Suppr超能文献

监测儿童哮喘:基于网络的日记和哮喘控制测试。

Monitoring childhood asthma: web-based diaries and the asthma control test.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, Erasmus University Medical Centre - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Pediatrics, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Jun;133(6):1599-605.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.10.005. Epub 2013 Nov 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data from asthma diaries are frequently used as an end point in asthma studies; however, data on the validity of Web-based diaries are scarce.

OBJECTIVES

First, we examined the validity of a Web-based diary in assessing asthma control. Second, we determined the cutoff points for well-controlled asthma of the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) and the Asthma Control Test (ACT), and calculated the minimal important difference for both tests.

METHODS

Children with asthma, ages 4-18 years (n = 228) completed a 4-week Web-based diary, C-ACT, ACT, and an asthma-related quality-of-life questionnaire at baseline and after 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

The completion rate of the Web-based diaries was 89%. The diary scores correlated strongly with C-ACT and ACT scores (r = -0.73, P < .01; r = -0.64, P < .01, respectively) and the changes in diary scores correlated well with changes in C-ACT and ACT scores. The best cutoff points for well-controlled asthma were C-ACT ≥ 22 and ACT ≥ 23. The minimal important differences were 1.9 (95% CI, 1.3-2.5) for ACT and 1.6 (95% CI, 1.1-2.1) for C-ACT, and -0.7 points/d (95% CI, -1.1 to -0.4) for the Web-based diary.

CONCLUSIONS

Our Web-based diary was valid for recording asthma symptoms. Cutoff points of ≥22 (C-ACT) and ≥23 (ACT) define well-controlled asthma. We recommend a 2 C-ACT and ACT points difference as minimally important.

摘要

背景

哮喘日记中的数据常被用作哮喘研究的终点,但基于网络的日记数据的有效性却鲜有报道。

目的

首先,我们检验了基于网络的哮喘日记评估哮喘控制的有效性。其次,我们确定了儿童哮喘控制测试(C-ACT)和哮喘控制测试(ACT)中哮喘控制良好的切点,并计算了这两个测试的最小临床重要差异。

方法

年龄在 4-18 岁的哮喘患儿(n=228)在基线时和 1 年随访时完成了为期 4 周的基于网络的日记、C-ACT、ACT 和哮喘相关生活质量问卷。

结果

网络日记的完成率为 89%。日记评分与 C-ACT 和 ACT 评分相关性较强(r=-0.73,P<.01;r=-0.64,P<.01),且日记评分的变化与 C-ACT 和 ACT 评分的变化密切相关。哮喘控制良好的最佳切点为 C-ACT≥22 和 ACT≥23。ACT 和 C-ACT 的最小临床重要差异分别为 1.9(95%CI,1.3-2.5)和 1.6(95%CI,1.1-2.1),基于网络的日记为-0.7 分/天(95%CI,-1.1 至-0.4)。

结论

我们的基于网络的日记可有效记录哮喘症状。≥22(C-ACT)和≥23(ACT)的切点定义为哮喘控制良好。我们建议将 2 个 C-ACT 和 ACT 点的差异作为最小临床重要差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验