• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同性伴侣的国家和州特定医疗保险差距。

National and state-specific health insurance disparities for adults in same-sex relationships.

机构信息

Gilbert Gonzales and Lynn A. Blewett are with the Division of Health Policy and Management and the State Health Access Data Assistance Center, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104(2):e95-e104. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301577. Epub 2013 Dec 12.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301577
PMID:24328616
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3935660/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We examined national and state-specific disparities in health insurance coverage, specifically employer-sponsored insurance (ESI) coverage, for adults in same-sex relationships.

METHODS

We used data from the American Community Survey to identify adults (aged 25-64 years) in same-sex relationships (n = 31,947), married opposite-sex relationships (n = 3,060,711), and unmarried opposite-sex relationships (n = 259,147). We estimated multinomial logistic regression models and state-specific relative differences in ESI coverage with predictive margins.

RESULTS

Men and women in same-sex relationships were less likely to have ESI than were their married counterparts in opposite-sex relationships. We found ESI disparities among adults in same-sex relationships in every region, but we found the largest ESI gaps for men in the South and for women in the Midwest. ESI disparities were narrower in states that had extended legal same-sex marriage, civil unions, and broad domestic partnerships.

CONCLUSIONS

Men and women in same-sex relationships experience disparities in health insurance coverage across the country, but residing in a state that recognizes legal same-sex marriage, civil unions, or broad domestic partnerships may improve access to ESI for same-sex spouses and domestic partners.

摘要

目的

我们研究了全国和各州在健康保险覆盖方面的差异,特别是针对同性关系成年人的雇主赞助保险(ESI)覆盖情况。

方法

我们使用美国社区调查的数据,确定了处于同性关系(n=31947 人)、已婚异性关系(n=3060711 人)和未婚异性关系(n=259147 人)的成年人(年龄在 25-64 岁之间)。我们使用预测边际估计了多变量逻辑回归模型和各州 ESI 覆盖的特定相对差异。

结果

与已婚异性关系中的对应者相比,同性关系中的男性和女性获得 ESI 的可能性较低。我们在每个地区都发现了同性关系成年人的 ESI 差距,但在南部地区的男性和中西部地区的女性中,发现了最大的 ESI 差距。在承认合法同性婚姻、民事结合和广泛的国内伙伴关系的州,ESI 差距较小。

结论

全国范围内,同性关系中的男性和女性在健康保险覆盖方面存在差异,但居住在承认合法同性婚姻、民事结合或广泛国内伙伴关系的州,可能会改善同性配偶和国内伙伴获得 ESI 的机会。

相似文献

1
National and state-specific health insurance disparities for adults in same-sex relationships.同性伴侣的国家和州特定医疗保险差距。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104(2):e95-e104. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301577. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
2
Health insurance disparities among racial/ethnic minorities in same-sex relationships: an intersectional approach.同性关系中种族/族裔少数群体的健康保险差异:一种交叉性方法。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Jun;105(6):1106-13. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302459. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
3
Health Insurance Coverage among Puerto Rican Adults in Same-Sex Relationships.波多黎各同性伴侣关系中的成年人群体的医疗保险覆盖情况。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2017;28(3):915-930. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2017.0088.
4
Same-Sex Marriage and Gains in Employer-Sponsored Insurance for US Adults, 2008-2017.同性婚姻与美国成年人雇主赞助保险的增益,2008-2017 年。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Apr;110(4):537-539. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305510. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
5
Winners and losers in health insurance: access and type of coverage for women in same-sex and opposite-sex partnerships.医疗保险中的赢家与输家:同性和异性伴侣关系中女性的保险覆盖范围与类型
Women Health. 2014;54(2):94-114. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2013.870633.
6
Disparities in health insurance among children with same-sex parents.儿童同性父母的健康保险差异。
Pediatrics. 2013 Oct;132(4):703-11. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-0988. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
7
Moderate Effects of Same-Sex Legislation on Dependent Employer-Based Insurance Coverage Among Sexual Minorities.同性婚姻立法对性少数群体中依赖雇主提供保险覆盖范围的适度影响。
Med Care Res Rev. 2016 Dec;73(6):752-768. doi: 10.1177/1077558715625560. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
8
Federal Employees Health Benefits and Federal Employees Dental and Vision Insurance Programs' Coverage Exception for Children of Same-Sex Domestic Partners. Interim final rule.
Fed Regist. 2016 Dec 2;81(232):86905-6.
9
Public insurance is increasingly crucial to American families even as employer-sponsored health insurance coverage ends its steady decline.即使雇主提供的健康保险覆盖范围结束了稳步下降的趋势,公共保险对美国家庭来说也变得越来越重要。
Int J Health Serv. 2014;44(3):525-52. doi: 10.2190/HS.44.3.f.
10
Disparities in health insurance coverage, access, and outcomes for individuals in same-sex versus different-sex relationships, 2000-2007.2000-2007 年,同性与异性伴侣在健康保险覆盖范围、可及性和结果方面的差异。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Mar;100(3):489-95. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.160804. Epub 2010 Jan 14.

