Suppr超能文献

实验室诊断莱姆神经Borreliosis:三种脑脊液抗Borrelia 抗体检测方法的比较。

Laboratory diagnosis of Lyme neuroborreliosis: a comparison of three CSF anti-Borrelia antibody assays.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Microbiology, Ryhov County Hospital, 551 85, Jönköping, Sweden,

出版信息

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 May;33(5):797-803. doi: 10.1007/s10096-013-2014-6. Epub 2013 Nov 22.

Abstract

The diagnosis of Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB) requires the detection of intrathecal synthesis of Borrelia-specific antibodies, but in very early disease, the sensitivity may be low. We compared the performance of the second-generation IDEIA Lyme Neuroborreliosis test (Oxoid), based on purified native flagellum antigen, with two newly developed tests based on several recombinant antigens for the diagnosis of LNB. Patients investigated for LNB during 2003 through 2007 were included (n = 175); 52 with definite LNB, four with possible LNB and 119 non-LNB patients. Serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were analysed with the IDEIA Lyme Neuroborreliosis (Oxoid), VIDAS Lyme IgG (bioMérieux) and recomBead Borrelia IgM and IgG (Mikrogen) assays. Intrathecal antibody indices (AIs) were calculated according to the manufacturers' protocols. The IDEIA test performed with an overall sensitivity (IgM and IgG AIs taken together) of 88 % and a specificity of 99 %. The VIDAS test showed a sensitivity of 86 % and a specificity of 97 %. An overall sensitivity of 100 % and a specificity of 97 % were achieved by the recomBead test. We conclude that the three assays performed equally well regarding specificity, but our data suggest an improved diagnostic sensitivity with the recomBead Borrelia test.

摘要

莱姆神经Borreliosis(LNB)的诊断需要检测Borrelia 特异性抗体的鞘内合成,但在疾病早期,敏感性可能较低。我们比较了第二代 IDEIA Lyme 神经Borreliosis 测试(Oxoid),该测试基于纯化的天然鞭毛抗原,与两种新开发的基于几种重组抗原的测试,用于诊断 LNB。2003 年至 2007 年期间调查的 LNB 患者包括在内(n = 175); 52 例确诊 LNB,4 例可能 LNB 和 119 例非 LNB 患者。血清和脑脊液(CSF)采用 IDEIA Lyme Neuroborreliosis(Oxoid)、VIDAS Lyme IgG(bioMérieux)和 recomBead Borrelia IgM 和 IgG(Mikrogen)检测分析。根据制造商的方案计算鞘内抗体指数(AI)。IDEIA 试验的总敏感性(IgM 和 IgG AI 一起)为 88%,特异性为 99%。VIDAS 试验的敏感性为 86%,特异性为 97%。recomBead 试验的总敏感性为 100%,特异性为 97%。我们得出结论,三种检测方法在特异性方面表现相当,但我们的数据表明,recomBead Borrelia 检测具有更好的诊断敏感性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5568/3996281/5ba2ed72430f/10096_2013_2014_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验