London Hospital Medical College, University of London, UK.
J Youth Adolesc. 1978 Mar;7(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/BF01538683.
This article points out two contradictions in current adolescent theory. The first is between the "classical" point of view, espousing the notion of "storm and stress," and the "empirical" view, supporting a concept of adolescence as relatively peaceful and harmonious. The latter approach, however, creates a second contradiction because it does not explain how young people cope with the major adaptations demanded as a result of changes in their physical, social, and emotional spheres of life. The article examines the status of concepts such as the "generation gap" and "identity crisis" and concludes with the formulation of a "focal" theory of adolescence which attempts to resolve the contradictions discussed earlier.
本文指出了当前青少年理论中的两个矛盾。第一个是“经典”观点与“经验”观点之间的矛盾,前者主张“风暴与压力”,后者则支持青春期相对平静和谐的概念。然而,后一种方法又产生了第二个矛盾,因为它没有解释年轻人如何应对由于生理、社会和情感生活领域的变化而产生的重大适应。本文探讨了“代沟”和“身份危机”等概念的现状,并得出了一个“焦点”青少年理论,试图解决前面讨论的矛盾。