Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN;
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Apr;16(4):454-60. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt184. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
To empirically determine the socioeconomic differences in risk profiles of susceptibility and ever use of tobacco among adolescents in India and to investigate the association between the risk profiles and the psychosocial factors for tobacco use.
Students in 16 private (higher socioeconomic status [SES]; n = 4,489) and 16 government (lower SES; n = 7,153) schools in two large cities in India were surveyed about their tobacco use and related psychosocial factors in 2004. Latent class analysis was used to identify homogenous, mutually exclusive typologies existing within the data.
Overall, 3 and 4 latent classes of susceptibility and ever use of tobacco best described students in higher- and lower- SES schools, respectively. Profiles with various combinations of susceptibility and ever use of tobacco were differentially related to psychosocial factors, with lower- SES students being more vulnerable to increased levels of tobacco use than higher- SES students.
Acknowledging the multiple dimensions of tobacco use behaviors and identifying constellations of risk behaviors will enable more accurate understanding of etiological processes and will provide information for refining and targeting preventive interventions. Additionally, identifying the socioeconomic differences in susceptibility and ever use risk profiles and their psychosocial correlates will enable policy makers to address these inequities through improved allocation of resources.
在印度,实证确定青少年在对烟草的易感性和使用方面的社会经济差异风险特征,并研究这些风险特征与烟草使用的社会心理因素之间的关联。
2004 年,在印度两个大城市的 16 所私立(高社会经济地位[SES];n=4489)和 16 所公立(低 SES;n=7153)学校中,对学生进行了关于其烟草使用情况和相关社会心理因素的调查。采用潜在类别分析来识别数据中存在的同质、互斥的类型。
总体而言,高 SES 和低 SES 学校的学生分别有 3 个和 4 个潜在的烟草易感性和使用类别。具有各种烟草易感性和使用组合的特征与社会心理因素存在差异关联,与高 SES 学生相比,低 SES 学生更容易增加烟草使用量。
承认烟草使用行为的多个维度,并确定风险行为的组合,将使人们能够更准确地理解病因学过程,并为改进和确定预防干预措施提供信息。此外,确定易感性和使用风险特征的社会经济差异及其与社会心理因素的关联,将使政策制定者能够通过更好地分配资源来解决这些不平等问题。