Kraemer Felicitas
Philosophy & Ethics, Eindhoven University of Technology, IPO 1.01, PO Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Neuroethics. 2013;6(3):483-497. doi: 10.1007/s12152-011-9115-7. Epub 2011 May 12.
In this article, I explore select case studies of Parkinson patients treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS) in light of the notions of alienation and authenticity. While the literature on DBS has so far neglected the issues of authenticity and alienation, I argue that interpreting these cases in terms of these concepts raises new issues for not only the philosophical discussion of neuro-ethics of DBS, but also for the psychological and medical approach to patients under DBS. In particular, I suggest that the experience of alienation and authenticity varies from patient to patient with DBS. For some, alienation can be brought about by neurointerventions because patients no longer feel like themselves. But, on the other hand, it seems alienation can also be cured by DBS as other patients experience their state of mind as authentic under treatment and retrospectively regard their former lives without stimulation as alienated. I argue that we must do further research on the relevance of authenticity and alienation to patients treated with DBS in order to gain a deeper philosophical understanding, and to develop the best evaluative criterion for the behavior of DBS patients.
在本文中,我根据异化和本真性的概念,探讨了接受脑深部电刺激(DBS)治疗的帕金森病患者的一些精选案例研究。虽然迄今为止关于DBS的文献忽略了本真性和异化问题,但我认为,从这些概念的角度解读这些案例,不仅为DBS神经伦理学的哲学讨论,也为接受DBS治疗的患者的心理学和医学治疗方法提出了新问题。特别是,我认为接受DBS治疗的患者的异化和本真性体验因人而异。对一些人来说,神经干预可能会导致异化,因为患者不再感觉自己像自己了。但另一方面,DBS似乎也可以治愈异化,因为其他患者在治疗过程中体验到自己的心理状态是真实的,并回顾性地认为自己以前没有刺激的生活是异化的。我认为,我们必须进一步研究本真性和异化与接受DBS治疗的患者的相关性,以便获得更深入的哲学理解,并为DBS患者的行为制定最佳评估标准。