Sigdel Tara K, Salomonis Nathan, Nicora Carrie D, Ryu Soyoung, He Jintang, Dinh Van, Orton Daniel J, Moore Ronald J, Hsieh Szu-Chuan, Dai Hong, Thien-Vu Minh, Xiao Wenzhong, Smith Richard D, Qian Wei-Jun, Camp David G, Sarwal Minnie M
California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, 475 Brannan St., Ste 220, San Francisco, California 9410;
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014 Feb;13(2):621-31. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M113.030577. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
Early transplant dysfunction and failure because of immunological and nonimmunological factors still presents a significant clinical problem for transplant recipients. A critical unmet need is the noninvasive detection and prediction of immune injury such that acute injury can be reversed by proactive immunosuppression titration. In this study, we used iTRAQ -based proteomic discovery and targeted ELISA validation to discover and validate candidate urine protein biomarkers from 262 renal allograft recipients with biopsy-confirmed allograft injury. Urine samples were randomly split into a training set of 108 patients and an independent validation set of 154 patients, which comprised the clinical biopsy-confirmed phenotypes of acute rejection (AR) (n = 74), stable graft (STA) (n = 74), chronic allograft injury (CAI) (n = 58), BK virus nephritis (BKVN) (n = 38), nephrotic syndrome (NS) (n = 8), and healthy, normal control (HC) (n = 10). A total of 389 proteins were measured that displayed differential abundances across urine specimens of the injury types (p < 0.05) with a significant finding that SUMO2 (small ubiquitin-related modifier 2) was identified as a "hub" protein for graft injury irrespective of causation. Sixty-nine urine proteins had differences in abundance (p < 0.01) in AR compared with stable graft, of which 12 proteins were up-regulated in AR with a mean fold increase of 2.8. Nine urine proteins were highly specific for AR because of their significant differences (p < 0.01; fold increase >1.5) from all other transplant categories (HLA class II protein HLA-DRB1, KRT14, HIST1H4B, FGG, ACTB, FGB, FGA, KRT7, DPP4). Increased levels of three of these proteins, fibrinogen beta (FGB; p = 0.04), fibrinogen gamma (FGG; p = 0.03), and HLA DRB1 (p = 0.003) were validated by ELISA in AR using an independent sample set. The fibrinogen proteins further segregated AR from BK virus nephritis (FGB p = 0.03, FGG p = 0.02), a finding that supports the utility of monitoring these urinary proteins for the specific and sensitive noninvasive diagnosis of acute renal allograft rejection.
由于免疫和非免疫因素导致的早期移植功能障碍和失败,仍然是移植受者面临的一个重大临床问题。一个关键的未满足需求是对免疫损伤进行非侵入性检测和预测,以便通过积极的免疫抑制滴定来逆转急性损伤。在本研究中,我们使用基于iTRAQ的蛋白质组学发现和靶向ELISA验证,从262例经活检证实存在移植肾损伤的肾移植受者中发现并验证候选尿蛋白生物标志物。尿样被随机分为一个包含108例患者的训练集和一个包含154例患者的独立验证集,后者包括急性排斥反应(AR)(n = 74)、移植稳定(STA)(n = 74)、慢性移植肾损伤(CAI)(n = 58)、BK病毒肾炎(BKVN)(n = 38)、肾病综合征(NS)(n = 8)以及健康正常对照(HC)(n = 10)的经临床活检证实的表型。共检测到389种蛋白质,这些蛋白质在不同损伤类型的尿标本中丰度存在差异(p < 0.05),一个重要发现是,无论病因如何,SUMO2(小泛素相关修饰因子2)被确定为移植肾损伤的“核心”蛋白。与移植稳定组相比,69种尿蛋白在AR中的丰度存在差异(p < 0.01),其中12种蛋白在AR中上调,平均上调倍数为2.8。9种尿蛋白对AR具有高度特异性,因为它们与所有其他移植类别存在显著差异(p < 0.01;上调倍数>1.5)(II类组织相容性抗原蛋白HLA-DRB1、角蛋白14、组蛋白H4B、纤维蛋白原γ、肌动蛋白、纤维蛋白原β、纤维蛋白原α、角蛋白7、二肽基肽酶4)。通过ELISA在AR中使用独立样本集验证了其中三种蛋白纤维蛋白原β(FGB;p = 0.04)、纤维蛋白原γ(FGG;p = 0.03)和HLA DRB1(p = 0.003)水平的升高。纤维蛋白原蛋白进一步将AR与BK病毒肾炎区分开来(FGB p = 0.03,FGG p = 0.02),这一发现支持了监测这些尿蛋白用于急性肾移植排斥反应的特异性和敏感性非侵入性诊断的实用性。