• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经肌肉适应 12 周最大自主等长收缩训练后。

Neuromuscular adaptations following 12-week maximal voluntary co-contraction training.

机构信息

Department of Sports and Life Science, National Institute of Fitness and Sports in Kanoya, 1 Shiromizu, Kanoya, Kagoshima, 891-2393, Japan.

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014 Apr;114(4):663-73. doi: 10.1007/s00421-013-2801-x. Epub 2013 Dec 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00421-013-2801-x
PMID:24368554
Abstract

PURPOSE

The present study examined neuromuscular adaptations following 12-week maximal voluntary co-contraction training.

METHODS

Sixteen young men were allocated to training (TG, n = 9) or control (CG, n = 7) group. TG conducted a training program (3 days/week), which consisted of 4-s maximal voluntary contractions of elbow flexors and extensors by simultaneously contracting both muscle groups at 90° of the elbow joint, followed by 4-s muscle relaxation (10 repetitions/set, 5 sets/day) for 12 weeks. In addition to the muscle thicknesses of elbow flexors and extensors, the torque and electromyograms (EMGs) of the two muscle groups during isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) were determined before (Pre), after 4 weeks, and 12 weeks of intervention.

RESULTS

After intervention, CG showed no significant changes in all measured variables. In TG, MVC torque significantly increased in both elbow flexors (+13 % at 4 weeks and +15 % at 12 weeks) and extensors (+27 % at 4 weeks and +46 % at 12 weeks) from Pre. Muscle thickness also significantly increased in both elbow flexors (+4 %) and extensors (+4 %) at 12 weeks. Agonist EMG activities during MVC significantly increased in both elbow flexors (+31 % at 4 weeks and +44 % at 12 weeks) and extensors (+27 % at 4 weeks and +40 % at 12 weeks), without changes in antagonist involuntary coactivation level in both muscle groups.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that maximal voluntary co-contraction is applicable as a training modality for increasing the size and strength of antagonistic muscle pairs without increasing involuntary coactivation level.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨 12 周最大自主等长收缩训练后神经肌肉适应性的变化。

方法

16 名年轻男性被分为训练组(TG,n=9)和对照组(CG,n=7)。TG 进行了为期 12 周的训练计划(每周 3 天),包括以 90°的角度同时收缩肘部屈肌和伸肌的 4 秒最大自主收缩,然后是 4 秒肌肉放松(每组 10 次,每天 5 组)。除了测量肘部屈肌和伸肌的肌肉厚度外,在干预前(Pre)、干预 4 周和 12 周后,还测定了两组肌肉在等长最大自主收缩(MVC)期间的扭矩和肌电图(EMG)。

结果

干预后,CG 组所有测量变量均无显著变化。在 TG 组,肘部屈肌(4 周时增加 13%,12 周时增加 15%)和伸肌(4 周时增加 27%,12 周时增加 46%)的 MVC 扭矩均显著增加。肘部屈肌(增加 4%)和伸肌(增加 4%)的肌肉厚度在 12 周时也显著增加。MVC 期间的原动肌 EMG 活动在肘部屈肌(4 周时增加 31%,12 周时增加 44%)和伸肌(4 周时增加 27%,12 周时增加 40%)均显著增加,而两组的拮抗肌无意识协同活动水平无变化。

结论

这些结果表明,最大自主等长收缩可作为一种训练方式,用于增加拮抗肌对的大小和力量,而不会增加无意识协同活动水平。

相似文献

1
Neuromuscular adaptations following 12-week maximal voluntary co-contraction training.神经肌肉适应 12 周最大自主等长收缩训练后。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014 Apr;114(4):663-73. doi: 10.1007/s00421-013-2801-x. Epub 2013 Dec 25.
2
Effect of short-term maximal voluntary co-contraction training on neuromuscular function.短期最大随意协同收缩训练对神经肌肉功能的影响。
Int J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;35(2):125-34. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1349137. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
3
Isometric training with maximal co-contraction instruction does not increase co-activation during exercises against external resistances.最大协同收缩指令的等长训练不会增加对抗外部阻力的运动中的协同激活。
J Sports Sci. 2014;32(1):60-9. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2013.805238. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
4
Minimum Intensity of Daily Six Eccentric Contractions to Increase Muscle Strength and Size.每日 6 次的最低强度离心收缩训练以增加肌肉力量和体积。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2024 Jun;34(6):e14683. doi: 10.1111/sms.14683.
5
Weekly minimum frequency of one maximal eccentric contraction to increase muscle strength of the elbow flexors.每周进行一次最大离心收缩的最低频率,以增强肘屈肌的肌力。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024 Jan;124(1):329-339. doi: 10.1007/s00421-023-05281-6. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
6
Effect of daily 3-s maximum voluntary isometric, concentric, or eccentric contraction on elbow flexor strength.每日 3 次最大等长、向心或离心收缩对肱二头肌力量的影响。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2022 May;32(5):833-843. doi: 10.1111/sms.14138. Epub 2022 Feb 13.
7
Comparison of neuromuscular adjustments associated with sustained isometric contractions of four different muscle groups.比较四种不同肌肉群持续等长收缩时的神经肌肉调整。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2013 May 15;114(10):1426-34. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01539.2012. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
8
Effects of Different Isometric Training Programs on Muscle Size and Function in the Elbow Flexors.不同等长训练方案对肘屈肌肌肉大小和功能的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 21;20(5):3837. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053837.
9
Comparison between concentric-only, eccentric-only, and concentric-eccentric resistance training of the elbow flexors for their effects on muscle strength and hypertrophy.仅向心、仅离心和向心-离心阻力训练对肱二头肌肌肉力量和肥大的影响比较。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2022 Dec;122(12):2607-2614. doi: 10.1007/s00421-022-05035-w. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
10
Trainability of muscular activity level during maximal voluntary co-contraction: comparison between bodybuilders and nonathletes.最大自主等长收缩时肌肉活动水平的可训练性:健美运动员与非运动员的比较。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 15;8(11):e79486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079486. eCollection 2013.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of three different types of exercises for selective contractions of supra- and infrahyoid muscles.比较三种不同类型的练习对上、下颏舌骨肌选择性收缩的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 30;11(1):7131. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86502-w.
2
Force-velocity relationship profile of elbow flexors in male gymnasts.男性体操运动员肘部屈肌的力-速度关系概况
PeerJ. 2021 Mar 15;9:e10907. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10907. eCollection 2021.
3
Protocol for Minute Calisthenics: a randomized controlled study of a daily, habit-based, bodyweight resistance training program.

