van der Lee Nadine, Driessen Erik W, Houwaart Eddy S, Caccia Nicolette C, Scheele Fedde
Department of Health Care Education, Sint Lucas Andreas Hospital , Amsterdam , The Netherlands .
J Interprof Care. 2014 Mar;28(2):123-7. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2013.869196. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
Collaboration between different groups of health care professionals is often rooted in a long and often difficult history. This history can exert a strong influence on how professionals collaborate and historical tensions can contribute to problems in contemporary practice. However, literature about interprofessional collaboration often ignores the historical underpinnings of collaboration. In this paper, the historical development of interprofessional collaboration between obstetricians and midwives within the setting of Dutch obstetrical care is explored using a review of Dutch and English literature for documents explicitly or implicitly describing the historical development of this collaboration. This literature delineates the establishment of professional boundaries and the formalization of the collaboration between the two professions. It also details the history of physician domination over the midwives both in midwifery practice and education and the relatively recent reversal of this situation. Moreover, the shift in collaborative partner from general practitioner to obstetrician and its effect on collaboration is examined. Insight into the historical foundations of Dutch maternity care collaboration may allow us to understand the origins, and thus formulate possible solutions, for contemporary problems within this collaboration.
不同医疗保健专业群体之间的合作往往有着悠久且通常颇为艰难的历史根源。这段历史会对专业人员的合作方式产生重大影响,历史上的紧张关系可能会导致当代实践中出现问题。然而,关于跨专业合作的文献往往忽视了合作的历史基础。在本文中,通过回顾荷兰语和英语文献中明确或隐含描述荷兰产科护理背景下产科医生与助产士之间跨专业合作历史发展的文献,探讨了这种合作的历史发展。这些文献勾勒出了专业界限的建立以及两个专业之间合作的正规化。它还详细阐述了在助产实践和教育中医生对助产士的主导历史以及这种情况相对较新的逆转。此外,还研究了合作伙伴从全科医生向产科医生的转变及其对合作的影响。深入了解荷兰产科护理合作的历史基础,可能使我们理解当代合作中问题的根源,从而制定出可能的解决方案。