Joseph Sarah B, Arrildt Kathryn T, Swanstrom Adrienne E, Schnell Gretja, Lee Benhur, Hoxie James A, Swanstrom Ronald
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
J Virol. 2014 Feb;88(4):1858-69. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02477-13. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
Defining a macrophage-tropic phenotype for HIV-1 to assess a role in pathogenesis is complicated by the fact that HIV-1 isolates vary continuously in their ability to enter monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) in vitro, and MDMs vary in their ability to support HIV-1 entry. To overcome these limitations, we identified consistent differences in entry phenotypes between five paired blood-derived, T cell-tropic HIV-1 env genes, four of which are CCR5-using (R5) and one of which is CXCR4-using (X4), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-derived, R5 macrophage-tropic env genes. We performed entry assays using the CD4- and CCR5-inducible Affinofile cell line, expressing a range of CD4 levels that approximates the range from MDMs to CD4(+) T cells. The macrophage-tropic viruses were significantly better at infecting cells expressing low levels of CD4 than the T cell-tropic viruses from the same subjects, with the titration of CD4 providing a distinctive and quantitative phenotype. This difference in CD4 utilization was not due to macrophage-tropic viruses being CD4 independent. Furthermore, macrophage-tropic viruses did not differ from paired T cell-tropic viruses in their ability to use low levels of CCR5 (tpaired = -1.39; P = 0.24) or their use of an alternative conformation of CCR5. We also infected MDMs with a panel of viruses and observed that infectivity of each virus differed across four donors and between three preparations from a single donor. We concluded that the evolutionary transition from replication in T cells to that in macrophages involves a phenotypic transition to acquire the ability to infect cells expressing low levels of CD4 and that this phenotype is more reliably measured in Affinofile cells than in macrophages. IMPORTANCE HIV-1 typically infects memory T cells by using CD4 and CCR5 to enter cells. The virus evolves to infect new cell types by changing the coreceptor from CCR5 to CXCR4 to infect naive T cells or adapting to the use of low levels of CD4 to infect macrophages. However, defining the phenotype of macrophage tropism has been difficult due to inherent variability in the use of macrophages generated in culture to support entry of HIV-1. We describe the use of Affinofile cells with inducible and variable levels of CD4 to identify a signature phenotype for macrophage-tropic HIV-1. The ability to define HIV-1 variants that have evolved an entry phenotype that allows more efficient entry into cells with low levels of CD4 sets the stage for a clearer placement of these variants in HIV-associated pathogenesis.
定义HIV-1的巨噬细胞嗜性表型以评估其在发病机制中的作用很复杂,因为HIV-1分离株在体外进入单核细胞衍生巨噬细胞(MDM)的能力不断变化,且MDM支持HIV-1进入的能力也存在差异。为克服这些限制,我们在五对血液来源的、嗜T细胞的HIV-1 env基因(其中四个使用CCR5,即R5型,一个使用CXCR4,即X4型)和脑脊液(CSF)来源的、R5巨噬细胞嗜性env基因之间的进入表型中发现了一致的差异。我们使用可诱导表达一系列CD4水平的Affinofile细胞系进行进入试验,该CD4水平范围近似于MDM到CD4(+) T细胞的水平范围。与来自同一受试者的嗜T细胞病毒相比,嗜巨噬细胞病毒在感染低水平表达CD4的细胞方面明显更有效,CD4滴定提供了一种独特且定量的表型。CD4利用上的这种差异并非由于嗜巨噬细胞病毒不依赖CD4。此外,嗜巨噬细胞病毒在使用低水平CCR5的能力(t配对 = -1.39;P = 0.24)或使用CCR5的替代构象方面与配对的嗜T细胞病毒没有差异。我们还用一组病毒感染了MDM,观察到每种病毒在四个供体之间以及单个供体的三种制剂之间的感染性存在差异。我们得出结论,从在T细胞中复制到在巨噬细胞中复制的进化转变涉及表型转变,以获得感染低水平表达CD4的细胞的能力,并且这种表型在Affinofile细胞中比在巨噬细胞中更可靠地测量。重要性:HIV-1通常通过使用CD4和CCR5进入细胞来感染记忆T细胞。病毒通过将共受体从CCR5改变为CXCR4以感染初始T细胞或适应使用低水平CD4来感染巨噬细胞而进化以感染新的细胞类型。然而,由于培养中产生的用于支持HIV-1进入的巨噬细胞使用方面的固有变异性,定义巨噬细胞嗜性表型一直很困难。我们描述了使用具有可诱导和可变水平CD4的Affinofile细胞来鉴定嗜巨噬细胞HIV-1的特征表型。定义已进化出允许更有效地进入低水平表达CD4的细胞的进入表型的HIV-1变体的能力为在HIV相关发病机制中更清楚地定位这些变体奠定了基础。