Suppr超能文献

脑卒中治疗学术产业圆桌会议:神经血栓切除术器械评估的研究重点。

Stroke treatment academic industry roundtable: research priorities in the assessment of neurothrombectomy devices.

机构信息

From the Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (J.L.S.); Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Stroke Institute, PA (T.G.J.); Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco (W.S.S.); and Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA (G.W.A.).

出版信息

Stroke. 2013 Dec;44(12):3596-601. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002769. Epub 2013 Nov 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The goal of the Stroke Treatment Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) meetings is to advance the development of stroke therapies. At STAIR VIII, consensus recommendations were developed for clinical trial strategies to demonstrate the benefit of endovascular reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke.

SUMMARY OF REVIEW

Prospects for success with forthcoming endovascular trials are robust, because new neurothrombectomy devices have superior reperfusion efficacy compared with earlier-generation interventions. Specific recommendations are provided for trial designs in 3 populations: (1) patients undergoing intravenous fibrinolysis, (2) early patients ineligible for or having failed intravenous fibrinolysis, and (3) wake-up and other late-presenting patients. Among intravenous fibrinolysis-eligible patients, key principles are that CT or MRI confirmation of target arterial occlusions should precede randomization; endovascular intervention should be pursued with the greatest rapidity possible; and combined intravenous and neurothrombectomy therapy is more promising than neurothrombectomy alone. Among patients ineligible for or having failed intravenous fibrinolysis, scientific equipoise was affirmed and the need to randomize all eligible patients emphasized. Vessel imaging to confirm occlusion is mandatory, and infarct core and penumbral imaging is desirable in later time windows. Additional STAIR VIII recommendations include approaches to test multiple devices in a single trial, utility weighting of disability end points, and adaptive designs to delineate time and tissue injury thresholds at which benefits from intervention no longer accrue.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular research priorities in acute ischemic stroke are to perform trials testing new, highly effective neuro thrombectomy devices rapidly deployed in patients confirmed to have target vessel occlusions.

摘要

背景与目的

Stroke Treatment Academic Industry Roundtable(STAIR)会议的目标是推进中风治疗的发展。在第八届 STAIR 会议上,针对急性缺血性中风血管内再灌注治疗的临床试验策略制定了共识建议。

综述摘要

即将进行的血管内试验取得成功的前景非常乐观,因为新型神经血栓切除术设备与早期干预措施相比具有更好的再灌注效果。为 3 个人群的试验设计提供了具体建议:(1)接受静脉溶栓治疗的患者;(2)不符合静脉溶栓条件或静脉溶栓失败的早期患者;(3)觉醒和其他迟发患者。在符合静脉溶栓条件的患者中,关键原则是 CT 或 MRI 应在随机分组前确认目标动脉闭塞;应尽快进行血管内介入治疗;静脉溶栓联合神经血栓切除术治疗比单纯神经血栓切除术更有前景。对于不符合静脉溶栓条件或静脉溶栓失败的患者,确认了科学上的均势,并强调应随机分配所有符合条件的患者。血管成像以确认闭塞是强制性的,在较晚的时间窗内进行梗死核心和半影成像也是可取的。第八届 STAIR 的其他建议包括在单一试验中测试多种设备的方法、残疾终点的效用加权以及适应性设计,以确定干预不再获益的时间和组织损伤阈值。

结论

急性缺血性中风的血管内研究重点是快速部署新型、高效的神经血栓切除术设备,对确认存在目标血管闭塞的患者进行临床试验。

相似文献

1
Stroke treatment academic industry roundtable: research priorities in the assessment of neurothrombectomy devices.
Stroke. 2013 Dec;44(12):3596-601. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002769. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
2
Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.
Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):e109-37. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000082721.62796.09. Epub 2003 Jul 17.
3
Stroke Treatment Academic Industry Roundtable: The Next Generation of Endovascular Trials.
Stroke. 2016 Oct;47(10):2656-65. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013578. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
7
Impact of Mechanical Thrombectomy on the Organization of the Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke.
Eur Neurol. 2016;75(1-2):41-7. doi: 10.1159/000443638. Epub 2016 Jan 16.
8
Endovascular Treatment with Stent-Retriever Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 25;11(1):e0147287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147287. eCollection 2016.
9
Extending reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke: emerging pharmacological, mechanical, and imaging strategies.
Stroke. 2005 Oct;36(10):2311-20. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000182100.65262.46. Epub 2005 Sep 22.
10
Management of acute ischemic stroke: current status of pharmacological and mechanical endovascular methods.
Neurol Res. 2009 Oct;31(8):807-15. doi: 10.1179/016164109X12445505689562.

引用本文的文献

1
Therapeutic potential of natural products in ischemic stroke: targeting angiogenesis.
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jun 18;16:1579172. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1579172. eCollection 2025.
2
Nucleic Acid Therapies for Ischemic Stroke.
Neurotherapeutics. 2019 Apr;16(2):299-313. doi: 10.1007/s13311-019-00710-x.
3
Regenerative Medicine Therapies for Targeting Neuroinflammation After Stroke.
Front Neurol. 2018 Sep 3;9:734. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00734. eCollection 2018.
4
Human iNPC therapy leads to improvement in functional neurologic outcomes in a pig ischemic stroke model.
Brain Behav. 2018 Apr 18;8(5):e00972. doi: 10.1002/brb3.972. eCollection 2018 May.
5
Inhibition of the NLRP3-inflammasome as a potential approach for neuroprotection after stroke.
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 13;8(1):5971. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24350-x.
6
The Esophageal Organoid System Reveals Functional Interplay Between Notch and Cytokines in Reactive Epithelial Changes.
Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jan 3;5(3):333-352. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.12.013. eCollection 2018 Mar.
7
Inclusion criteria update for the rat intraluminal ischaemic model for preclinical studies.
Dis Model Mech. 2017 Dec 19;10(12):1433-1438. doi: 10.1242/dmm.029868.
8
Extending the Time Window for Endovascular and Pharmacological Reperfusion.
Transl Stroke Res. 2016 Aug;7(4):284-93. doi: 10.1007/s12975-015-0444-4. Epub 2016 Jan 7.

本文引用的文献

2
Impact of onset-to-reperfusion time on stroke mortality: a collaborative pooled analysis.
Circulation. 2013 May 14;127(19):1980-5. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000311.
3
Reimbursement for thrombectomy devices in patients who are ineligible for intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator.
Stroke. 2013 May;44(5):1215-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001442. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
4
A trial of imaging selection and endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke.
N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 7;368(10):914-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1212793. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
5
Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke.
N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 7;368(10):893-903. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214300. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
6
Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke.
N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 7;368(10):904-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1213701. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
7
Some recommendations for multi-arm multi-stage trials.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Apr;25(2):716-27. doi: 10.1177/0962280212465498. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
8
Ultrashort imaging to reperfusion time interval arrests core expansion in endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2013 May;5 Suppl 1:i58-61. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010486. Epub 2012 Nov 3.
9
MRI profile and response to endovascular reperfusion after stroke (DEFUSE 2): a prospective cohort study.
Lancet Neurol. 2012 Oct;11(10):860-7. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70203-X. Epub 2012 Sep 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验