Gerontology Research Program, Department of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Geriatric Medicine Department, Alexandra Hospital, Ministry of Health, Singapore.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Jan;15(1):76.e7-76.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.10.001. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
This study aimed to examine the cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships between physical frailty at baseline and depressive symptoms at baseline and at follow-up.
Four-year prospective study.
Communities in the South East Region of Singapore.
We analyzed data of 1827 older Chinese adults aged 55 and above in the Singapore Longitudinal Aging Study-I.
The frailty phenotype (based on Fried criteria) was determined at baseline, depressive symptoms (Geriatric Depression Scale ≥ 5) at baseline and follow-ups at 2 and 4 years.
The mean age of the population was 65.9 (standard deviation 7.26). At baseline, 11.4% (n = 209) had depressive symptoms, 32.4% (n = 591) were prefrail and 2.5% (n = 46) were frail. In cross-sectional analysis of baseline data, the adjusted odds ratios (OR)s and 95% confidence intervals controlling for demographic, comorbidities, and other confounders were 1.69 (1.23-2.33) for prefrailty and 2.36 (1.08-5.15) for frailty, (P for linear trend <.001). In longitudinal data analyses, prospective associations among all participants were: prefrail: OR = 1.86 (1.08-3.20); frail: OR = 3.09 (1.12-8.50); (P for linear trend = .009). Among participants free of depressive symptoms at baseline, similar prospective associations were found: prefrail OR = 2.26 (1.12-4.57); frail: OR = 3.75 (1.07-13.16); (P for linear trend = .009).
These data support a significant role of frailty as a predictor of depression in a relatively younger old Chinese population. Further observational and interventional studies should explore short-term dynamic and bidirectional associations and the effects of frailty reversal on depression risk.
本研究旨在探讨基线时身体虚弱与基线和随访时抑郁症状之间的横断面和纵向关系。
四年前瞻性研究。
新加坡东南部社区。
我们分析了新加坡老龄化纵向研究-I 中 1827 名 55 岁及以上的华裔老年人的数据。
虚弱表型(基于 Fried 标准)在基线时确定,抑郁症状(老年抑郁量表≥5)在基线和 2 年和 4 年的随访时确定。
人群的平均年龄为 65.9(标准差 7.26)。基线时,11.4%(n=209)有抑郁症状,32.4%(n=591)为虚弱前期,2.5%(n=46)为虚弱。在基线数据的横断面分析中,调整后的优势比(OR)及其 95%置信区间,控制了人口统计学、合并症和其他混杂因素,分别为虚弱前期 1.69(1.23-2.33)和虚弱 2.36(1.08-5.15)(P 趋势<0.001)。在纵向数据分析中,所有参与者的前瞻性关联为:虚弱前期:OR=1.86(1.08-3.20);虚弱:OR=3.09(1.12-8.50)(P 趋势=0.009)。在基线时无抑郁症状的参与者中,也发现了类似的前瞻性关联:虚弱前期 OR=2.26(1.12-4.57);虚弱:OR=3.75(1.07-13.16)(P 趋势=0.009)。
这些数据支持虚弱作为一个相对年轻的华裔老年人中抑郁的预测因素的重要作用。进一步的观察性和干预性研究应该探索短期动态和双向关联以及虚弱逆转对抑郁风险的影响。