Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland. Department of Neurology and
Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014 Jun;69(6):687-94. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glt181. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
The age-specific prevalence and incidence of dementia and cognitive impairment in the United States have either remained stable or even slightly declined during the 1980s-1990s. A suggested but untested reason for this improvement in cognitive function over time is higher educational attainment among more recent cohorts.
We used data from two large prospective population-based epidemiological dementia studies conducted in two adjacent regions during the period 1987-2012. We examined whether (i) cohort effects could be observed in age-associated trajectories of cognitive functions and (ii) the observed cohort effects could be explained by educational attainment. Trajectories of neuropsychological tests tapping three domains (psychomotor speed, executive function, and language) were compared among cohorts born between 1902 and 1911, 1912 and 1921, 1922 and 1931, and 1932 and 1943. We examined Age × Cohort interactions in mixed-effects models with/without controlling for education effects.
Cohort effects in age-associated trajectories were observed in all three domains, with consistent differences between the earliest born cohort and the most recent cohort. Executive functions showed the strongest and persistent differences between the most recent and other three cohorts. Education did not attenuate any of these associations.
Cohort effects were observed in all examined cognitive domains and, surprisingly, remained significant after controlling for educational effects. Factors other than education are likely responsible for the cohort effects in cognitive decline.
在 20 世纪 80 年代至 90 年代期间,美国特定年龄段的痴呆症和认知障碍的患病率和发病率保持稳定甚至略有下降。认知功能随时间改善的一个被提出但未经证实的原因是最近几代人的受教育程度更高。
我们使用了两项在相邻地区进行的、针对两个大型前瞻性人群的基于人群的流行病学痴呆研究的数据。我们研究了(i)是否可以在认知功能的年龄相关轨迹中观察到队列效应,以及(ii)观察到的队列效应是否可以通过受教育程度来解释。通过比较出生于 1902 年至 1911 年、1912 年至 1921 年、1922 年至 1931 年和 1932 年至 1943 年的队列之间三个领域(心理运动速度、执行功能和语言)的神经心理学测试轨迹,来检验队列效应。我们在混合效应模型中检查了 Age×Cohort 交互作用,包括/不包括教育效果的控制。
在所有三个领域都观察到了与年龄相关的轨迹中的队列效应,最早出生的队列与最近出生的队列之间存在一致的差异。执行功能在最近出生的队列与其他三个队列之间显示出最强和持续的差异。教育并没有减弱这些关联中的任何一个。
在所有检查的认知领域都观察到了队列效应,而且令人惊讶的是,在控制了教育效果后,这些效应仍然显著。除了教育之外,其他因素可能是认知能力下降的队列效应的原因。