Nygaard Uffe, Kralund Henrik Højgrav, Sommerlund Mette
Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Aarhus University Hospital, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Case Rep Dermatol. 2013 Nov 16;5(3):336-9. doi: 10.1159/000357021. eCollection 2013.
Allergic contact dermatitis to textile dyes is considered to be a rare phenomenon. A recent review reported a prevalence of contact allergy to disperse dyes between 0.4 and 6.7%. The relevance of positive patch testing was not reported in all studies. Textile dye allergy is easily overlooked and is furthermore challenging to investigate as textile dyes are not labelled on clothing. In this report, we present a case of allergic contact dermatitis to a textile necklace. The patch test showed strong reactions to the necklace and the azo dyes Disperse Orange 1 and Disperse Yellow 3. Despite the European legislation and the reduced use of disperse dyes in Third World countries, disperse azo dyes still induce new cases of allergic contact dermatitis.
对纺织染料的过敏性接触性皮炎被认为是一种罕见现象。最近的一项综述报告称,对分散染料的接触性过敏患病率在0.4%至6.7%之间。并非所有研究都报告了阳性斑贴试验的相关性。纺织品染料过敏很容易被忽视,而且由于服装上未标注纺织品染料,因此调查起来也具有挑战性。在本报告中,我们介绍了一例对纺织项链发生过敏性接触性皮炎的病例。斑贴试验显示对该项链以及偶氮染料分散橙1和分散黄3有强烈反应。尽管有欧洲立法且第三世界国家减少了分散染料的使用,但分散偶氮染料仍会引发新的过敏性接触性皮炎病例。