Suppr超能文献

血管内治疗与影像学选择对缺血性脑卒中的治疗试验

A trial of imaging selection and endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke.

机构信息

Department of Neurology and the Stroke Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 7;368(10):914-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1212793. Epub 2013 Feb 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whether brain imaging can identify patients who are most likely to benefit from therapies for acute ischemic stroke and whether endovascular thrombectomy improves clinical outcomes in such patients remains unclear.

METHODS

In this study, we randomly assigned patients within 8 hours after the onset of large-vessel, anterior-circulation strokes to undergo mechanical embolectomy (Merci Retriever or Penumbra System) or receive standard care. All patients underwent pretreatment computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Randomization was stratified according to whether the patient had a favorable penumbral pattern (substantial salvageable tissue and small infarct core) or a nonpenumbral pattern (large core or small or absent penumbra). We assessed outcomes using the 90-day modified Rankin scale, ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (dead).

RESULTS

Among 118 eligible patients, the mean age was 65.5 years, the mean time to enrollment was 5.5 hours, and 58% had a favorable penumbral pattern. Revascularization in the embolectomy group was achieved in 67% of the patients. Ninety-day mortality was 21%, and the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 4%; neither rate differed across groups. Among all patients, mean scores on the modified Rankin scale did not differ between embolectomy and standard care (3.9 vs. 3.9, P=0.99). Embolectomy was not superior to standard care in patients with either a favorable penumbral pattern (mean score, 3.9 vs. 3.4; P=0.23) or a nonpenumbral pattern (mean score, 4.0 vs. 4.4; P=0.32). In the primary analysis of scores on the 90-day modified Rankin scale, there was no interaction between the pretreatment imaging pattern and treatment assignment (P=0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

A favorable penumbral pattern on neuroimaging did not identify patients who would differentially benefit from endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke, nor was embolectomy shown to be superior to standard care. (Funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; MR RESCUE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00389467.).

摘要

背景

脑部成像是否能够识别出最有可能从急性缺血性脑卒中治疗中获益的患者,以及血管内血栓切除术是否能改善此类患者的临床转归,目前仍不清楚。

方法

在这项研究中,我们将发病 8 小时内的大血管前循环脑卒中患者随机分为机械取栓组(Merci 取栓器或 Penumbra 系统)或接受标准治疗。所有患者均接受脑 CT 或 MRI 平扫。根据患者是否存在可挽救组织较多且梗死核心较小的缺血半暗带(有利半暗带)或梗死核心较大或半暗带较小或不存在(无利半暗带),进行分层随机分组。采用 90 天改良 Rankin 量表评估结局,0 分为无症状,6 分为死亡。

结果

在 118 例符合条件的患者中,平均年龄为 65.5 岁,平均入组时间为 5.5 小时,58%存在有利半暗带。取栓组有 67%的患者实现血管再通。90 天死亡率为 21%,症状性颅内出血发生率为 4%;两组间无差异。所有患者中,改良 Rankin 量表评分在取栓组与标准治疗组间无差异(3.9 分比 3.9 分,P=0.99)。在有利半暗带(平均评分 3.9 分比 3.4 分,P=0.23)或无利半暗带(平均评分 4.0 分比 4.4 分,P=0.32)患者中,取栓治疗均不比标准治疗更优。在主要的 90 天改良 Rankin 量表评分分析中,影像学预处理模式与治疗分组之间无交互作用(P=0.14)。

结论

神经影像学上有利半暗带模式不能识别出可能从急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗中获益不同的患者,也不能证明取栓治疗优于标准治疗。(由美国国立神经病学与卒中研究所资助;MR RESCUE 临床试验.gov 编号,NCT00389467。)

相似文献

6
Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection.血管内治疗缺血性卒中的灌注成像选择。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 12;372(11):1009-18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414792. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
7
Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke.随机评估缺血性脑卒中的血管内治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 12;372(11):1019-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414905. Epub 2015 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

4
Current perspectives on endovascular therapy for large core ischemic stroke.大型核心缺血性卒中血管内治疗的当前观点
Neurotherapeutics. 2025 Jul;22(4):e00622. doi: 10.1016/j.neurot.2025.e00622. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
6
[Acute ischemic stroke treatment].[急性缺血性卒中治疗]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2025 Mar;120(2):120-128. doi: 10.1007/s00063-024-01233-w. Epub 2025 Jan 9.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验