Hajj-Chahine Jamil, Dahdouh Ziad S, Abdel-Massih Tony
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France;
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2013 Nov;13(4):581-4. doi: 10.12816/0003319. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
There is conflicting evidence guiding valve prosthesis selection in patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis. We sought to determine, after reviewing the relevant literature, the best valve substitute in patients on chronic dialysis. A total of 9 retrospective studies compared the outcomes of two valves, showing similar results and highlighting the safety of implanting bioprostheses in patients on chronic dialysis. Standards of valve selection have changed over time; it has long been believed that tissue valves undergo premature degeneration due to calcium metabolism derangements in patients with end-stage renal disease. Bleeding was the most common valve-related complication and represented a major drawback of mechanical valves. Two studies demonstrated a survival advantage in favour of mechanical prostheses. It can be concluded that surgeons should not hesitate to implant bioprostheses because singular valve decomposition would be uncommon in this patient population. Prosthesis selection should be based on the same criteria as those used for non-dialysis patients.
对于接受透析的终末期肾病患者,在瓣膜假体选择方面存在相互矛盾的证据。在查阅相关文献后,我们试图确定慢性透析患者的最佳瓣膜替代品。共有9项回顾性研究比较了两种瓣膜的结果,结果相似,并突出了在慢性透析患者中植入生物假体的安全性。瓣膜选择标准随时间而变化;长期以来,人们一直认为组织瓣膜会因终末期肾病患者钙代谢紊乱而过早退化。出血是最常见的与瓣膜相关的并发症,也是机械瓣膜的一个主要缺点。两项研究表明机械假体具有生存优势。可以得出结论,外科医生不应犹豫植入生物假体,因为在该患者群体中单个瓣膜分解并不常见。假体选择应基于与非透析患者相同的标准。