Yasuda Tomohiro, Loenneke J P, Ogasawara R, Abe T
University of Tokyo Department of Ischemic Circulatory Physiology, Graduate School of Medicine 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku Tokyo 113-8655 Japan.
Acta Physiol Hung. 2013 Dec;100(4):419-26. doi: 10.1556/APhysiol.100.2013.4.6.
Low-intensity resistance exercise with blood flow restriction (BFR) has been shown to induce a prominent increase in muscle activation in response to muscle fatigue. However, the magnitude of muscle fatigue between continuous (Con-BFR) and intermittent BFR (Int-BFR, BFR only during exercise) is currently unknown. We examined the effect of Con-BFR or Int-BFR on muscle activation during exercise. Unilateral arm curl exercise (20% of one-repetition maximum, four sets, 30 sec rest period between sets) was performed without (CON) or with Con-BFR or Int-BFR. During BFR conditions, the cuff was inflated to 160 mmHg on the proximal region of testing arm. Surface electromyography (EMG) was recorded from the biceps brachii muscle, and integrated EMG (iEMG) was analyzed. During the exercise, iEMG increased progressively in Con-BFR and Int-BFR and both conditions were greater (p < 0.05) than CON at the 3rd and 4th set. However, there were no differences (p > 0.05) in iEMG between Con-BFR and Int-BFR during exercise (∼2.45 and ∼2.40 times, respectively). Thus, the magnitude of increase in muscle activation may be similar between Con-BFR and Int-BFR when BFR exercise was performed at a high level of cuff pressure intensity.
有研究表明,低强度抗阻运动结合血流限制(BFR)可在肌肉疲劳时显著增加肌肉激活。然而,目前尚不清楚持续血流限制(Con-BFR)和间歇性血流限制(Int-BFR,仅在运动期间进行BFR)之间肌肉疲劳的程度。我们研究了Con-BFR或Int-BFR对运动期间肌肉激活的影响。进行单侧手臂弯举运动(1次重复最大值的20%,四组,组间休息30秒),分为不进行BFR(CON)、进行Con-BFR或Int-BFR。在BFR条件下,将袖带在测试手臂近端区域充气至160 mmHg。记录肱二头肌的表面肌电图(EMG),并分析积分肌电图(iEMG)。运动期间,Con-BFR和Int-BFR组的iEMG逐渐增加,且在第3组和第4组时,这两种条件下的iEMG均高于CON组(p<0.05)。然而,运动期间Con-BFR和Int-BFR组的iEMG之间无差异(p>0.05)(分别约为2.45倍和2.40倍)。因此,当在较高袖带压力强度下进行BFR运动时,Con-BFR和Int-BFR之间肌肉激活增加的幅度可能相似。