本文引用的文献

1
Isometric training with maximal co-contraction instruction does not increase co-activation during exercises against external resistances.最大协同收缩指令的等长训练不会增加对抗外部阻力的运动中的协同激活。
J Sports Sci. 2014;32(1):60-9. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2013.805238. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
2
Effect of short-term maximal voluntary co-contraction training on neuromuscular function.短期最大随意协同收缩训练对神经肌肉功能的影响。
Int J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;35(2):125-34. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1349137. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
3
Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men.
分钟健身法方案:一项基于日常习惯的每日身体自重阻力训练计划的随机对照研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 15;20(1):1242. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09355-4.
4
To Flex or Rest: Does Adding No-Load Isometric Actions to the Inter-Set Rest Period in Resistance Training Enhance Muscular Adaptations? A Randomized-Controlled Trial.是选择屈伸还是休息:在抗阻训练的组间休息期间增加无负荷等长动作是否能增强肌肉适应性?一项随机对照试验。
Front Physiol. 2020 Jan 15;10:1571. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01571. eCollection 2019.
5
Design and Validation of Multichannel Wireless Wearable SEMG System for Real-Time Training Performance Monitoring.多通道无线可穿戴表面肌电信号系统的设计与验证及其在实时训练性能监测中的应用。
J Healthc Eng. 2019 Sep 9;2019:4580645. doi: 10.1155/2019/4580645. eCollection 2019.
6
Comparisons of Resistance Training and "Cardio" Exercise Modalities as Countermeasures to Microgravity-Induced Physical Deconditioning: New Perspectives and Lessons Learned From Terrestrial Studies.抗阻训练与“有氧”运动方式作为对抗微重力诱导身体机能衰退对策的比较:来自地面研究的新观点与经验教训
Front Physiol. 2019 Sep 10;10:1150. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01150. eCollection 2019.
7
Corticospinal excitability for flexor carpi radialis decreases with baroreceptor unloading during intentional co-contraction with opposing forearm muscles.在与对抗性前臂肌肉进行意向性共收缩期间,随着压力感受器卸载,桡侧腕屈肌的皮质脊髓兴奋性降低。
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Aug;237(8):1947-1958. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05563-6. Epub 2019 May 25.
8
Neuromuscular Adaptations to Work-matched Maximal Eccentric versus Concentric Training.工作匹配的最大离心与向心训练对神经肌肉的适应性影响。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Aug;50(8):1629-1640. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001611.
9
A higher effort-based paradigm in physical activity and exercise for public health: making the case for a greater emphasis on resistance training.基于努力程度的更高范式的体育活动与锻炼促进公众健康:支持更加强调抗阻训练的理由
BMC Public Health. 2017 Apr 5;17(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4209-8.
10
Questioning the Resistance/Aerobic Training Dichotomy: A commentary on physiological adaptations determined by effort rather than exercise modality.质疑抗阻训练/有氧训练二分法:一种基于努力而非运动方式决定生理适应的评论。
J Hum Kinet. 2014 Dec 30;44:137-42. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0119. eCollection 2014 Dec 9.
抗阻训练负荷并不决定年轻男性的训练介导的肥大增益。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012 Jul;113(1):71-7. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00307.2012. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
4
Muscle activation of the elbow flexor and extensor muscles during self-resistance exercises: comparison of unilateral maximal cocontraction and bilateral self-resistance.在自我抵抗运动中,屈肌和伸肌的肌肉激活:单侧最大协同收缩和双侧自我抵抗的比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Sep;26(9):2468-77. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31823bc0a2.
5
Similar increases in muscle size and strength in young men after training with maximal shortening or lengthening contractions when matched for total work.在总工作量相匹配的情况下,年轻人进行最大缩短或延长收缩训练后,肌肉大小和力量的增加相似。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 Apr;112(4):1587-92. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2078-x. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
6
Strength training's chronic effects on muscle architecture parameters of different arm sites.力量训练对不同手臂部位肌肉结构参数的慢性影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Jun;25(6):1711-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181dba162.
7
Developing maximal neuromuscular power: Part 1--biological basis of maximal power production.发展最大神经肌肉力量:第 1 部分——最大力量产生的生物学基础。
Sports Med. 2011 Jan 1;41(1):17-38. doi: 10.2165/11537690-000000000-00000.
8
Neuromuscular adaptations following antagonist resisted training.拮抗肌抗阻训练后的神经肌肉适应性改变
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Jan;24(1):156-64. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181bd4317.
9
American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults.美国运动医学学院立场声明。健康成年人抗阻训练的进阶模式。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Mar;41(3):687-708. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181915670.
10
Changes in muscle size and MHC composition in response to resistance exercise with heavy and light loading intensity.重度和轻度负荷强度的抗阻训练对肌肉大小和肌球蛋白重链(MHC)组成的影响。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008 Nov;105(5):1454-61. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90538.2008. Epub 2008 Sep 11.