• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Me, Myself and My Brain Implant: Deep Brain Stimulation Raises Questions of Personal Authenticity and Alienation.我、我自己与我的脑植入物:深度脑刺激引发了关于个人真实性与疏离感的问题。
Neuroethics. 2013;6(3):483-497. doi: 10.1007/s12152-011-9115-7. Epub 2011 May 12.
2
Authenticity or autonomy? When deep brain stimulation causes a dilemma.真实性还是自主性?当深部脑刺激引发两难困境时。
J Med Ethics. 2013 Dec;39(12):757-60. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100427. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
3
Personal recovery associated with deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: A constructivist grounded theory study.个人康复与深部脑刺激治疗难治性抑郁症相关:建构主义扎根理论研究。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2023 Oct;30(5):1005-1018. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12923. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
4
Did My Brain Implant Make Me Do It? Questions Raised by DBS Regarding Psychological Continuity, Responsibility for Action and Mental Competence.是我的脑植入物让我这么做的吗?脑深部电刺激引发的关于心理连续性、行为责任和心理能力的问题。
Neuroethics. 2013;6(3):527-539. doi: 10.1007/s12152-010-9093-1. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
5
Authenticity and autonomy in deep-brain stimulation.深部脑刺激中的真实性与自主性
J Med Ethics. 2014 Aug;40(8):563-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101419. Epub 2013 May 22.
6
The Ethics of Deep Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Anorexia Nervosa.用于治疗神经性厌食症的脑深部电刺激的伦理问题
Neuroethics. 2015;8(3):215-230. doi: 10.1007/s12152-015-9240-9. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
7
Towards authentic conversations. Authenticity in the patient-professional relationship.走向真实的对话。医患关系中的真实性。
Theor Med. 1994;15(3):227-42. doi: 10.1007/BF01313339.
8
Deep Brain Stimulation, Authenticity and Value.深部脑刺激、真实性与价值。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2017 Oct;26(4):640-657. doi: 10.1017/S0963180117000147.
9
Clarifying the Normative Significance of 'Personality Changes' Following Deep Brain Stimulation.澄清深部脑刺激后“人格改变”的规范意义。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Jun;26(3):1655-1680. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00207-3. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
10
Pragmatism and the Importance of Interdisciplinary Teams in Investigating Personality Changes following DBS.实用主义与跨学科团队在研究脑深部电刺激术后人格变化中的重要性。
Neuroethics. 2019;2019(Suppl 1):95-105. doi: 10.1007/s12152-019-09418-3. Epub 2019 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Is the Treatment Worse than the Disease?: Key Stakeholders' Views about the Use of Psychiatric Electroceutical Interventions for Treatment-Resistant Depression.治疗是否比疾病本身更糟糕?:关键利益相关者对使用精神科电治疗干预措施治疗难治性抑郁症的看法。
Neuroethics. 2025;18(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s12152-024-09573-2. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
2
Neuromodulation and memory: exploring ethical ramifications in memory modification treatment via implantable neurotechnologies.神经调节与记忆:探讨通过植入式神经技术进行记忆修改治疗中的伦理问题。
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 21;14:1282634. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1282634. eCollection 2023.
3
A comparative review on neuroethical issues in neuroscientific and neuroethical journals.神经科学与神经伦理学期刊中神经伦理问题的比较综述。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Sep 14;17:1160611. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1160611. eCollection 2023.
4
The ethics of AI-assisted warfighter enhancement research and experimentation: Historical perspectives and ethical challenges.人工智能辅助的战士增强研究与实验的伦理:历史视角与伦理挑战。
Front Big Data. 2022 Sep 9;5:978734. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2022.978734. eCollection 2022.
5
Asking questions that matter - Question prompt lists as tools for improving the consent process for neurotechnology clinical trials.提出重要问题——作为改善神经技术临床试验知情同意程序工具的问题提示清单。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jul 29;16:983226. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.983226. eCollection 2022.
6
Jumping through the hoops: Barriers and other ethical concerns regarding the use of psychiatric electroceutical interventions.跳圈游戏:关于使用精神科电疗干预的障碍和其他伦理问题。
Psychiatry Res. 2022 Jul;313:114612. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114612. Epub 2022 May 11.
7
Researcher Views on Changes in Personality, Mood, and Behavior in Next-Generation Deep Brain Stimulation.研究人员对下一代深部脑刺激中人格、情绪和行为变化的看法。
AJOB Neurosci. 2023 Jul-Sep;14(3):287-299. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2022.2048724. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
8
Memory Modification and Authenticity: A Narrative Approach.记忆修改与真实性:一种叙事方法。
Neuroethics. 2022;15(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s12152-022-09489-9. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
9
Losing Meaning: Philosophical Reflections on Neural Interventions and their Influence on Narrative Identity.失去意义:关于神经干预及其对叙事身份影响的哲学思考
Neuroethics. 2021;14(3):491-505. doi: 10.1007/s12152-021-09469-5. Epub 2021 May 15.
10
Evidence-Based Neuroethics, Deep Brain Stimulation and Personality - Deflating, but not Bursting, the Bubble.循证神经伦理学、深部脑刺激与人格——戳破泡沫,但并非将其完全戳破。
Neuroethics. 2021;14(Suppl 1):27-38. doi: 10.1007/s12152-018-9392-5. Epub 2018 Dec 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Did My Brain Implant Make Me Do It? Questions Raised by DBS Regarding Psychological Continuity, Responsibility for Action and Mental Competence.是我的脑植入物让我这么做的吗?脑深部电刺激引发的关于心理连续性、行为责任和心理能力的问题。
Neuroethics. 2013;6(3):527-539. doi: 10.1007/s12152-010-9093-1. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
2
Deep Brain Stimulation and the Search for Identity.深部脑刺激与身份探寻
Neuroethics. 2013;6(3):499-511. doi: 10.1007/s12152-011-9100-1. Epub 2011 Feb 16.
3
Health, Happiness and Human Enhancement-Dealing with Unexpected Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation.健康、幸福与人类增强——应对脑深部电刺激的意外影响
Neuroethics. 2013;6(3):435-445. doi: 10.1007/s12152-011-9097-5. Epub 2011 Jan 27.
4
Does Memory Modification Threaten Our Authenticity?记忆修改会威胁到我们的本真性吗?
Neuroethics. 2011 Nov;4(3):235-249. doi: 10.1007/s12152-010-9090-4. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
5
Authenticity Anyone? The Enhancement of Emotions via Neuro-Psychopharmacology.谁来谈谈真实性?通过神经精神药理学增强情感。
Neuroethics. 2011 Apr;4(1):51-64. doi: 10.1007/s12152-010-9075-3. Epub 2010 May 15.
6
Electrodes in the brain--ethical criteria for research and treatment with deep brain stimulation for neuropsychiatric disorders.脑内电极——神经精神障碍的深部脑刺激研究和治疗的伦理标准。
Brain Stimul. 2011 Jan;4(1):7-16. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Mar 21.
7
Philosophical reflections on narrative and deep brain stimulation.关于叙事与深部脑刺激的哲学思考
J Clin Ethics. 2010 Summer;21(2):133-9.
8
Deep brain stimulation and the neuroethics of responsible publishing: when one is not enough.深部脑刺激与负责任发表的神经伦理学:当一种方法不够用时。
JAMA. 2010 Feb 24;303(8):775-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.140.
9
Deep brain stimulation, deontology and duty: the moral obligation of non-abandonment at the neural interface.深部脑刺激、道义论与责任:神经接口处不放弃的道德义务
J Neural Eng. 2009 Oct;6(5):050201. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/6/5/050201. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
10
Autonomy and authenticity of enhanced personality traits.增强人格特质的自主性与真实性。
Bioethics. 2009 Jul;23(6):360-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01725.x.

