Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.
BMJ. 2012 Aug 21;345:e5452. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5452.
To assess the contribution of modifiable risk factors to social inequalities in the incidence of type 2 diabetes when these factors are measured at study baseline or repeatedly over follow-up and when long term exposure is accounted for.
Prospective cohort study with risk factors (health behaviours (smoking, alcohol consumption, diet, and physical activity), body mass index, and biological risk markers (systolic blood pressure, triglycerides and high density lipoprotein cholesterol)) measured four times and diabetes status assessed seven times between 1991-93 and 2007-09.
Civil service departments in London (Whitehall II study).
7237 adults without diabetes (mean age 49.4 years; 2196 women).
Incidence of type 2 diabetes and contribution of risk factors to its association with socioeconomic status.
Over a mean follow-up of 14.2 years, 818 incident cases of diabetes were identified. Participants in the lowest occupational category had a 1.86-fold (hazard ratio 1.86, 95% confidence interval 1.48 to 2.32) greater risk of developing diabetes relative to those in the highest occupational category. Health behaviours and body mass index explained 33% (-1% to 78%) of this socioeconomic differential when risk factors were assessed at study baseline (attenuation of hazard ratio from 1.86 to 1.51), 36% (22% to 66%) when they were assessed repeatedly over the follow-up (attenuated hazard ratio 1.48), and 45% (28% to 75%) when long term exposure over the follow-up was accounted for (attenuated hazard ratio 1.41). With additional adjustment for biological risk markers, a total of 53% (29% to 88%) of the socioeconomic differential was explained (attenuated hazard ratio 1.35, 1.05 to 1.72).
Modifiable risk factors such as health behaviours and obesity, when measured repeatedly over time, explain almost half of the social inequalities in incidence of type 2 diabetes. This is more than was seen in previous studies based on single measurement of risk factors.
评估可改变的风险因素对 2 型糖尿病发病率的社会不平等的贡献,这些因素是在研究基线时测量的,还是在随访期间重复测量的,以及在考虑长期暴露时的情况。
一项前瞻性队列研究,对健康行为(吸烟、饮酒、饮食和体力活动)、体重指数和生物学风险标志物(收缩压、甘油三酯和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇)进行了四次测量,并在 1991-93 年至 2007-09 年期间进行了七次糖尿病状态评估。
伦敦公务员部门(Whitehall II 研究)。
7237 名无糖尿病的成年人(平均年龄 49.4 岁;2196 名女性)。
2 型糖尿病的发病率以及风险因素对其与社会经济地位关系的贡献。
在平均 14.2 年的随访期间,共发现 818 例糖尿病新发病例。与最高职业类别相比,最低职业类别的参与者患糖尿病的风险高 1.86 倍(风险比 1.86,95%置信区间 1.48 至 2.32)。当基线时评估风险因素时,健康行为和体重指数解释了这种社会经济差异的 33%(-1%至 78%)(危险比从 1.86 降低至 1.51);当在随访期间反复评估时,解释了 36%(22%至 66%)(衰减的危险比为 1.48);当考虑随访期间的长期暴露时,解释了 45%(28%至 75%)(衰减的危险比为 1.41)。在对生物学风险标志物进行额外调整后,共解释了社会经济差异的 53%(29%至 88%)(衰减的危险比为 1.35,1.05 至 1.72)。
可改变的风险因素,如健康行为和肥胖,当在一段时间内反复测量时,可解释近一半的 2 型糖尿病发病率的社会不平等。这比以前基于风险因素单次测量的研究更多。