• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缩短院前转运时间对腹部血管损伤患者预后的影响。

The impact of shorter prehospital transport times on outcomes in patients with abdominal vascular injuries.

作者信息

Ball Chad G, Williams Brian H, Tallah Clarisse, Salomone Jeffrey P, Feliciano David V

机构信息

Departments of Surgery, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2013 Dec 21;7(1):11. doi: 10.1186/1752-2897-7-11.

DOI:10.1186/1752-2897-7-11
PMID:24360286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3933386/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most deaths in patients with abdominal vascular injuries (ABVI) are caused by exsanguination and irreversible shock. Therefore, time to definitive hemorrhage control is an important factor affecting survival. The study goals were: (1) document current outcomes in patients with ABVI, and (2) compare outcomes to those from the era preceding improvements in an urban prehospital system.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients with ABVI at an urban level 1 trauma center was completed. Patients injured prior to prehospital transport improvements (1991-1994) were compared to those following a reduction in transport times (1995-2004).

RESULTS

Of 388 patients, 70 (18%) arrived prior to prehospital improvements (1991-1994). Patient/injury demographics were similar in both groups (age, sex, penetrating mechanism; p > 0.05). The number of patients presenting with ABVI increased (23 vs. 35 per year; p < 0.05) concurrent to a reduction in transport times (27 vs. 20 minutes; p < 0.05). Patients were more frequently unstable (63% vs. 91%; p < 0.05). Regardless of the specific vessel, mortality increased (37% vs. 67%; p < 0.05) following prehospital improvements.

CONCLUSIONS

A reduction in urban transport times resulted in an increase in (1) the number of patients arriving with abdominal vascular injuries, (2) the proportion presenting in physiologic extremis, and (3) overall mortality.

摘要

背景

腹部血管损伤(ABVI)患者的大多数死亡是由失血和不可逆休克引起的。因此,实现确定性出血控制的时间是影响生存的重要因素。本研究的目标是:(1)记录ABVI患者目前的治疗结果,(2)将结果与城市院前系统改善之前的时代进行比较。

方法

对一家城市一级创伤中心的所有ABVI患者进行了回顾性研究。将院前转运改善之前(1991 - 1994年)受伤的患者与转运时间缩短之后(1995 - 2004年)的患者进行比较。

结果

在388例患者中,70例(18%)在院前改善之前(1991 - 1994年)到达。两组患者/损伤的人口统计学特征相似(年龄、性别、穿透机制;p > 0.05)。ABVI患者的数量增加(每年23例对35例;p < 0.05),同时转运时间缩短(27分钟对20分钟;p < 0.05)。患者更频繁地处于不稳定状态(63%对91%;p < 0.05)。无论具体血管如何,院前改善后死亡率增加(37%对67%;p < 0.05)。