我、我自己与我的脑植入物:深度脑刺激引发了关于个人真实性与疏离感的问题。

Me, Myself and My Brain Implant: Deep Brain Stimulation Raises Questions of Personal Authenticity and Alienation.

作者信息

Kraemer Felicitas

机构信息

Philosophy & Ethics, Eindhoven University of Technology, IPO 1.01, PO Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Neuroethics. 2013;6(3):483-497. doi: 10.1007/s12152-011-9115-7. Epub 2011 May 12.

DOI:10.1007/s12152-011-9115-7
PMID:24273619
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3825521/
Abstract

In this article, I explore select case studies of Parkinson patients treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS) in light of the notions of alienation and authenticity. While the literature on DBS has so far neglected the issues of authenticity and alienation, I argue that interpreting these cases in terms of these concepts raises new issues for not only the philosophical discussion of neuro-ethics of DBS, but also for the psychological and medical approach to patients under DBS. In particular, I suggest that the experience of alienation and authenticity varies from patient to patient with DBS. For some, alienation can be brought about by neurointerventions because patients no longer feel like themselves. But, on the other hand, it seems alienation can also be cured by DBS as other patients experience their state of mind as authentic under treatment and retrospectively regard their former lives without stimulation as alienated. I argue that we must do further research on the relevance of authenticity and alienation to patients treated with DBS in order to gain a deeper philosophical understanding, and to develop the best evaluative criterion for the behavior of DBS patients.

摘要

在本文中,我根据异化和本真性的概念,探讨了接受脑深部电刺激(DBS)治疗的帕金森病患者的一些精选案例研究。虽然迄今为止关于DBS的文献忽略了本真性和异化问题,但我认为,从这些概念的角度解读这些案例,不仅为DBS神经伦理学的哲学讨论,也为接受DBS治疗的患者的心理学和医学治疗方法提出了新问题。特别是,我认为接受DBS治疗的患者的异化和本真性体验因人而异。对一些人来说,神经干预可能会导致异化,因为患者不再感觉自己像自己了。但另一方面,DBS似乎也可以治愈异化,因为其他患者在治疗过程中体验到自己的心理状态是真实的,并回顾性地认为自己以前没有刺激的生活是异化的。我认为,我们必须进一步研究本真性和异化与接受DBS治疗的患者的相关性,以便获得更深入的哲学理解,并为DBS患者的行为制定最佳评估标准。