Centre for Health Exercise and Sport Science, Southampton Solent University, East Park Terrace, Southampton UK.
J Hum Kinet. 2014 Dec 30;44:137-42. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0119. eCollection 2014 Dec 9.
This paper discusses and challenges the current opinion that exercise adaptation is generally defined by modality; resistance exercise (RE), or aerobic exercise (AE). In presenting a strong body of recent research which demonstrably challenges these perceptions we suggest alternate hypotheses towards physiological adaptation which is hinged more upon the effort than the exercise modality. Practical implications of this interpretation of exercise adaptation might effect change in exercise adherence since existing barriers to exercise of time, costs, specialized equipment, etc. become nullified. In presenting the evidence herein we suggest that lay persons wishing to attain the health and fitness (including strength and muscle hypertrophy) benefits of exercise can choose from a wide range of potential exercise modalities so long as the effort is high. Future research should consider this hypothesis by directly comparing RE and AE for acute responses and chronic adaptations.
本文讨论并挑战了目前的观点，即运动适应通常由运动方式定义；抗阻运动（RE）或有氧运动（AE）。通过呈现大量最近的研究，这些研究明显挑战了这些观念，我们提出了替代假设，即生理适应更多地取决于运动的强度而不是运动方式。这种对运动适应的解释可能会对运动坚持产生影响，因为现有的运动时间、成本、专用设备等障碍变得无效。在提出本文的证据时，我们建议希望获得运动健康和健身（包括力量和肌肉肥大）益处的非专业人士可以从广泛的潜在运动方式中进行选择，只要运动强度高即可。未来的研究应该通过直接比较 RE 和 AE 的急性反应和慢性适应来考虑这一假设。