结论

城市转运时间的缩短导致(1)腹部血管损伤患者到达数量增加,(2)生理极度不稳定患者的比例增加,以及(3)总体死亡率增加。

相似文献

1
The impact of shorter prehospital transport times on outcomes in patients with abdominal vascular injuries.缩短院前转运时间对腹部血管损伤患者预后的影响。
J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2013 Dec 21;7(1):11. doi: 10.1186/1752-2897-7-11.
2
Prehospital tourniquet use in Operation Iraqi Freedom: effect on hemorrhage control and outcomes.伊拉克自由行动中院前止血带的使用:对出血控制及预后的影响
J Trauma. 2008 Feb;64(2 Suppl):S28-37; discussion S37. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318160937e.
3
Prehospital Trauma Scene and Transport Times for Pediatric and Adult Patients.儿科和成年患者的院前创伤现场及转运时间
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Feb 21;21(2):455-462. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.11.44597.
4
Analysis of Prehospital Scene Times and Interventions on Mortality Outcomes in a National Cohort of Penetrating and Blunt Trauma Patients.一项针对全国穿透性和钝性创伤患者队列的院前现场时间及干预措施对死亡率影响的分析。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018 Nov-Dec;22(6):691-697. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1448494. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
5
Ineffectiveness of on-site intravenous lines: is prehospital time the culprit?现场静脉输液无效:院前时间是罪魁祸首吗?
J Trauma. 1997 Oct;43(4):608-15; discussion 615-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199710000-00008.
6
Emergency medical services out-of-hospital scene and transport times and their association with mortality in trauma patients presenting to an urban Level I trauma center.创伤患者送至城市一级创伤中心后,院外现场和转运时间及其与死亡率的关系。
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;61(2):167-74. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.08.026. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
7
Association of Police Transport With Survival Among Patients With Penetrating Trauma in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.宾夕法尼亚州费城穿透性创伤患者的警察转运与生存的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2034868. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.34868.
8
Impact of prehospital mode of transport after severe injury: a multicenter evaluation from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium.创伤后院前转运方式对预后的影响:复苏结果联盟的多中心评估。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Mar;72(3):567-73; discussion 573-5; quiz 803. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31824baddf.
9
Emergency department thoracotomy: still useful after abdominal exsanguination?急诊开胸手术:在腹部大出血后仍有用吗?
J Trauma. 2008 Jan;64(1):1-7; discussion 7-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181606125.
10
Indication Bias Explains Some of the Observed Increased Mortality Associated With Use of Prehospital Intravenous Fluids in a Pediatric Trauma Population.指征偏倚解释了在儿科创伤人群中观察到的与院前静脉输液使用相关的死亡率增加的部分原因。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Jan;23(1):83-92. doi: 10.1111/acem.12841. Epub 2015 Dec 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Inferior vena cava injuries: Are we doing what we really must?下腔静脉损伤:我们是否在做我们真正必须做的事情?
Turk J Surg. 2024 Jun 28;40(2):119-125. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6363. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Treatment of penetrating injuries of the retrohepatic vena cava: systematic review protocol.肝后下腔静脉穿透伤的治疗:系统评价方案
J Vasc Bras. 2024 Oct 9;23:e20240003. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.202400032. eCollection 2024.
3
Survival benefit of direct transport to trauma centers among patients with unintentional injuries in Korea: a propensity score-matched analysis.韩国意外伤害患者直接转运至创伤中心的生存获益:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2023 Mar;10(1):37-43. doi: 10.15441/ceem.22.318. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
4
Penetrating injuries in Germany - epidemiology, management and outcome an analysis based on the TraumaRegister DGU®.德国的穿透性损伤 - 基于创伤登记处 DGU®的流行病学、处理和结局分析。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Jun 13;29(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00895-1.
5
Gunshot wound to big blue.大蓝(可能是某个特定对象,比如人、动物或物体)遭受枪伤。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2019 Aug 30;4(1):e000368. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2019-000368. eCollection 2019.
6
Association of Prehospital Time to In-Hospital Trauma Mortality in a Physician-Staffed Emergency Medicine System.在医生配备的急诊医学系统中,院前时间与院内创伤死亡率的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Dec 1;154(12):1117-1124. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.3475.
7
Is Prehospital Time Important for the Treatment of Severely Injured Patients? A Matched-Triplet Analysis of 13,851 Patients from the TraumaRegister DGU®.创伤登记处 DGU®对 13851 例严重创伤患者的配对三胞胎分析:院前时间对严重创伤患者的治疗重要吗?
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Jun 20;2019:5936345. doi: 10.1155/2019/5936345. eCollection 2019.
8
Delays in arrival and treatment in emergency departments: Women, children and non-trauma consultations the most at risk in humanitarian settings.急诊科的到达和治疗延迟:在人道主义环境中,女性、儿童和非创伤咨询面临最大风险。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 5;14(3):e0213362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213362. eCollection 2019.
9
Mortality after emergent trauma laparotomy: A multicenter, retrospective study.急诊创伤剖腹术后的死亡率:一项多中心回顾性研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Sep;83(3):464-468. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001619.
10
Efficacy and safety of damage control in experimental animal models of injury: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.损伤控制在实验性动物损伤模型中的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案
Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 22;3:136. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-136.

本文引用的文献

1
A decade's experience with balloon catheter tamponade for the emergency control of hemorrhage.十年使用球囊导管压迫法紧急控制出血的经验。
J Trauma. 2011 Feb;70(2):330-3. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318203285c.
2
Intraabdominal vascular injury: are we getting any better?腹内血管损伤:我们是否有任何进展?
J Trauma. 2010 Dec;69(6):1393-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e49045.
3
Damage control techniques for common and external iliac artery injuries: have temporary intravascular shunts replaced the need for ligation?股总动脉和髂外动脉损伤的损伤控制技术:临时血管内分流术是否已取代结扎术的必要性?
J Trauma. 2010 May;68(5):1117-20. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d865c0.
4
Early predictors of massive transfusion in patients sustaining torso gunshot wounds in a civilian level I trauma center.在一家一级民用创伤中心,躯干枪伤患者大量输血的早期预测因素。
J Trauma. 2010 Feb;68(2):298-304. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181cf7f2a.
5
Temporary intravascular shunts: when are we really using them according to the NTDB?临时血管内分流术:根据国家创伤数据库,我们何时真正在使用它们?
Am Surg. 2009 Jul;75(7):605-7.
6
Improvements in early mortality and coagulopathy are sustained better in patients with blunt trauma after institution of a massive transfusion protocol in a civilian level I trauma center.在一家民用一级创伤中心实施大量输血方案后,钝性创伤患者早期死亡率和凝血病的改善情况得到了更好的维持。
J Trauma. 2009 Jun;66(6):1616-24. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a59ad5.
7
Damage control resuscitation: a sensible approach to the exsanguinating surgical patient.损伤控制复苏:对外科大出血患者的明智处理方法。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jul;36(7 Suppl):S267-74. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817da7dc.
8
Successful damage control of complex vascular and urological gunshot injuries.复杂血管和泌尿系统枪伤的成功损伤控制
Can J Surg. 2006 Dec;49(6):437-8.
9
Factors associated with mortality in patients with penetrating abdominal vascular trauma.穿透性腹部血管创伤患者死亡的相关因素。
J Surg Res. 2002 Dec;108(2):222-6. doi: 10.1006/jsre.2002.6543.
10
Factors affecting mortality rates in patients with abdominal vascular injuries.影响腹部血管损伤患者死亡率的因素。
J Trauma. 2001 Jun;50(6):1020-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200106000-00008.