• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

男孩注意缺陷多动障碍 Stroop 干扰错误评分的特异性。

The specificity of the Stroop interference score of errors to ADHD in boys.

机构信息

a Department of Biological and Medical Psychology , University of Bergen , Bergen , Norway.

出版信息

Child Neuropsychol. 2014;20(6):677-91. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2013.855716. Epub 2013 Nov 14.

DOI:10.1080/09297049.2013.855716
PMID:24228780
Abstract

The Stroop Interference Test is widely used to assess the inhibition function; however, divergent results have emerged from meta-analyses in children with ADHD. This has led to conflicting results as to whether the Stroop test detects the level of inhibition in these children. We hypothesized that the general approach to include interference scores depending on response time causes conflicting results, whereas recordings of errors may prove a superior measure of the inhibition function in children with ADHD. In the present study, 39 children with an ADHD diagnosis, two subgroups with and without another comorbid mental health disorder, were compared with respect to their interference scores of response time and errors with two subgroups of children with no ADHD. The two subgroups comprised 33 children with another mental health disorder other than ADHD and 56 children with no psychiatric disorder. The between-group analyses detected a multivariate, marginal main effect of an ADHD diagnosis on the Stroop interference scores, and a univariate main effect of an ADHD diagnosis on the interference score of errors. Further, only the interference score of errors predicted significantly the parent reported scores on the Inhibit scale from the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function. These findings support that a Stroop interference score of errors is sensitive for inhibition problems in children with ADHD and encourages the use of Stroop versions including error recordings independent of response time.

摘要

斯特鲁普干扰测验被广泛用于评估抑制功能;然而,在 ADHD 儿童的荟萃分析中出现了不同的结果。这导致了关于斯特鲁普测试是否能检测出这些儿童抑制水平的争议。我们假设,根据反应时间纳入干扰分数的一般方法导致了相互矛盾的结果,而记录错误可能是 ADHD 儿童抑制功能的更好衡量标准。在本研究中,将 39 名 ADHD 诊断的儿童与具有和不具有另一种共患精神健康障碍的两个亚组进行比较,同时将他们的反应时和错误的干扰分数与两个亚组的无 ADHD 儿童进行比较。这两个亚组包括 33 名患有 ADHD 以外的另一种精神健康障碍的儿童和 56 名没有精神障碍的儿童。组间分析检测到,ADHD 诊断对斯特鲁普干扰分数有一个多变量的、边缘的主要影响,ADHD 诊断对错误的干扰分数有一个单变量的主要影响。此外,只有错误的干扰分数显著预测了来自行为评定量表的父母报告的抑制量表分数。这些发现支持了错误的斯特鲁普干扰分数在 ADHD 儿童的抑制问题上是敏感的,并鼓励使用包括独立于反应时间的错误记录的斯特鲁普版本。

相似文献

1
The specificity of the Stroop interference score of errors to ADHD in boys.男孩注意缺陷多动障碍 Stroop 干扰错误评分的特异性。
Child Neuropsychol. 2014;20(6):677-91. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2013.855716. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
2
An asymmetric stroop/reverse-stroop interference phenomenon in ADHD.ADHD 中的非对称 Stroop/逆向 Stroop 干扰现象。
J Atten Disord. 2011 Aug;15(6):499-505. doi: 10.1177/1087054710367607. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
3
Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents who have a diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍的儿童和青少年的健康相关生活质量。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e541-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0844.
4
Stroop/reverse-Stroop interference in typical development and its relation to symptoms of ADHD.典型发育过程中的斯特鲁普/反向斯特鲁普干扰及其与 ADHD 症状的关系。
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Aug;34(8):2391-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.04.019. Epub 2013 May 25.
5
Beyond interference control impairment in ADHD: evidence from increased intraindividual variability in the color-stroop test.注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)患者存在干扰控制障碍以外的问题:来自色词斯特测验中个体内变异性增加的证据。
Child Neuropsychol. 2013 Sep;19(5):495-515. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2012.696603. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
6
ADHD and Stroop interference from age 9 to age 41 years: a meta-analysis of developmental effects.注意缺陷多动障碍与9至41岁的斯特鲁普干扰效应:发育影响的荟萃分析
Psychol Med. 2008 Nov;38(11):1607-16. doi: 10.1017/S003329170700267X. Epub 2008 Jan 29.
7
Stroop interference and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a review and meta-analysis.斯特鲁普干扰与注意力缺陷多动障碍:一项综述与荟萃分析
Neuropsychology. 2007 Mar;21(2):251-62. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.21.2.251.
8
Nonword reading and Stroop interference: what differentiates attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and reading disability?非词阅读和斯特鲁普干扰:注意力缺陷/多动障碍和阅读障碍有何不同?
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2014;36(3):244-60. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2013.878690. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
9
Neurobehavioral and hemodynamic evaluation of Stroop and reverse Stroop interference in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.注意缺陷多动障碍儿童中Stroop和反向Stroop干扰的神经行为学及血流动力学评估
Brain Dev. 2014 Feb;36(2):97-106. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
10
Interference effects in a numerical Stroop paradigm in 9- to 12-year-old children with ADHD-C.注意缺陷多动障碍合并多动型(ADHD-C)9至12岁儿童数字斯特鲁普范式中的干扰效应。
Child Neuropsychol. 2006 Jun;12(3):223-43. doi: 10.1080/09297040500477483.

引用本文的文献

1
The association between reaction time variability and social problems in children with ADHD: support for the role of attentional fluctuations in social interactions.注意缺陷多动障碍儿童反应时变异性与社会问题之间的关联:支持注意力波动在社会互动中的作用。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 16. doi: 10.1007/s00787-025-02787-6.
2
A Lifespan Model of Interference Resolution and Inhibitory Control: Risk for Depression and Changes with Illness Progression.干扰解决和抑制控制的寿命模型:抑郁风险及与疾病进展的变化。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2020 Dec;30(4):477-498. doi: 10.1007/s11065-019-09424-5. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
3
Evaluation of the diagnostic implications of Das-Naglieri cognitive assessment system in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
评价达思-纳格利尔认知评估系统在注意缺陷多动障碍儿童中的诊断意义。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Dec 12;18(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1970-x.
4
The Lateral Prefrontal Cortex and Selection/Inhibition in ADHD.外侧前额叶皮质与注意缺陷多动障碍中的选择/抑制
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Feb 20;12:65. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00065. eCollection 2018.