• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有机食品加工:概念、初始定义及评估框架

Organic food processing: a framework for concept, starting definitions and evaluation.

作者信息

Kahl Johannes, Alborzi Farnaz, Beck Alexander, Bügel Susanne, Busscher Nicolaas, Geier Uwe, Matt Darja, Meischner Tabea, Paoletti Flavio, Pehme Sirli, Ploeger Angelika, Rembiałkowska Ewa, Schmid Otto, Strassner Carola, Taupier-Letage Bruno, Załęcka Aneta

机构信息

Department of Organic Food Quality and Food Culture, University of Kassel, D-37213, Witzenhausen, Germany.

出版信息

J Sci Food Agric. 2014 Oct;94(13):2582-94. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6542. Epub 2014 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1002/jsfa.6542
PMID:24375441
Abstract

In 2007 EU Regulation (EC) 834/2007 introduced principles and criteria for organic food processing. These regulations have been analysed and discussed in several scientific publications and research project reports. Recently, organic food quality was described by principles, aspects and criteria. These principles from organic agriculture were verified and adapted for organic food processing. Different levels for evaluation were suggested. In another document, underlying paradigms and consumer perception of organic food were reviewed against functional food, resulting in identifying integral product identity as the underlying paradigm and a holistic quality view connected to naturalness as consumers' perception of organic food quality. In a European study, the quality concept was applied to the organic food chain, resulting in a problem, namely that clear principles and related criteria were missing to evaluate processing methods. Therefore the goal of this paper is to describe and discuss the topic of organic food processing to make it operational. A conceptual background for organic food processing is given by verifying the underlying paradigms and principles of organic farming and organic food as well as on organic processing. The proposed definition connects organic processing to related systems such as minimal, sustainable and careful, gentle processing, and describes clear principles and related criteria. Based on food examples, such as milk with different heat treatments, the concept and definitions were verified. Organic processing can be defined by clear paradigms and principles and evaluated according criteria from a multidimensional approach. Further work has to be done on developing indicators and parameters for assessment of organic food quality.

摘要

2007年,欧盟第834/2007号法规引入了有机食品加工的原则和标准。这些法规已在多篇科学出版物和研究项目报告中得到分析和讨论。最近,有机食品质量是通过原则、方面和标准来描述的。这些来自有机农业的原则经过验证并适用于有机食品加工。有人提出了不同的评估水平。在另一篇文献中,针对功能食品对有机食品的潜在范式和消费者认知进行了综述,结果确定整体产品特性是潜在范式,而与自然性相关的整体质量观是消费者对有机食品质量的认知。在一项欧洲研究中,质量概念应用于有机食品链,结果出现了一个问题,即缺乏明确的原则和相关标准来评估加工方法。因此,本文的目的是描述和讨论有机食品加工这一主题,使其具有可操作性。通过验证有机农业、有机食品以及有机加工的潜在范式和原则,给出了有机食品加工的概念背景。所提出的定义将有机加工与诸如最低限度、可持续和谨慎、温和加工等相关体系联系起来,并描述了明确的原则和相关标准。基于食品实例,如经过不同热处理的牛奶,对概念和定义进行了验证。有机加工可以通过明确的范式和原则来定义,并根据多维方法的标准进行评估。在开发有机食品质量评估指标和参数方面,还需要进一步开展工作。

相似文献

1
Organic food processing: a framework for concept, starting definitions and evaluation.有机食品加工:概念、初始定义及评估框架
J Sci Food Agric. 2014 Oct;94(13):2582-94. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6542. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
2
Organic food quality: a framework for concept, definition and evaluation from the European perspective.有机食品质量:从欧洲角度出发的概念、定义和评价框架。
J Sci Food Agric. 2012 Nov;92(14):2760-5. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.5640. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
3
The influence of organic production on food quality - research findings, gaps and future challenges.有机生产对食品质量的影响——研究结果、差距与未来挑战。
J Sci Food Agric. 2014 Oct;94(13):2600-4. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6578. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
4
Status quo and future research challenges on organic food quality determination with focus on laboratory methods.聚焦实验室方法的有机食品质量测定现状与未来研究挑战
J Sci Food Agric. 2014 Oct;94(13):2595-9. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6553. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
5
Food safety and organic meats.食品安全与有机肉类。
Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2012;3:203-25. doi: 10.1146/annurev-food-022811-101158. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
6
Organic food quality: from field to fork.
J Sci Food Agric. 2012 Nov;92(14):2751-2. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.5888.
7
Research on organic food quality needs a system approach.
J Sci Food Agric. 2014 Oct;94(13):2577. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6836.
8
The concept of animal welfare at the interface between producers and scientists: the example of organic pig farming.生产者与科学家之间的动物福利理念:以有机养猪业为例。
Acta Biotheor. 2011 Jun;59(2):173-83. doi: 10.1007/s10441-011-9135-z. Epub 2011 May 11.
9
Metabolite profiling on wheat grain to enable a distinction of samples from organic and conventional farming systems.对小麦籽粒进行代谢物分析,以区分来自有机和传统种植系统的样本。
J Sci Food Agric. 2014 Oct;94(13):2605-12. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6566. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
10
A brief overview of food hygiene legislation.食品卫生法规概述。
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2007 Aug;114(8):294-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Organic Juice Processing Quality from the Processors' Perspective: A Qualitative Study.从加工商角度看有机果汁加工质量:一项定性研究
Foods. 2023 Jan 13;12(2):377. doi: 10.3390/foods12020377.
2
Are They Careful Enough? Testing Consumers' Perception of Alternative Processing Technologies on the Quality of Organic Food.他们够细心吗?测试消费者对有机食品质量的替代加工技术的感知。
Nutrients. 2021 Aug 24;13(9):2922. doi: 10.3390/nu13092922.
3
Consumer Perspectives on Processing Technologies for Organic Food.消费者对有机食品加工技术的看法。
Foods. 2021 May 27;10(6):1212. doi: 10.3390/foods10061212.
4
Comment on: "A Systematic Review of Organic Versus Conventional Food Consumption: Is There a Measurable Benefit on Human Health? Nutrients 2020, 12, 7".评“有机食品与传统食品消费的系统评价:对人类健康是否有可衡量的益处?营养素 2020, 12, 7”。
Nutrients. 2020 Mar 5;12(3):696. doi: 10.3390/nu12030696.
5
Human health implications of organic food and organic agriculture: a comprehensive review.有机食品和有机农业对人类健康的影响:全面综述
Environ Health. 2017 Oct 27;16(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12940-017-0315-4.