Suppr超能文献

对军人研究评估服务人员风险和适应力(Army STARRS)中的复合国际诊断访谈筛查量表(CIDI-SC)进行临床再评估。

Clinical reappraisal of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Screening Scales (CIDI-SC) in the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS).

机构信息

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2013 Dec;22(4):303-21. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1398.

Abstract

A clinical reappraisal study was carried out in conjunction with the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS) All-Army Study (AAS) to evaluate concordance of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) diagnoses based on the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Screening Scales (CIDI-SC) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) checklist (PCL) with diagnoses based on independent clinical reappraisal interviews (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV [SCID]). Diagnoses included: lifetime mania/hypomania, panic disorder, and intermittent explosive disorder; six-month adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; and 30-day major depressive episode, generalized anxiety disorder, PTSD, and substance (alcohol or drug) use disorder (abuse or dependence). The sample (n = 460) was weighted for over-sampling CIDI-SC/PCL screened positives. Diagnostic thresholds were set to equalize false positives and false negatives. Good individual-level concordance was found between CIDI-SC/PCL and SCID diagnoses at these thresholds (area under curve [AUC] = 0.69-0.79). AUC was considerably higher for continuous than dichotomous screening scale scores (AUC = 0.80-0.90), arguing for substantive analyses using not only dichotomous case designations but also continuous measures of predicted probabilities of clinical diagnoses.

摘要

进行了一项临床再评估研究,该研究与陆军军人风险和适应力评估研究(Army STARRS)全陆军研究(AAS)合作,以评估根据复合国际诊断访谈筛选量表(CIDI-SC)和创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL)进行的《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)诊断与基于独立临床再评估访谈的诊断(DSM-IV 结构临床访谈 [SCID])的一致性。诊断包括:终生躁狂/轻躁狂、惊恐障碍和间歇性爆发障碍;六个月成人注意力缺陷/多动障碍;以及 30 天重度抑郁发作、广泛性焦虑障碍、创伤后应激障碍和物质(酒精或药物)使用障碍(滥用或依赖)。该样本(n=460)经过加权处理,以对 CIDI-SC/PCL 筛查阳性进行过采样。诊断阈值设定为使假阳性和假阴性相等。在这些阈值下,CIDI-SC/PCL 和 SCID 诊断之间发现了良好的个体水平一致性(曲线下面积 [AUC] = 0.69-0.79)。与二分类筛查量表评分相比,连续评分的 AUC 要高得多(AUC=0.80-0.90),这表明不仅要使用二分类病例设计,还要使用连续的临床诊断预测概率测量值进行实质性分析。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验