Cardiology Division, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Circ Heart Fail. 2014 Jan;7(1):5-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000344. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) levels are associated with risk for heart failure (HF). The soluble TNF type 1 (sTNF-R1) and type 2 (sTNF-R2) receptors are elevated in patients with manifest HF, but whether they are associated with risk for incident HF is unclear.
Using Cox proportional hazard models, we examined the association between baseline levels of sTNF-R1 and sTNF-R2 with incident HF risk among 1285 participants of the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study (age, 74.0±2.9 years; 51.4% women; 41.1% black). At baseline, median (interquartile range) of TNF, sTNF-R1, and sTNF-R2 levels was 3.14 (2.42-4.06), 1.46 (1.25-1.76), and 3.43 (2.95-4.02) ng/mL, respectively. During a median follow-up of 11.4 (6.9-11.7) years, 233 (18.1%) participants developed HF. In models controlling for other HF risk factors, TNF (hazard ratio [HR], 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.61 per log2 increase) and sTNF-R1 (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.15-2.46 per log2 increase), but not sTNF-R2 (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.80-1.63 per log2 increase), were associated with a higher risk for HF. These associations were consistent across whites and blacks (TNF, sTNF-R1, sTNF-R2; interaction P=0.531, 0.091, and 0.795, respectively) and in both sexes (TNF, sTNF-R1, sTNF-R2; interaction P=0.491, 0.672, and 0.999, respectively). TNF-R1 was associated with a higher risk for HF with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.03-3.18; P=0.038 for preserved versus HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.56-1.44; P=0.667 for reduced ejection fraction; interaction P=0.05).
In older adults, elevated levels of sTNF-R1 are associated with increased risk for incident HF. However, addition of TNF-R1 to the previously validated Health ABC HF risk model did not demonstrate material improvement in net discrimination or reclassification.
肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)水平与心力衰竭(HF)风险相关。在有明显 HF 的患者中,可溶性 TNF 型 1(sTNF-R1)和型 2(sTNF-R2)受体升高,但它们是否与 HF 发病风险相关尚不清楚。
我们使用 Cox 比例风险模型,在 1285 名健康、衰老和身体成分研究(年龄,74.0±2.9 岁;51.4%女性;41.1%黑人)参与者中,检查基线 sTNF-R1 和 sTNF-R2 水平与 HF 发病风险之间的关系。在基线时,TNF、sTNF-R1 和 sTNF-R2 水平的中位数(四分位距)分别为 3.14(2.42-4.06)、1.46(1.25-1.76)和 3.43(2.95-4.02)ng/mL。在中位数为 11.4(6.9-11.7)年的随访期间,233 名(18.1%)参与者发生 HF。在控制其他 HF 风险因素的模型中,TNF(风险比[HR],每增加 1log2,1.28;95%置信区间[CI],1.02-1.61)和 sTNF-R1(HR,每增加 1log2,1.68;95%CI,1.15-2.46),但不是 sTNF-R2(HR,每增加 1log2,1.15;95%CI,0.80-1.63),与 HF 发病风险增加相关。这些关联在白人和黑人之间是一致的(TNF、sTNF-R1、sTNF-R2;交互 P=0.531、0.091 和 0.795),在两性之间也是一致的(TNF、sTNF-R1、sTNF-R2;交互 P=0.491、0.672 和 0.999)。与射血分数保留的 HF 相比,sTNF-R1 与射血分数降低的 HF 风险更高(HR,1.81;95%CI,1.03-3.18;P=0.038 与保留的 HR,0.90;95%CI,0.56-1.44;P=0.667 与射血分数降低;交互 P=0.05)。
在老年人中,sTNF-R1 水平升高与 HF 发病风险增加相关。然而,将 TNF-R1 加入到之前验证的健康 ABC HF 风险模型中并没有在净判别或重新分类方面显示出实质性的改善。