引用本文的文献

1
More than Marriages: How Nepal's Marriage Equality Law Shape Public Health?超越婚姻:尼泊尔的婚姻平等法如何塑造公共卫生?
Health Prospect. 2024 Dec 14;23(3):28-30.
2
Sexual orientation differences in mental health service use and unmet mental health care needs: a cross-sectional population-based study of young adults.心理健康服务利用和未满足的心理健康护理需求中的性取向差异:一项基于人群的年轻成年人横断面研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Mar 11. doi: 10.1007/s00127-025-02866-8.
3
Rings and Rebuttals: A Quasi-Experimental Study on the Psychological Impact of Marriage Equality on Low-Income Black Sexual Minorities in the United Kingdom.婚姻平等与反驳:关于英国低收入黑人性少数群体婚姻平等心理影响的准实验研究
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 Feb;54(2):423-431. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-03067-1. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
4
Medicare Eligibility and Changes in Coverage, Access to Care, and Health by Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity.医疗保险资格和覆盖范围的变化、获得医疗保健的机会以及性取向和性别认同对健康的影响。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jul 5;5(7):e241756. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1756.
5
Sexual and Gender Minority Communication Skills (SGM Comskil) Training for Oncology Clinicians: Development, Implementation, and Preliminary Efficacy.肿瘤临床医生的性与性别少数群体沟通技巧(SGM Comskil)培训:开发、实施及初步疗效
Ann LGBTQ Public Popul Health. 2021 Mar;2(1):35-52. doi: 10.1891/lgbtq-2020-0016.
6
Assessing Medical Students' Attitudes and Knowledge Regarding LGBTQ Health Needs Across the United States.评估美国医学生对 LGBTQ 健康需求的态度和知识。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;14:21501319231186729. doi: 10.1177/21501319231186729.
7
Challenges and opportunities for medical referrals at a mobile community health clinic serving sexual and gender minorities in rural South Carolina: a qualitative approach.为南卡罗来纳州农村地区的性少数群体和性别少数群体服务的流动社区健康诊所转介面临的挑战和机遇:一种定性方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 17;23(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09141-z.
8
Effects of the affordable care Act's Medicaid expansion on health insurance coverage for individuals in same-sex couples.平价医疗法案的医疗补助扩大对同性伴侣中个人的健康保险覆盖范围的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun;58(3):612-621. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14128. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
9
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Women's Health Care Access: A Cross-Sectional Study.COVID-19 大流行对妇女获得医疗保健的影响:一项横断面研究。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Dec;31(12):1690-1702. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0128. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
10
The Institutional Determinants of Health Insurance: Moving Away from Labor Market, Marriage, and Family Attachments under the ACA.医疗保险的制度决定因素:在《平价医疗法案》下摆脱劳动力市场、婚姻和家庭纽带的影响。
Am Sociol Rev. 2018 Dec 1;83(6):1144-1170. doi: 10.1177/0003122418811112. Epub 2018 Nov 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Same-sex legal marriage and psychological well-being: findings from the California Health Interview Survey.同性婚姻与心理健康:来自加利福尼亚健康访谈调查的发现。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Feb;103(2):339-46. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301113. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
2
Effect of same-sex marriage laws on health care use and expenditures in sexual minority men: a quasi-natural experiment.同性婚姻法律对性少数男性医疗保健使用和支出的影响:一项准自然实验。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Feb;102(2):285-91. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300382. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
3
Public health implications of same-sex marriage.同性婚姻的公共卫生影响。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Jun;101(6):986-90. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300112. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
4
The effects of unequal access to health insurance for same-sex couples in California.加利福尼亚州同性伴侣享受健康保险不平等的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Aug;29(8):1539-48. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0583. Epub 2010 Jun 24.
5
Disparities in health insurance coverage, access, and outcomes for individuals in same-sex versus different-sex relationships, 2000-2007.2000-2007 年,同性与异性伴侣在健康保险覆盖范围、可及性和结果方面的差异。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Mar;100(3):489-95. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.160804. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
6
Gay and lesbian partnership: evidence from California.同性恋伴侣关系:来自加利福尼亚的证据。
Demography. 2008 Aug;45(3):573-90. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0014.
7
What's the Risk? A simple approach for estimating adjusted risk measures from nonlinear models including logistic regression.风险是什么?一种从包括逻辑回归在内的非线性模型估计调整后风险度量的简单方法。
Health Serv Res. 2009 Feb;44(1):288-302. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00900.x. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
8
The U.S. economy and changes in health insurance coverage, 2000-2006.2000 - 2006年美国经济与医疗保险覆盖范围的变化
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Mar-Apr;27(2):w135-44. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.2.w135. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
9
Health care access among individuals involved in same-sex relationships.参与同性关系的个体获得医疗保健的情况。
Am J Public Health. 2006 Jun;96(6):1111-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.062661. Epub 2006 May 2.
10
Demographics of the gay and lesbian population in the United States: evidence from available systematic data sources.美国同性恋人群的人口统计学特征:来自现有系统数据源的证据。
Demography. 2000 May;37(2):139-54.