• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MMPI scales for DSM-III personality disorders: their derivation and correlates.

作者信息

Morey L C, Waugh M H, Blashfield R K

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1985 Jun;49(3):245-51. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4903_5.

DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa4903_5
PMID:4032202
Abstract

Scales tapping the dimensions of personality disorder as represented in the DSM-III were derived using a combined rational/empirical strategy. The final version of the scales demonstrated both content validity as well as internal consistency. Correlations between the derived scales and between these scales and the original MMPI clinical scales were generally found to be in the expected direction providing preliminary evidence of criterion related validity. It is suggested that the derived scales may represent an advance toward the reliable assessment of DSM-III personality constructs.

摘要

相似文献

1
MMPI scales for DSM-III personality disorders: their derivation and correlates.
J Pers Assess. 1985 Jun;49(3):245-51. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4903_5.
2
Convergent validity of alternative MMPI-2 personality disorder scales.明尼苏达多相人格调查表-2(MMPI-2)替代人格障碍量表的聚合效度。
J Pers Assess. 2000 Dec;75(3):502-18. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7503_10.
3
Incremental validity of the MMPI-2 Content Scales in the assessment of personality and psychopathology by self-report.明尼苏达多相人格调查表第二版(MMPI-2)内容量表在通过自我报告评估人格和精神病理学方面的增量效度。
J Pers Assess. 1993 Dec;61(3):557-75. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6103_12.
4
A comparison of the MCMI-III personality disorder and modifier indices with the MMPI-2 clinical and validity scales.MCMI-III人格障碍及修正指数与MMPI-2临床量表和效度量表的比较。
J Pers Assess. 2004 Jun;82(3):273-80. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8203_03.
5
Comparative validity of MMPI-2 and MCMI-II personality disorder classifications.明尼苏达多项人格调查表-2(MMPI-2)与米隆临床多轴问卷-Ⅱ(MCMI-Ⅱ)人格障碍分类的比较效度
J Pers Assess. 1996 Jun;66(3):569-82. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6603_7.
6
An examination of three sets of MMPI-2 personality disorder scales.对三套明尼苏达多项人格调查表第二版(MMPI-2)人格障碍量表的检验。
J Pers Disord. 2005 Aug;19(4):370-85. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2005.19.4.370.
7
MMPI characteristics of the DSM-III borderline personality disorder.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版边缘型人格障碍的明尼苏达多相人格测验特征
J Pers Assess. 1983 Feb;47(1):50-9. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4701_6.
8
Estimation of MCMI DSM-III axis II constructs from MMPI scales and subscales.从明尼苏达多项人格调查表(MMPI)量表及分量表估计米隆临床多轴问卷(MCMI)DSM-III轴II结构。
J Pers Assess. 1990 Fall;55(1-2):195-201. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674058.
9
Incremental validity of the MMPI-2 PSY-5 scales in assessing self-reported personality disorder criteria.明尼苏达多相人格调查表第二版(MMPI-2)的人格五因素量表(PSY-5)在评估自我报告的人格障碍标准方面的增量效度。
Assessment. 2006 Jun;13(2):178-86. doi: 10.1177/1073191106286987.
10
Convergent validity of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2: preliminary findings with a normative sample.《中国人格评定量表》与《明尼苏达多相人格调查表-2》的收敛效度:来自常模样本的初步研究结果
J Pers Assess. 2004 Feb;82(1):92-103. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8201_14.

引用本文的文献

1
The validity, reliability and clinical utility of the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) according to DSM-5 revision criteria.根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版修订标准,人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)的有效性、可靠性和临床实用性。
World Psychiatry. 2025 Oct;24(3):319-340. doi: 10.1002/wps.21339.
2
Do trajectories of self- and interpersonal functioning identify a core underlying developmental pathway for personality pathology in late adolescence and early adulthood?自我与人际功能的轨迹能否识别出青少年晚期和成年早期人格病理学潜在的核心发展路径?
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1037/abn0001044.
3
Borderline Personality Disorder "Discouraged Type": A Case Report.
边缘型人格障碍“沮丧型”:一例报告。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jan 21;58(2):162. doi: 10.3390/medicina58020162.
4
Validation of the German Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory and Construction of a Brief Form Using Ant Colony Optimization.采用蚁群优化算法验证德国五因素自恋量表及其简式的构建
Assessment. 2023 Jun;30(4):969-997. doi: 10.1177/10731911221075761. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
5
Criterion A of the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders in MMPI-2/RF Personality Disorder Scales.《明尼苏达多相人格调查表第二版/修订版(MMPI-2/RF)人格障碍量表中人格障碍的DSM-5替代模型的A标准》
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 26;12:735848. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.735848. eCollection 2021.
6
Assessment of fluctuation between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: Development and initial validation of the FLUX scales.浮夸型和脆弱型自恋波动评估:FLUX 量表的编制与初步验证。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Dec;30(12):1612-1624. doi: 10.1037/pas0000616. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
7
Personality disorder correspondence between the million behavioral health inventory (MBHI) and the minnesota multiphasic personality inventory (MMPI).百万行为健康量表(MBHI)与明尼苏达多相人格量表(MMPI)之间的人格障碍对应关系。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 1994 Jun;1(2):167-81. doi: 10.1007/BF01999745.
8
A comparison of obsessive-compulsive personality disorder scales.强迫人格障碍量表的比较。
J Pers Assess. 2010 May;92(3):232-40. doi: 10.1080/00223891003670182.
9
Diagnosis and treatment of personality disorders.
Psychiatr Q. 1992 Winter;63(4):413-24. doi: 10.1007/BF01066766.