Wise E A
Center for Health Sciences, Psychiatry Department, Mental Health Resources and University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee.
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 1994 Jun;1(2):167-81. doi: 10.1007/BF01999745.
The MBHI and MMPI personality disorder scales were analyzed for convergent and discriminant validity. Correlational data demonstrated that six of the eight scales were significantly related, while the remaining two scales approached significance. Further analyses of these data, however, demonstrated that none of the scales correlated significantly better with its convergent scale compared to nonconvergent scales. The MBHI classified significantly more of the sample as personality disordered (93%) compared to the MMPI personality disorder scales (17%). Furthermore, the MBHI tended to describe the sample as falling within the Anxious cluster of personality disorders, whereas the MMPI described them within the Dramatic cluster. Single scale codetype correspondence was found to be 15%, while two-point concordance was 12.5%, indicating very low congruence between personality style codetypes. These two measures do not appear to be measuring the same personality style constructs.
对MBHI和MMPI人格障碍量表进行了收敛效度和区分效度分析。相关数据表明,八个量表中的六个显著相关,而其余两个量表接近显著相关。然而,对这些数据的进一步分析表明,与非收敛量表相比,没有一个量表与其收敛量表的相关性显著更好。与MMPI人格障碍量表(17%)相比,MBHI将更多的样本显著分类为患有 人格障碍(93%)。此外,MBHI倾向于将样本描述为属于焦虑型人格障碍类别,而MMPI则将他们描述为戏剧型人格障碍类别。发现单量表编码类型对应率为15%,两点一致性为12.5%,表明人格风格编码类型之间的一致性非常低。这两种测量方法似乎并没有测量相同的人格风格结构。