.被束缚的蜜蜂的关联视觉学习的胺能神经调制。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2018 Nov;155:556-567. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2018.05.014. Epub 2018 May 21.
4
Visual associative learning in restrained honey bees with intact antennae.有完整触角束缚的蜜蜂的视觉联想学习。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e37666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037666. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
5
High-Speed Videography Reveals How Honeybees Can Turn a Spatial Concept Learning Task Into a Simple Discrimination Task by Stereotyped Flight Movements and Sequential Inspection of Pattern Elements.高速摄像揭示了蜜蜂如何通过刻板的飞行运动和对图案元素的顺序检查,将空间概念学习任务转化为简单的辨别任务。
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 3;9:1347. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01347. eCollection 2018.
6
Conspecific and interspecific stimuli reduce initial performance in an aversive learning task in honey bees (Apis mellifera).同种和异种刺激物会降低蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)在厌恶学习任务中的初始表现。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 25;15(2):e0228161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228161. eCollection 2020.
7
Operant Conditioning in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera L.): The Cap Pushing Response.蜜蜂(意大利蜜蜂)的操作性条件反射:帽推反应
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 14;11(9):e0162347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162347. eCollection 2016.
8
Color-dependent learning in restrained Africanized honey bees.受限制的非洲化蜜蜂的颜色依赖学习。
J Exp Biol. 2014 Feb 1;217(Pt 3):337-43. doi: 10.1242/jeb.091355. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
9
A test of transitive inferences in free-flying honeybees: unsuccessful performance due to memory constraints.自由飞行蜜蜂的传递性推理测试:因记忆限制而表现不佳。
Learn Mem. 2004 May-Jun;11(3):328-36. doi: 10.1101/lm.72204.
10
Hygienic behavior of the honey bee (Apis mellifera) is independent of sucrose responsiveness and foraging ontogeny.蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)的卫生行为独立于蔗糖反应性和觅食个体发育。
Horm Behav. 2006 Mar;49(3):391-7. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.08.007. Epub 2005 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Interpreting insect behavior through the lens of executive functions.从执行功能的角度解读昆虫行为。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2025 Aug 4;19:1638374. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1638374. eCollection 2025.
2
Honeybee Sentience: Scientific Evidence and Implications for EU Animal Welfare Policy.蜜蜂的感知能力:科学证据及其对欧盟动物福利政策的影响。
Vet Sci. 2025 Jul 12;12(7):661. doi: 10.3390/vetsci12070661.
3
When does metacognition evolve in the opt-out paradigm?元认知在“选择退出”范式中何时发展?
Anim Cogn. 2024 Oct 22;27(1):68. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01910-5.
4
Flexible information-seeking in chimpanzees.黑猩猩灵活的信息获取方式。
Cognition. 2024 Oct;251:105898. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105898. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
5
The Cultural Evolution of Games of Chance : A Historical Investigation of Chinese Gambling.赌博游戏的文化演变:中国赌博的历史考察。
Hum Nat. 2024 Jun;35(2):89-113. doi: 10.1007/s12110-024-09471-9. Epub 2024 May 31.
6
Hoarding titmice predominantly use Familiarity, and not Recollection, when remembering cache locations.贮藏癖山雀主要通过熟悉度,而不是回忆,来记住藏食地点。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Nov;26(6):1929-1943. doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01829-3. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
7
How can we apply decision-making theories to wild animal behavior? Predictions arising from dual process theory and Bayesian decision theory.我们如何将决策理论应用于野生动物行为?来自双过程理论和贝叶斯决策理论的预测。
Am J Primatol. 2025 Jan;87(1):e23565. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23565. Epub 2023 Oct 15.
8
Complex preference relationships between native and non-native angiosperms and foraging insect visitors in a suburban greenspace under field and laboratory conditions.在野外和实验室条件下,城郊绿地中乡土和非乡土被子植物与觅食昆虫访客之间复杂的偏好关系。
Naturwissenschaften. 2023 May 4;110(3):16. doi: 10.1007/s00114-023-01846-9.
9
Under pressure: the interaction between high-stakes contexts and individual differences in decision-making in humans and non-human species.压力下:人类和非人类物种中高风险情境与决策个体差异之间的相互作用。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Jul;26(4):1103-1117. doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01768-z. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
10
Great apes and human children rationally monitor their decisions.大型猿类和人类儿童会理性地监控自己的决策。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Mar 30;289(1971):20212686. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2686. Epub 2022 Mar 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Metacognition in animals.动物的元认知
Comp Cogn Behav Rev. 2009;4:1-16. doi: 10.3819/ccbr.2009.40001.
2
A computational framework for understanding decision making through integration of basic learning rules.通过整合基本学习规则来理解决策的计算框架。
J Neurosci. 2013 Mar 27;33(13):5686-97. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4145-12.2013.
3
Information-seeking behavior: exploring metacognitive control in pigeons.信息寻求行为:探索鸽子的元认知控制。
Anim Cogn. 2013 Mar;16(2):241-54. doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0569-8. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
4
Neural mechanisms of reward in insects.昆虫的奖赏神经机制。
Annu Rev Entomol. 2013;58:543-62. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153631. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
5
Inhibition in multiclass classification.多类分类中的抑制。
Neural Comput. 2012 Sep;24(9):2473-507. doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_00321. Epub 2012 May 17.
6
Metacognitive monkeys or associative animals? Simple reinforcement learning explains uncertainty in nonhuman animals.是具反省思维的猴子还是联想动物?简单的强化学习解释了非人类动物的不确定性。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 May;38(3):686-708. doi: 10.1037/a0026478. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
7
"Play it Again": a new method for testing metacognition in animals.“再来一次”:一种测试动物元认知的新方法。
Anim Cogn. 2012 Mar;15(2):187-99. doi: 10.1007/s10071-011-0445-y. Epub 2011 Sep 11.
8
Information seeking by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).恒河猴(Macaca mulatta)和卷尾猴(Cebus apella)的信息寻求行为。
Cognition. 2011 Jul;120(1):90-105. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.02.016. Epub 2011 Apr 2.
9
Mushroom body output neurons encode odor-reward associations.蘑菇体输出神经元编码气味-奖励关联。
J Neurosci. 2011 Feb 23;31(8):3129-40. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2583-10.2011.
10
Conceptualization of above and below relationships by an insect.昆虫对上下关系的概念化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Mar 22;278(1707):898-905. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1891. Epub 2010 Nov 10.