Cooper B
Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2014 Jun;23(2):141-6. doi: 10.1017/S2045796013000644. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
Introduction and objectives. Population-based research on mental disorders needs to keep pace with trends in general epidemiology. At present, this requirement is complicated by uncertainty within the parent discipline about its future development. The present study examines proposals for new directions in strategy and methods and considers their significance for psychiatric epidemiology. Method. Narrative review, cross-checked by search of English-language journals of epidemiology for new trends and developments reported in the years from 2000 onwards. Results. The proposals reviewed here are divided into three groups: 1. A new research paradigm of 'eco-epidemiology', which includes both individual risk factors and macro-environmental systems that mediate population levels of health and sickness. 2. Improved 'translation' of research findings - i.e. more rapid and effective implementation of epidemiological evidence into health policy and practice. 3. Adaptation of epidemiology to a globalised economy, with firmer regulation of funding and resources. Conclusions. Each of these proposals has implications for psychiatric epidemiology. Workers in this field, however, are still preoccupied by relatively specific problems of definition, measurement and classification, and so far the current debates in general epidemiology are scarcely reflected. The proposals outlined above call for: • a working model of eco-epidemiology as it relates to psychiatric disorders; • implementation strategies to encourage more active participation in epidemiological research by community health services and caregiver organisations; • international collaborative projects that offer practical benefits in training and service facilities for the countries taking part.
引言与目标。基于人群的精神障碍研究需要跟上一般流行病学的发展趋势。目前,由于该学科母体对其未来发展存在不确定性,这一要求变得复杂。本研究考察了战略和方法新方向的提议,并思考它们对精神疾病流行病学的意义。方法。进行叙述性综述,并通过检索2000年以来英文流行病学杂志报道的新趋势和新进展进行交叉核对。结果。这里所综述的提议分为三组:1. “生态流行病学”的新研究范式,它既包括个体风险因素,也包括调节人群健康和疾病水平的宏观环境系统。2. 改进研究结果的“转化”——即更迅速有效地将流行病学证据应用于卫生政策和实践。3. 使流行病学适应全球化经济,对资金和资源进行更严格的监管。结论。这些提议中的每一项都对精神疾病流行病学有影响。然而,该领域的工作者仍专注于相对具体的定义、测量和分类问题,到目前为止,一般流行病学中的当前辩论几乎没有得到反映。上述提议要求:• 与精神障碍相关的生态流行病学工作模式;• 鼓励社区卫生服务机构和护理者组织更积极参与流行病学研究的实施策略;• 为参与国提供培训和服务设施实际益处的国际合作项目。