Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jan;24(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2013.08.003.
Technological advances are a major contributor to rising costs in health care, including radiation oncology. Despite the large amount spent on new technologies, technology assessment remains inadequate, leading to potentially costly and unnecessary use of new technologies. Comparative effectiveness studies have an important role to play in evaluating the benefits and harms of new technologies compared with older technologies and have been identified as a priority area for research by the Radiation Oncology Institute. This article outlines the elements of effective technology assessment, identifies key challenges to comparative effectiveness studies of new radiation oncology technologies, and reviews several examples of comparative effectiveness studies in radiation oncology, including studies on conformal radiation, IMRT, proton therapy, and other concurrent new technologies.
技术进步是医疗保健成本上升的主要因素,包括放射肿瘤学。尽管在新技术上投入了大量资金,但技术评估仍然不足,导致新技术的潜在昂贵和不必要的使用。与旧技术相比,比较有效性研究在评估新技术的益处和危害方面发挥着重要作用,并且被放射肿瘤学研究所确定为研究的优先领域。本文概述了有效技术评估的要素,确定了新放射肿瘤学技术的比较有效性研究的关键挑战,并回顾了放射肿瘤学中的几项比较有效性研究的例子,包括适形放疗、调强放疗、质子治疗和其他新的联合技术。