Duke University.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 May;26(5):1021-38. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00542. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
In this study, we leveraged the high temporal resolution of EEG to examine the neural mechanisms underlying the flexible regulation of cognitive control that unfolds over different timescales. We measured behavioral and neural effects of color-word incongruency, as different groups of participants performed three different versions of color-word Stroop tasks in which the relative timing of the color and word features varied from trial to trial. For this purpose, we used a standard Stroop color identification task with equal congruent-to-incongruent proportions (50%/50%), along with two versions of the "Reverse Stroop" word identification tasks, for which we manipulated the incongruency proportion (50%/50% and 80%/20%). Two canonical ERP markers of neural processing of stimulus incongruency, the frontocentral negative polarity incongruency wave (NINC) and the late positive component (LPC), were evoked across the various conditions. Results indicated that color-word incongruency interacted with the relative feature timing, producing greater neural and behavioral effects when the task-irrelevant stimulus preceded the target, but still significant effects when it followed. Additionally, both behavioral and neural incongruency effects were reduced by nearly half in the word identification task (Reverse Stroop 50/50) relative to the color identification task (Stroop 50/50), with these effects essentially fully recovering when incongruent trials appeared only infrequently (Reverse Stroop 80/20). Across the conditions, NINC amplitudes closely paralleled RTs, indicating this component is sensitive to the overall level of stimulus conflict. In contrast, LPC amplitudes were largest with infrequent incongruent trials, suggesting a possible readjustment role when proactive control is reduced. These findings thus unveil distinct control mechanisms that unfold over time in response to conflicting stimulus input under different contexts.
在这项研究中,我们利用 EEG 的高时间分辨率来研究认知控制的灵活调节背后的神经机制,这些调节在不同的时间尺度上展开。我们通过测量颜色-词语不一致性的行为和神经效应,来检验不同的参与者群体在不同的时间尺度上执行三种不同版本的颜色-词语 Stroop 任务时的效果。在这种情况下,我们使用标准的 Stroop 颜色识别任务,其中一致和不一致的比例相等(50%/50%),以及两种“反转 Stroop”词识别任务的版本,我们对这些任务的不一致性比例(50%/50%和 80%/20%)进行了操作。两种用于神经处理刺激不一致性的典型 ERP 标记物,即额中央负极性不一致波(NINC)和晚期正成分(LPC),在各种条件下都被激发。结果表明,颜色-词语不一致性与相对特征时间相互作用,当任务无关的刺激先于目标出现时,会产生更大的神经和行为效应,但当它跟随目标出现时,仍然会产生显著的效应。此外,与颜色识别任务(Stroop 50/50)相比,在词识别任务(反转 Stroop 50/50)中,行为和神经不一致性效应分别降低了近一半,而当不一致性试验出现的频率较低时(反转 Stroop 80/20),这些效应基本完全恢复。在所有条件下,NINC 幅度与 RT 密切平行,表明该成分对整体刺激冲突水平敏感。相比之下,当主动控制减少时,LPC 幅度在不一致性试验出现频率较低时最大,表明其可能具有重新调整的作用。因此,这些发现揭示了在不同背景下,根据冲突刺激输入的不同,时间上展开的不同控制机制。