Institute of Industrial Ecology, the Urals Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 20 Sofia Kovalevskaya Str., Ekaterinburg 620990, Russia.
Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers, 30 Popov Str., Ekaterinburg 620014, Russia.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2014 Feb;64:144-56. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.11.024. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
Rats were exposed intraperitoneally (3 times a week up to 20 injections) to either Cadmium and Lead salts in doses equivalent to their 0.05 LD50 separately or combined in the same or halved doses. Toxic effects were assessed by more than 40 functional, biochemical and morphometric indices. We analysed the results obtained aiming at determination of the type of combined toxicity using either common sense considerations based on descriptive statistics or two mathematical models based (a) on ANOVA and (b) on Mathematical Theory of Experimental Design, which correspond, respectively, to the widely recognised paradigms of effect additivity and dose additivity. Nevertheless, these approaches have led us unanimously to the following conclusions: (1) The above paradigms are virtually interchangeable and should be regarded as different methods of modelling the combined toxicity rather than as reflecting fundamentally differing processes. (2) Within both models there exist not merely three traditionally used types of combined toxicity (additivity, subadditivity and superadditivity) but at least 10 variants of it depending on exactly which effect is considered and on its level, as well as on the dose levels and their ratio.
大鼠经腹腔内暴露(每周 3 次,最多 20 次注射),分别给予相当于其 0.05 LD50 的剂量的镉和铅盐,或相同或减半剂量的混合盐。通过 40 多个功能、生化和形态计量学指标评估毒性效应。我们分析了获得的结果,旨在使用基于描述性统计的常识考虑或基于(a)方差分析和(b)实验设计数学理论的两个数学模型来确定联合毒性的类型,这分别对应于公认的效应加性和剂量加性范式。然而,这些方法一致地引导我们得出以下结论:(1)上述范式几乎可以互换,应被视为联合毒性的建模不同方法,而不是反映根本不同的过程。(2)在这两种模型中,不仅存在传统上使用的三种联合毒性类型(加性、亚加性和超加性),而且至少有 10 种变体,具体取决于所考虑的效果及其水平,以及剂量水平及其比值。