Suppr超能文献

GemStar®泵和AmbIT®泵用于患者自控硬膜外镇痛的临床评估

A Clinical Evaluation of the GemStar® and the AmbIT® Pumps for Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia.

作者信息

Sinha Aneeta, Paech Michael, Ledger Rupert, McDonnell Nolan, Nathan Elizabeth

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK.

出版信息

Anesth Pain Med. 2012 Fall;2(2):66-71. doi: 10.5812/aapm.7513. Epub 2012 Sep 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-controlled analgesia is used for both labor and postoperative analgesia.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess user satisfaction and functionality of two ambulatory, electronic patient controlled analgesia devices, the GemStar pump Hospira Inc., Illinois, USA) and the ambIT Ambulatory Infusion Therapy pump (Sorenson Medical Products, Utah, USA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

It was a randomized clinical trial of laboring women and postoperative gynecology patients receiving patient-controlled epidural analgesia. Patients were randomized to use one of the pumps and both anesthesiologists and patients completed questionnaires about aspects of pump function, and rated their satisfaction with the equipment. Midwives and high-dependency unit nurses also evaluated the pumps in each clinical setting.

RESULTS

Forty patients, 20 laboring women and 20 postoperative patients were randomized and completed the study. The pumps were compared by nine anesthesiologists. Patient and staff satisfaction with both devices was high. Patient satisfaction did not significantly differ between groups (median 10 [8, 10] for the GemStar and 10 [9, 10] for the ambIT, P = 0.525]. The median staff satisfaction score was 8 [6, 8] for the GemStar and 7 [5, 8] for the ambIT (P = 0.154). Both patient cohorts rated each pump highly for most aspects of clinical function. Staff rated the ambIT pump more favourably with respect to portability and storage at the bedside whilst the GemStar had better assessments with respect to its consumables and interactions involving the electronic interface.

CONCLUSIONS

Both devices were well-rated by patients and staff, with no significant difference between them for overall satisfaction, and only minor differences with respect to their respective strengths and weaknesses.

摘要

背景

患者自控镇痛用于分娩和术后镇痛。

目的

本研究旨在评估两种门诊电子患者自控镇痛设备的用户满意度和功能,即GemStar泵(美国伊利诺伊州Hospira公司)和ambIT门诊输液治疗泵(美国犹他州Sorenson医疗产品公司)。

患者与方法

这是一项针对接受患者自控硬膜外镇痛的分娩妇女和术后妇科患者的随机临床试验。患者被随机分配使用其中一种泵,麻醉医生和患者均完成关于泵功能方面的问卷,并对设备满意度进行评分。助产士和高依赖病房护士也在每个临床环境中对泵进行评估。

结果

40例患者(20例分娩妇女和20例术后患者)被随机分组并完成研究。9名麻醉医生对这两种泵进行了比较。患者和工作人员对两种设备的满意度都很高。两组之间患者满意度无显著差异(GemStar泵的中位数为10[8,10],ambIT泵的中位数为10[9,10],P = 0.525)。GemStar泵的工作人员满意度中位数为8[6,8],ambIT泵为7[5,8](P = 0.154)。两个患者队列对每种泵的大多数临床功能方面评价都很高。工作人员对ambIT泵在便携性和床边存储方面评价更高,而GemStar泵在耗材和涉及电子界面的交互方面评价更好。

结论

两种设备在患者和工作人员中评分都很高,总体满意度无显著差异,在各自的优缺点方面只有微小差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9577/3821112/8bdd5f35b68e/aapm-02-66-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验